Comment Of The Week: The Greta Books For Men zlolz & etc.

from da inimitable gbfm:

the new virtue of the west
run by single white women
consist of
zero husbands
zero childrenz
zero sandwhiches made
zero mentions of the GRETA BOOKS FOR MENZ
zero mention of jesus moses plato galileo
zero diapers changed
zero dollars of patreon donations given to men
zero mentions of reforming the family courts
zero mentions of outlawing no-fault divorce
zero mentions of ending abortion
tons of mascara and lipstick and rougez

lozozoozozozozo

this is why they empowered womnez
for womenz
even when claiming the virtue of the west
are destorying it
all for $123 patreon dollarz
created via debt based butthetx
lzozozozoozozozo

Read this a few times, and you’ll realize as I have that this serrated sonnet is perhaps the distilled essence of the entirety of gbfm’s output; an economy of words, at once twisted and clear as day, aimed at the black heart of the dying West. A thousand years hence, archaeologists will dig up gbfm’s pecuneiform scribblings from among the West’s ruins and they will have their answers.

We have indeed fallen as a civilization, drawing our wisdom now from the Greta Books instead of the Great Books.

Condescension Game Update

An enterprising reader (call name: ireallymissyareally) already put my Condescension Game suggestion to use (if only the government worked this fast).

Victory. This reader’s patronus is Birthday Cat.

And now I will take a long acid bath to wash the gayness of Harry Potter references off me.

Phoney Comey Update

Clinton taint-licker Phoney Comey did his cowardly, CYA beta male shuck and jive act today before a Congressional panel, and as everyone who wasn’t a lunatic libshit knew already, Comey all but loudly proclaimed from the mountaintop that there’s nothing to the Trump-Russia collusion Fake News, and oh yeah one other thing he’s the kind of guy who’s scared to be in the same room with Trump. Admirable FBI Director we had there!

The clearest, most succinct take on the crackpot charade comes from here:

Very well said, gentlemen.  To me the key of understanding this so typical Beltway “scandal” is to look at the readily available primary evidence; in this case, that means the President’s dismissal letter to Comey.  Remember the passage in that letter that got the usual suspects riled up?

——

While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation, I nevertheless concur with the judgment of the Department of Justice that you are not able to effectively lead the Bureau.

——

Now we know from Comey’s submitted, written testimony exactly why the President used this odd phrasing.

The President was briefed by the FBI director when he was President-Elect about certain ugly charges circulating around about his time in Russia as a private citizen and was informed directly that the FBI knew there was no truth to them nor that there was any Trump “Russia link” being investigated.

Once President, as the lying press continued to go crazy with this fake story, he asked Comey again–now as his boss–to dispel the cloud that was hanging over his ability to do his job as a result of this typical bullshit Beltway media frenzy, and Comey refused, citing, as has been expertly noted here, a lame excuse.  An exasperated Trump then told Comey he expected loyalty, i.e. to actually help his boss rather than blow smoke up his ass.  Comey did nothing and allowed the press speculation to rise to an even more unbelievable level of frenzy.

The President then did this a third time, with the same result.

So, Trump fired him, and when he fired him he told Comey, and the American public, why:  Because Comey had told him directly three times that there was no such investigation but had failed to tell the American public, Congress or the press this.

Good for the President.

Anyhow, everything you need to know about the fallout from Phoney Comey Day is written on the faces of these libsters glued to their CSPAN in a Brooklyn situation room:

That face u make when reality hits & u realize u wasted 6+ months of your life on something that doesn't even exist. #RussiaHoax #ComeyDay pic.twitter.com/MkNogQMuWB

— Democrats for Trump (@YoungDems4Trump) June 8, 2017

Baboon Got Back

For your consideration:

Human brains are specialized for face recognition; chimp brains are specialized for butt recognition (!) (via)

For social species such as primates, the recognition of conspecifics is crucial for their survival. As demonstrated by the ‘face inversion effect’, humans are experts in recognizing faces and unlike objects, recognize their identity by processing it configurally. The human face, with its distinct features such as eye-whites, eyebrows, red lips and cheeks signals emotions, intentions, health and sexual attraction and, as we will show here, shares important features with the primate behind. Chimpanzee females show a swelling and reddening of the anogenital region around the time of ovulation. This provides an important socio-sexual signal for group members, who can identify individuals by their behinds. We hypothesized that chimpanzees process behinds configurally in a way humans process faces. In four different delayed matching-to-sample tasks with upright and inverted body parts, we show that humans demonstrate a face, but not a behind inversion effect and that chimpanzees show a behind, but no clear face inversion effect. The findings suggest an evolutionary shift in socio-sexual signalling function from behinds to faces, two hairless, symmetrical and attractive body parts, which might have attuned the human brain to process faces, and the human face to become more behind-like.

I’ll leave it as an exercise for the commenter to draw the obvious illicit cross-species similarity.

PS The final sentence in that abstract is possibly the funniest nerd wording I’ve ever read coming out of a ¡SCIENCE! journal.

