The End Game Of #MeToo

What’s the end game of #MeToo? Will it be the “end of Game”? When any male romantic initiative is outlawed and the social consequences for flirting to gauge female interest are severe enough to cost men their livelihoods, femcunts think we’ll have a shrewtopia where only women solicit men for dates (sex). But that’s never gonna happen because women are constitutionally averse to making the first move. They don’t fall hard for passive men.

I can see a sexual market dystopia develop in which real true passion escapes to an underground romance bazaar where women can feel again what it’s like to be desired. To be hotly, remorselessly pursued by assertive men. They’ll miss that when it’s gone. (A reader says this is basically the plotline to 1984.)

In the meantime, the fantasy of women hitting on the men “they want”, while loserboys are straitjacketed by the State to observe the mate market from a position of forlorn impotency, is just that…a grrlpower projection of wishful thinking that denies the reality of female vulnerability and the need to feel pursued by men. Women who make the first move never feel right about it afterwards, because they know deep inside that men will agree to easy, no muss no fuss sex with women they wouldn’t normally hit on if the man had to initiate. So the pursuer woman always feels like her “conquest” settled for her. This is a rickety, poisoned foundation for the development of a committed relationship.

A reader wonders,

isn’t the goal to get the woman to pursue, though; and to make her feel like you’re settling to some extent?

We have to draw a distinction between a man presenting himself as a challenge to women and a man passively accepting a woman’s forthright solicitation for a date or sex. A woman who unambiguously approaches a man to get his attention and to start a convo with him knows she’s making it easy for him. She has reversed the sexual polarity with extreme prejudice, and no worthy romance can come from that.

***

Since unwanted groping has been in the news lately, it’s a good time to revisit the Game concept of “kino escalation“, i.e., getting increasingly physical with a girl to acclimate her to your touch. (Touch-ophobes don’t get laid.) The big distinction between Franken gropers and PUA probers is this: the latter operates within the context of receptivity cues from women.

Gropers like Franken cold-COCK, presumably, unreceptive women who had no inkling they were the subject of flirtatious intent until tongues were mashed deep down throats and tushes grabbed without forewarning. That’s not Game. That’s anti-Game of the sloppily aggressive kind.

There are two types of anti-Game: the socially awkward neediness of beta males, and the socially awkward pushiness of omega perverts. Neither resembles the studied charm and flirty teasing of the Game-aware man.

Touching a woman during a courtship sooner rather than later, and more frequently rather than sparingly, is an effective means of building a comfortable physical rapport with her. Women aren’t cognizant of their own arousal mechanisms, so when a man refuses to touch a woman she isn’t going to think “oh he’s so gentlemanly to keep his hands to himself”, she’s going to think “this man is uncomfortable around me, he must not have much experience with women…I don’t think he’s the one for me”.

So incrementally frequent and intensifying touching is a critical part of seduction. But it doesn’t start with the tits and ass, it starts with a light touch on the forearm or shoulder, maybe a breathtakingly shortened distance between lips and ear to whisper an in-joke, etc. A forearm graze may lead to a warm smile and her body leaning closer into you, which is your cue to touch her on a slightly more erogenous zone and let your hand linger a little longer.

This is the art of flirting, and it used to be unspoken common sense about how the sexes relate to each other, before the present day moral panic that is gunning for the obliteration of any romantic tension between men and women.

Leftism: It’s A Woman Thing

Supporting Lott’s research that found female suffrage immediately shifted American politics to the Left and enlarged the State, a recent study likewise concluded that female enfranchisement accelerated the same Leftward lurch well into the late 20th-early 21st Century, and it continues moving the country to the Left today (tradcon white knights hit hardest). Furthermore, the female compulsion to vote into existence larger and more intrusive government crosses party identification lines.

Regardless of their party identification, women are more supportive of an activist government. https://t.co/57c3C09mPW pic.twitter.com/grGN2w0D8u

— Rolf Degen (@DegenRolf) December 12, 2017

If America collapses from debt overhang and mass nonWhite colonization, sad to say you can lay the blame primarily on women. The feminization of institutions and decision-making bodies in Western nations will be their undoing.

Thot Patrol isn’t just an edgy meme, it’s a survival tactic.

The Permanently Married Woman

The unmarried woman is a temporary and fleeting state of adult womanhood, as noted pithily by Gabber @brutuslaurentius:

There is no such thing as an unmarried woman. She marries a husband, her Johns, or the state. For the well being of civilization it is best she marry a husband.

The Fundamental Premise ensures that a woman will be cared for as long as she has a stash of viable eggs (or the youthful promise of eggs on the way), and the largesse she receives will be out of proportion to her non-reproductive contribution to society. This is because the sexual market is the one market to rule them all. Most societies throughout history have organized themselves around the pampering and coddling of their prime fertility womenfolk, and this natural impulse extends to providing lush safety nets even for old women who have no further reproductive use.

In short, men are expendable, women are perishable. On a societal scale, that means men must strike out on their own without much help from the State, women, or other men, and women must secure the blessings of maximal beta provisioning before they have hit the Wall.

Practically, no woman remains unmarried for long. She’ll get her resources from a husband or husband-substitute, i.e. the State, and this explains why women broadly (heh) vote for bigger government and more welfare…..they’re covering all their bases. But as it is the wont of the solipsistic sex to ignore feedback loops, what women fail to comprehend is that their continual striving to enlarge the scope of the State necessarily restricts the scope of individual beta provider men who must compete with government largesse and wage-gutting foreign colonizers for the hearts of women. As beta males lose their competitive edge, they drop out of the marriage market, forcing more women to hitch their fates to the State. A negative reinforcement cycle is established that ends with the Africanization of Euro-White nations.

