“Thoughts And Prayers” = “Candlelight Vigils”

Christophobe shitlibs have latched like a hungry infant onto the snarkmeme that “thoughts and prayers” don’t solve gun violence. (Shitlibs have lost the part of their soul that understands people say these niceties not to solve social problems but to soothe the grief-stricken.)

What’s ironic about this recent malicious sneering by shitlibs against “thoughts and prayers” following the Sutherland Springs church massacre by an avowed atheist goon who escaped from a mental hospital, is that it mirrors the candlelight vigils shitlibs like to organize after a Muslim terror attack. If “thoughts and prayers” are political cowardice and an excuse for inaction, then so are candlelight vigils.

Of course, what shitlibs mean by political action is what they want put into action: banning guns and repealing the 2nd Amendment, with the ultimate goal of disarming White America so that they can start throwing dissident thinkers into prison without stirring up much fuss, like they do in Britain. What shitlibs DON’T mean by political action: banning the immigration of Muslims to prevent Muslim terror attacks.

The candlelight vigil is the shitlib call to inaction, because they fear what action means for their desired Diversitopia.

The similarity ends there, because “thoughts and prayers” are never meant to substitute for a long-term solution to chronic social problems, unlike “candlelight vigils” which are meant for exactly that reason.

A REAL solution to the Texas Atheist Massacre is demanding more competence from our government officials to enforce the laws already on the books, instead of what we get: a clerical error that enabled our atheist smasher of baby skulls to buy guns.

The shitlib will to power means consistency of thought and loyalty to principles is off the table; all that matters is winning the rhetorical battle, and the shitlib says whatever xir thinks gives xir the upper hand in the atomized debate zone. If the shitlib is self-contradicting, no problem! Just wriggle out of the lawgic trap by segueing to a freshly muddled thought. Accountability is for those who play by the rules.

Study: Masculine Men Prefer Feminine Women

¡SCIENCE! says….

sexual polarity for the win!

Men report stronger attraction to femininity in women’s faces when [the men’s] testosterone levels are high

Many studies have shown that women’s judgments of men’s attractiveness are affected by changes in levels of sex hormones.

Alpha fux, beta bux.

However, no studies have tested for associations between changes in levels of sex hormones and men’s judgments of women’s attractiveness. To investigate this issue, we compared men’s attractiveness judgments of feminized and masculinized women’s and men’s faces in test sessions where salivary testosterone was high and test sessions where salivary testosterone was relatively low. Men reported stronger attraction to femininity in women’s faces in test sessions where salivary testosterone was high than in test sessions where salivary testosterone was low. This effect was found to be specific to judgments of opposite-sex faces. The strength of men’s reported attraction to femininity in men’s faces did not differ between high and low testosterone test sessions, suggesting that the effect of testosterone that we observed for judgments of women’s faces was not due to a general response bias.

Soyboys are despised even by other soyboys.

Collectively, these findings suggest that changes in testosterone levels contribute to the strength of men’s reported attraction to femininity in women’s faces and complement previous findings showing that testosterone modulates men’s interest in sexual stimuli.

The more masculine the man, the greater his desire for feminine women. The less masculine the man, the greater his tolerance (if not desire) for masculine women.

Note that high T and masculinity are the primary drivers of male libido, so the preferences or tolerations of effeminate men don’t matter all that much to the Darwinian prerogative if low T males can’t get sexually aroused for the manjaws in their midst. The boner doesn’t lie.

Executive Summary: The God of Biomechanics will not be disavowed.

A reader writes,

this [study] helps us understand why more masculine female faces have become the norm in media.

Heh. The Gaystream Media is filled to brimming tears with low T limp-wrists who aren’t bothered by the lack of feminine female colleagues. You couple that with the natural selection effect of obnoxious status striving fields like media whoredom drawing in manjawed careerist shrikes and you get what we have today: Snarky, virtue signaling Fake News brought to you by the sexually amorphic androgynes who have swarmed like insects into media brothels, and who have corrupted the integrity of their occupation with the presence of their own corrupted minds and bodies.

This is why sexually chadmorphic masculine men like Trump trigger them so badly; the fear and loathing of the fancy male feminist and fierce female ballcutter for Trump is reflective of much deeper emotions than those provoked by political disagreement; this bitchback goes to the id and its force multiplier is raw envy and suppressed desire.

Liberalism Is Childishness

Libs love platitudes because they paper over ugly truths.
Love wins = Don’t fight back
Unity = Concealed disunity
Tolerance = Make the best of a bad situation
The essence of a lib is childishness. Liberalism is a juvenile ideology. It’s rationalizing retreat from adult concerns.

White liberals have a very low fertility rate. It’s concordant with human nature that childishness is associated with childlessness. The good news is that there are fewer White shitlibs with each generation, so this Clown World insanity won’t last. The only mystery is what will follow in the vacuum left by the end of the era of White shitlibbery.

Study: Diversity + Proximity = Low Social Capital

Diversity + Proximity = War update (the hits (to the Narrative) just keep on coming!): Cities in the predominately White hold-out of the Midwest have the highest social capital scores. Diverse cities the lowest.

While entertainment, climate and recreation are no doubt important considerations for many people, there are many other location-related factors that influence quality of life. Social capital, for example, is rarely factored into the various indexes that rank and rate cities according to their quality of life.