PPS Recently I saw a queenie with steatopygia so massive, protruding, and gravity-defying I had to do a double-take, during which I mused that not only could a brother (because who else would?) prop a forty on dat cantilevered azz, he could comfortably fit a whole goddamn case of forties on it.

***

jeangray07 observes,

There’s been an interesting trend on social media, especially Instagram, where big lips, big butts and darker skin are glorified, and “white girl” features like straight hair, natural proportions, and fair skin are mocked and stigmatized. It’s like there’s a massive push to eradicate time honed beauty ideals and install more primitive ones.

The de-gentilification anti-White project of the Ugly Mendacious Left has targeted its full spectrum psy ops weapons against every available sacredness of the White race. The first step in defeating this slithery enemy is to admit when its fangs are buried in your flesh. Only then can you know to suck out the venom.

Condescension Game

A condescending line I like toss out when a fine SNHB (supernova hot babe) gives me a little shit has worked so well for me that it’s time I share it with the world. Try not to burn the source through over-use.

Context: I approach and chat up a frisky filly.

GIRL: “You seem kinda young/old/tall/short/weird/devastatingly handsome to be hanging out in this club/hitting on me/flirting with me.”

KURT EICHENWALD’S HENTAI FAP FOLDER: “You’re very perceptive.”

The line is a multiple-warhead MIRVaj because it’s short, sweet, and deploys a cargo load of female ego busting rhetorical sleights. It’s also a subtle neg (i.e., a backhanded compliment) because it teases the girl for noticing the bleeding obvious.

It subcommunicates:

1. You’re not interested in seeking the girl’s approval (sexy)
2. You don’t care what the girl thinks of you (implied higher value)
3. You can jive like the best practitioners of amused mastery (super sexy)
4. You’re cutting off any further interrogation from her concerning your presumed incompatibility with her (leader of women, social dominance)
5. You’re experienced with girls, evident by the facility with which you swat away their feigned objections (preselection)

Usually the girl will laugh in response, or if she’s witty say something like “I try”, and then it’s off to the races. After the line is delivered and alpha ape social status secured, rarely will the girl try to excavate the conversation for further reasons to object to your presence. A ZFG demonstration of value, if effective, will jolt a girl from her prepared beta male-filtering banter and open avenues of freshly unscripted flirtation.

Try out the line and report back with your progress vids!

Souldead Spinsters

As little as five years ago, the following would have been an unbelievable story, mistaken for extreme satire. Today, it’s real: Swedish bitterbitches and souldead spinsters are flooding their homeland with swarthy young muds and inviting their pet refugees into their homes to get their (liberally lubed) dusty muffs banged out.

Swedish social service workers tend to be older women that are outspoken advocates of socialism, feminism, multiculturalism, ect. It is now being alleged that many of these women actually get involved in social services in order to have sex with young immigrant men. Some Swedish media outlets are even accusing these women of “exploiting teenagers” for sex.

These women are being called”Batikhäxor,” which is sometimes translated into English as “Dye Witch.”

In America, we call them “blue-haired fatties”.

It is a derogatory Swedish slang term for an unattractive woman who is an outspoken advocate of feminism and political correctness. Similar to what is called a “Social Justice Warrior” in the USA, but specifically for older women.

The ongoing double-murder trial of Johanna Moller has brought the scandal to the forefront. Moller is accused of having an Afghan refugee murder her husband and father. During the trial, it has been alleged that she routinely plied underage refugees with drugs and alcohol and had sex with them.

Reminder that young men, even indiscriminate swarthlords with low standards, prefer younger hotter tighter female flesh to older looser wrinklier spinster sag, and have to be plied with drugs, drink, and green cards to lay with these batikhaxor:

The communist website Black Spot published an explosive anonymous column from a female social worker stating that it is common to have sex with young male refugees. The anonymous columnist says that the males are traumatized and the sex is therapeutic for them.

Gine-ological projection.

Western nations are spinning apart; the center has stopped holding. Wailing bitterbitches rend their families and gnash their gashes for rapefugee romance; souldead spinsters whose porky bodies and unfeminine demeanor have turned off their own men delude themselves that juvie jihadis truly, deeply love them and that rekindled spark in their old leathery snappers is worth trashing their nations.

Our shared single White woman problem vexes the entire White West. We solve it, or we perish. Simple as that.

Islam As Anti-Christianity

Lawrence Auster (RIP, a true shtetl of mettle mensch), discussed William Muir’s 1878 The Life of Mahomet and drew the apt comparison that Muhammed was essentially the opposite of Jesus, the anti-Jesus, and that this says everything you need to know about the type of people who are drawn to the message of Islam. (via)

I’ve just read the fascinating third chapter of William Muir’s 1878 The Life of Mahomet, “The Belief of Mahomet in His Own Inspiration.” In the great tradition of 19th century scholarship, Muir is an author who sees both the trees and the forest. He works closely from the original sources, presenting the facts about Mahomet (I’ll use Muir’s old-fashioned spelling here) as we have them from the Moslem tradition, while also offering his own critical assessment of those facts. He has a highly articulated point of view about Mahomet that seems to me exceptionally insightful.

