Feeds:
Posts
Comments

The Expired Woman

How does a woman let decades slip by and watch forlornly as she tumblrs from bodacious to barren? By deluding herself that her biological clock has more minutes on it than it actually does.

Sarah Haas, 35, says she feels like she has about five years to decide whether to have children.

*facepalm* At 35, the smart bet is that the lifespan on her womb has already reached the end. If she’s lucky, she’ll push out one underweight autistic problem child allergic to every food group except soy before her last egg is unceremoniously expunged in a portentous hot flash by age 40.

One can blame the feminist grrlpower gaystream media for pumping women’s hamster cages full of lies about their fertility and sexual market staying power, but ultimately it’s the fault of these women for hoping wishing fantasizing and persisting in the Fake Belief that they are just as sexy and, coincidentally, ripely fertile at 35 as they were at 25 and even more so at 19.

For Haas, 35, though, the assumptions are hard. She was in two long-term relationships, each lasting nearly a decade. If those didn’t result in a child, it must be because she didn’t want them to, right? Nope. It just happened that way. It was just life.

Cheap, widespread, and easy birth control has been a more potent Darwinian selection force than wars and famine. We are just now seeing the effects of that unnatural selection on the populations that have had effective birth control the longest, and the verdict is in: overrun by more fertile barbarians.

She separates it into “before” and “after.” In previous generations, many women had kids “before” — before career, before travel, before other elements of life. Now, Haas sees people who think of having children as “after” — after you have built your own, individual life.

Careergrrlism is civilizational death.

Haas can list the reasons that now isn’t the perfect time: Her career isn’t in an ideal place. Financially, it would be tough. Her current relationship is pretty new.

The prologue of Idiocracy, the most prescient movie of the past twenty years, nailed this female solipsism.

And, that biological feeling, that hit-you-in-your-gut urge that some women feel so deeply, has never struck Haas.

“I know a lot of women who know that they want to be mothers,” she says. “They know it. They don’t know how; they don’t know when; maybe they choose a life that doesn’t give them that, but they know they want to be mothers. And because either I can’t trust that feeling, or I don’t have it, I do wonder if that means that I shouldn’t. But at the same time, I know that I love children, and I know that I would be an amazing mother.”

Tragically, she won’t be making that decision for children; the God of Biomechanics will decide for her. And His avatar of intervention in human affairs — evolution — is a ruthless, merciless reaper of self-deluding fools. Her anti-natalism kind will, in short order, be washed from the earth into Hades along a Pill-polluted ovary-dead River Cysts, and we who have eaten the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Poolside and Evil can only hope that the barrenesses of the West don’t take White Civilization with them.

PS The Expired Woman is closely related to the Inspired Woman.

This is a homoshoot of NATO wives plus Melania Trump, winnergirl.

Behold soft, plush Europe, telegraphing for all the world’s barbarians that She is ready to bend over and take their invader seed. The rump roaster in the back is the “””husband””” of Luxembourg’s gay prime sinister, which I guess makes him the bottom.

And wtf is going on with some of these Euroshrews? How about old chicken legs on the far left trying to pull off the sexy teen girl look. Lady, don’t go above the knee if your entire leg is the same width as your knee. And who’s the broad in the tent and head covering? The Manchester bomber’s mother? Nice blood splatter dress on that middle giantess (probably Dutch). At least the two on the far right look bangable. Melania as usual looks great, a welcome change from the Jane Goodall jungle subject we had to endure looking at for eight years.

Anyhow, the alpha male’s wife is always the youngest, hottest, tightest, and most elegant of the bunch. (Luxembourg puts his hand to his chest, “why thank you!”) When men have options, they choose wisely.

It’s generally a good idea to avoid those with indiscriminate tastes and passions. The wind blows them whither, and the buffet table bloats them thither. AKA NO FAT CHICKS.

Dominance Game

Male dominance is the irresistible force that compels steadfast followers and unfurled furrows. It’s the secret sauce of seduction, and no man serious about luring the fare sex neglects to cultivate an air of authority and social dominance.

Emailer Lurky McAesthetics is astonished by the power of male dominance to arouse women.