As the World Bank defines it, “social capital refers to the institutions, relationships, and norms that shape the quality and quantity of a society’s social interactions.” In other words, social capital looks at community relationships and social cohesion. People living in places with high levels of social capital are likely to feel more connected to their local community and less isolated from their surroundings, while the opposite is true in places with low levels of social capital.

Generally, people build social capital through their participation in organizations and institutions. Examples may include attending religious services, volunteering at a special interest organization, joining a sports league or any other activity in which people can build a common bond or share a common goal. Social capital, therefore, is not necessarily a reflection of “quality of life” as many city planners understand the concept. While a community may have a high number of nice cafes and art galleries, they do not necessarily improve an individual’s quality of life if he or she holds no personal or emotional attachment to them.

Richard Florida BTFO.

According this index, the places with the highest social capital scores are mostly Midwestern cities where “quality of life” scores based on nightlife and natural amenities are lowest. These cities mostly have small, relatively homogenous populations. By contrast, many of the smaller, ethnically diverse cities in Texas, Arizona and California, as well as many cities in the smaller cities in the Southeast are at the bottom of the list in terms of social capital. Joining them near the bottom are large auto-dependent cities like Phoenix, Las Vegas, Los Angeles and Houston.

Diversity is our lonesomeness. Homogeneity is our tight communal bonds. But, hey, you can get a Korean taco in your favorite Diversitopia to eat your despair!

No one but a virtue sniveling White liberal would be surprised (or pretend to be surprised) to learn that ethnic and racial homogeneity — that is, genetic closeness — buttresses stronger, healthier communities because people feel more at ease with those who are similar to themselves. Diversity isn’t a strength at all, unless you’re a globosouled bugman whose religion is your Faceborg quest for Likes and whose patron saint is your iPhag.

The article notes that for those who want to strike a balance between consumerist amenities, natural beauty, and social connectedness, the Pacific Northwest is the place for you.

In addition, small- and medium-sized cities in the Pacific Northwest and the Intermountain West offer a good balance between social capital and quality of life concerns. These cities have both the physical and social infrastructure to help people enjoy their community while also building the sort of emotional attachment required for long-term civic health.

Unfortunately, the PNW is also loaded down with the worst shitlib Whites in the country, a veritable outpost of soylandia uptalkers and bluehair fatties. You have to get away from the coast before people start resembling normal, sexually dimorphic humans again.

PS I’ve added this research to the Diversity + Proximity = War Reference List on the front page of the blog, bringing the total number of linked, lib-triggering studies to forty-three.

The Cuntescending Woman

Reader Matt has a Game question about how to handle a cuntescending woman.

Hey, was hoping for your advice here. I met this girl who’s married and in her 30s. I’m in my 20s and not attracted to her at all, yet she kept calling me her “little brother”. Because I’m not attracted to her I don’t want to be with her. But it still seemed like she was kinda friend zoning me anyway, a subtle form of disrespect. Because I want all women (even the ones I’m not interested in) to respect me im curious about your take on this and if it is a sign of disrespect, what to do about it.

I wouldn’t be so quick to assume she’s disrespecting you. Is she condescending? Sure. But women will sometimes condescend to relieve sexual tension, aka flirt. This particular woman knows she’s married and older than you. (And remember that in older woman years, a 10 year age difference is like a twenty year gap.) Rhetorically placing you in a “do not touch” glass case is how she spares her ego, given that she probably (and rightly) figures you, as a younger man, wouldn’t be attracted to her. It’s a case of sour grapes. (“i can’t have him, so I’ll pretend he’s off-limits by patronizing him like a little brother”)

It’s unusually casual for a woman you just met to refer to you as her “little brother”. She’s creating an artificial emotional distance between you two because she’s attracted to you but doesn’t want to jeopardize her marriage.

Don’t get all bent out of shape the next time she says it. Be calm and composed. Reply in the prescribed CH manner, with amused mastery:

“That’s sexy little brother to you.”

Replying this way let’s her know 1. she’s not worth taking seriously and 2. you are on to her true feelings for her. Even if she doesn’t have those feelings, you come out on top because you will have assumed the sale and thus regained hand over her. Give it a shot and let us know how it goes.

The CH Life Cycle Theory Of Western White Nations

Pre-modernity: “Nation is race”
Modernity: “Don’t ask, don’t tell”
Post-modernity: “Nation is race-less”
Post-apocalypse: “Nation is tribe”

Trump The Charmer

An alpha male charmer like Trump charms men as well as women. Women are aroused, men are admiring.

PS The mental patients at Very Fake News CNN edited out this part of the video clip so they could rant insanely about Trump the rube violating international protocol and killing innocent koi. Does a day go by when CNN isn’t deliberately altering or editing video to pass off a lie as the truth? Very Fake News doesn’t adequately describe CNN’s sins. Maybe it should be renamed to Very Butthurt CNN. And then blown the fuck out and its cable license rescinded.

Frankly, I’m disappointed that Trump dumped his koi food after Abe dumped his own food. I was really stoked that Trump went full blown chad on the nips and mega-triggered a bunch of fish-ophile shitlib weirdos who are tired of losing and need any weak sauce anti-Trump angle to keep from suiciding.