Muir shows how Mahomet became convinced, or claimed, that his own thoughts were Allah speaking to him, so that every sentence in the Koran, every single word, is believed to come directly from Allah. While Muir doesn’t deny Mahomet’s spiritual experiences that led to the writing of the Koran, he calls Mahomet’s claim of divine authorship a forgery, since he was falsely claiming that Allah was the author of the Koran rather than himself. By placing this divine imprimatur on his own thoughts, he made them impervious to analysis. To this day, it is virtually impossible for Moslems to think critically about the contents of the Koran.

After pointing out that Mahomet himself occasionally worried that it was genii who were speaking to him rather than Allah, Muir does something rather brilliant. He demonstrates, step by step, that Jesus’ responses to the three temptations of Satan were the exact opposite of Mahomet’s behavior. Whereas Jesus refused to use his divine powers for his personal advantage or for power, Mahomet often used his (false) claim of direct divine authorship of the Koran for purely personal ends (such as his various murders and marriages), and, of course, to make his religious teaching into an earthly, conquering, political force. In other words, Mahomet yielded to the temptations that Jesus rejected. Therefore, Muir concludes (and he calls this a suggestion rather than a dogma), if Mahomet was indeed inspired by a supernatural being, it was not God but someone else.

In this connection, Andrew Bostom in his research for his book on Islam has discovered and shared with me a remarkable Persian illustration of Muhammad at the massacre of the Koreizites, a Jewish tribe of Medina. It’s a famous episode in Muslim history. Muhammad, whose face is veiled, is seen sitting with his lieutenants in a kind of plaza while the killings, which he has ordered, proceed in front of him. The illustration is highly significant because it shows Muhammad “at work,” as it were. This is what he did as Prophet and founder of a religion. Nothing could bring out more clearly the world of difference between Muhammad and Jesus. While Jesus, innocent of sin, allowed himself to be executed for the sins of mankind, Muhammad ordered the mass executions of innocent men.

Getting back to William Muir’s remarkable biography, he quotes and comments on many passages from the Koran, making that book somewhat accessible to me for the first time, since whenever I have tried to read it on my own, I’ve been quickly overcome by a combination of boredom and revulsion. It occurs to me that the primitiveness of the Koran, the endless reiteration of the theme, “Either you follow Allah, or you are a piece of garbage and you are going to burn in hell,” is like taking the judgmental aspect of the Hebrew and Christian scriptures at its most judgmental, reworking it into the crudest possible form, and making that into the basis of an entire religion. And perhaps that is the reason Islam, unlike Judaism and Christianity, was so successful in winning over the Arabs: it appealed to their simple, fierce, tribal mentality in a way that Judaism and Christianity could not.

Why are the world’s violent and primitive attracted to Islam? Executioner’s Summary: it’s Islam’s appeal to the base instincts. The sand people are on the whole a stupid, clannish, hot-headed, inbred lot who have populated the world in numbers well above their natural state of existence thanks to the oil money and exported Western technology, and so it is their religion appeases and amplifies their under-evolved natures and provides justification for their burgeoning populations to expand and conquer infidel lands. You’ll note, too, Islam’s appeal to prison blacks, for similar reason: dr. feelgood and Hulk SMASH for the brutishly dumb.

Christianity is the religion of the higher IQ, the more empathic, the bigger-souled, the guilt-based (inner morality); it’s a religion for a people whose impulse is to transcend their human failings and better themselves, rather than to embrace their will to filth and stamp a seal of approval on their avaricious barbarity. Now of course there are exceptions, but in the sweep of history the general observation holds up, and continues to hold up.

I’m of the opinion that a religion is less an influence on culture and society than it is a manifest revelation of the genetic foundation of the people who profess belief in it. Religion serves the God of Biomechanics, not the other way around, and over time a religion is amended and elaborated, or in the case of Islam distilled to its thuggish essence, to satisfy the soulful yearnings and emotional demands of its followers. Christianity, in other words, could never be felt the same way or interpreted with the same keenness outside of the social context of civilized White Europeans and their diaspora. The same is true for Islam, which must necessarily remain chained to the jungle hearts of its tropical and desert wasteland base of believers (who will never realize this until they force Armageddon upon the world).

Regrettably, Christianity, like its people, has “out-evolved” itself — it evolved to where it was always logically heading faster and more completely than it could counter-evolve defenses against exploitation of its core tenets — and now waits in a horribly weakened condition for enemies to burn its cathedrals and piss on the gravestones of its saints and heroes.

Those who think the White West can be unyoked from Christianity and not just survive but thrive are fools; Christianity can no more be excised from the West than charity, empathy, genius, poetry, and high trust can be cut out from Western societies without permanently altering the character of the people. Discarding Christianity is taking a hatchet to a part of the essence of European man and expecting him to walk off the operating table unchanged. Instead, what’s happened is de-Christianized European man lays naked and defenseless on his gurney, once lamenting and now begging the world’s demon spawn to put the final fading glimmers of his listless spirit to the breaking wheel.