Women, a word of advice: you can have Big Daddy State or you can have dependable, devoted provider husbands, but you can’t have both. In time, antagonistic provisioners of female safety and security will come to blows, given that they mutually undermine the ability of each to satisfy women. A big lavish government cheapens the contributions of beta males, lowering their SMV, while a society organized for the benefit of a large, high-earning, beta male middle class reduces the necessity of government intervention to protect women from lifelong penury.

You Can’t Turn A Third World Ho Into A First World Housewife

Freelance Comment of the Week winner is Gabber @antidem,

When I was a kid, we worried that we’d destroy our civilization in nuclear fire. Instead, we destroyed it by trying to play Captain Save-a-hoe to the whole world’s supply of drunks, sluts, layabouts, petty criminals, and low-IQ Third World proles. I’m not convinced this is really better.

Death by nuclear fire at least leaves the soul intact.

Shitlord Of The Month: Paul Nehlen

Twatter link. JClod throws around a lot of pedophile insults. Skypological projection? (yes)

More predictable lack of self-awareness from our chosen caricature:

Do bottleneck tribalists have no mirrors in their homes?

Save these confessionals of distilled anti-White Christian hate from the likes of JClod, because when #110 arrives no one will be able to feign ignorance about why it happened.

Fake News

A couple of Fake News updates for you today, (because somebody has to record this perfidy for the benefit of future historians digging through the tomes of Western Civ for the source of its ruination).

First, the primary Roy Moore accuser has confessed she forged his writing on her high school yearbook. You’d think that would be enough to blow her credibility out of the water, but no, ABC News jumped in to provide cover for her.

In a shameful and coached interview with ABC News reporter Tom Llamas, Ms. Nelson was allowed to explain away the forgery as “notes” added by her to a legitimate signature.

As People’s Pundit Daily (PPD) reported, the inscription was clearly written in two different inks and appeared to be two different sets of handwriting. However, no expert would go on the record without physically analyzing the yearbook, which the Moore campaign called on Allred to agree to do.

She repeatedly refused. And now we know why.

“Nelson admits she did make notes to the inscription,” ABC News’ Llamas says in his narration. “But the message was all Roy Moore.”

“Beverly, he signed your yearbook,” he asked Nelson.

“He did sign it,” she responds.

“And you made some notes underneath,” he coaches in a follow-up.

“Yes,” Nelson replies.

The inscription in the yearbook reads “Roy Moore D.A,” which was purported to stand for “District Attorney.” Aside from the fact that Judge Moore was a D.D.A., not a DA, the “D.A.” matches initials on court records for “Delbra Adams,” who was Judge Moore’s assistant at the time.

In 1999, Ms. Nelson filed for a divorce against her husband and, as it turns out, the case ended up in Judge Moore’s court. That’s another detail that stood in contrast to her story, which claimed she did not have any contact with Judge Moore after the alleged assault attempt. The ruling made by Judge Moore against Nelson is motive, one that Big Media either failed to uncover or omitted.

The media lie by omission more than they lie by commission, which affords them plausible deniability if their truth-tampering is exposed. But omission lies are in critical ways worse than commission lies, because a BIG FAT LYING NARRATIVE can be sustained much longer with the former.

This old bitter crank Beverly Nelson is clearly making shit up to deep six Moore’s election chances. Forging his name (badly) and liner notes reveals a person of bad character. She’s mad af still to this day that Moore didn’t marry her, and now she’s gonna play a game of “gotcha!” by conspiring with a willing accomplice — the Jewish Interest Media — to take him down.

It’s more important than before that Roy Moore win his election, because it would be a killer rebuke to the Globohomo Uniparty.

***

Item #2: CNN misreported (i.e., lied about) a news story concerning Don Trump Jr receiving an email with Wikileaks information. They framed the story as if DTJ got advance knowledge of a Wikileaks dump of Clinton emails when in fact they botched the date and DTJ actually received the email the day after the Wiki dump was made public, turning CNN’s BREAKING NEWS into a broken work of shitlib fanfiction.

So CNN misreported the date of the Wikileaks email that @DonaldJTrumpJr received, meaning that the entire point of the story —
that the campaign might have gotten advance warning of the leaks — is wrong. Wow. https://t.co/oiXngwHZAq

— Sarah Westwood (@sarahcwestwood) December 8, 2017

Like I’ve been saying, the only solution to Fake News is a mass culling of shitlib emotional and mental runts from their position of predominance in big media. Oh, and Trump has the green light to fire Mueller now, and end the witch hunt against him by Mueller’s squadron of hillary lackeys. Or are the MAGAmen just gonna sit idly by as thecunt and her surrogates methodically execute a coup against a fairly elected President and the American citizens who support him?

Ethnic Foodism

Hey, here’s a great idea! Let’s destroy the cultural continuity, interpersonal trust level, institutional competence and transparency, and social fabric of our nation for a taquito food truck! Recipe? What’s that?

***

I can’t think of a stupider or more banally treasonous political philosophy than Ethnic Foodism. Our enemies are ridiculous. Only the media sustains this clown world, and their hold over the gooniversalism narrative is rapidly loosening.