Long time lurker and admirer. Came upon this nugget of game on one of my friends’ cellphones, he is tall, good looking, and id call him a charming narcissistic asshole (have heard him tell girls on more than one occasion that she should feel lucky he took time out from admiring how sexy he is to talk to her….it works more times than i expect it to)

Haha, that’s funny, and the sort of cocky banter that would work for any man, not just good-looking men. If anything, it would work BETTER for average-looking men, if delivered with a deadpan expression and convincing sincerity.

I have met the girl he was talking to mid 20s, hard 8, fancy, used to men slobbering over her, and he apparently talked to her for 5 minutes when we were at a bar (big city, USA) and then invited himself over to her place

Men invade, women invite.

and broke her self-imposed 18 month hiatus from “dating dicks”, she is feisty (overheard their first convo) but subdued around him.

Every woman adores a caesar.

I always wondered why she behaved like that around him until i saw his texts to her (relevant info redacted for privacy) even being aesthetic it just blew my mind that such a girl was just beggin to be reframed (?) dominantly. Without further ado, the text exchange. Please feel free to use to to educate any beta pussy-pedestalizing herbs (he told her he would throw her in a sac in a cat costume instead of getting a cat) Red Box response is his).

A masterful seduction reads like a symphony sounds: uplifting, transcendent, inspiring. Note that no words were needed to send this lass in a tailspin; just a picture, a cream meme if you will, signifying everything that women love about men, and what women want to do with men who are worthy of their pussies: they want to submit, eagerly, with happy abandon.

Women’s eagerness to submit is partly a function of the paucity of available men who can inspire their submission or have the guts to demand, through word or action, their submission. No crevasse of the female hindbrain is deeper than the one that contains the ür-desire to relinquish her body, heart, and soul totally to a man exuding that I AM A GOLDEN GOD attitude.

PS Some will waver that good-looking men have more leeway to act dominant; that women will forgive them this indiscretion that would sink less attractive men. That is a bad misreading of female nature. The dominant handsome man bests the submissive handsome man EVERY TIME. Although women don’t mind a man easy on the eyes, it’s his alluring dominance and entitlement (who does this man thinks he is? he must be someone important) that really snares their hearts and juices their cunts. Now this isn’t to say nebbishy men should charge out of the gate wielding a cream meme like the one above; there must be consideration given to women’s trite first impressions, and that means for the less conspicuously dominant man a sudden gear shift from niceguy beta to ass-slapping alpha will trigger female creep alarms. He should avoid this obstacle by setting a subtly dominant tone early and often, so that when he deploys the cream memes later they don’t land with a thud but rather a throb.

The Chateau is long on record observing that a man’s force of personality — his charisma — is a powerful lure for women. As women are unlike men in some very fundamental aspects, it benefits men to understand which ways women differ from men and to tailor their seduction technique to press women’s particular arousal buttons.

One major difference between the sexes is the emphasis each places on desirable traits in the opposite sex. Shortly and sweetly, women are holistic mate evaluators, men are visual mate evaluators. Women want the whole package, but are especially aroused by men with intoxicatingly jerkboy-ish attitudes who stand apart from the masses of “So what do you do for a living?” beta males. Men want hot babes, end of story. More sweetly:

Men dig beauty.
Chicks dig power.

Male power is projected through various social cues, including dominance (over men and women), humor, confidence, cockiness, entitlement, wit….and creativity. All these traits fall into the “male personality” category, which broadly speaking one can call “charisma”, which is why the CH “Dating Market Value Test for Men” includes questions such as:

13.  When was the last time you went to a house party?

Within the past month:  +1 point
Between one month and one year ago:  0 points
Over one year ago:  -1 point

14.  Have people besides your family called you funny?

None:  -1 point
A few have:  0 points
Nearly everyone who knows me:  +1 point

[…]

21.  You’ve just met a cute girl in a club and have been talking with her for five minutes when she abruptly changes the topic to a raunchy conversation about her multiorgasmic ability.  You respond with:

(A) a huge grin and an eager “Damn! That is HOT!”
(B) a look of mild disdain.
(C) a raised eyebrow while saying “Hey, thanks for the medical report.”

If you answered (A), subtract a point.
If (B), no points.
If (C), add a point.

The background is to set up another *PREEN* HERE COMES ¡SCIENCE! ONCE AGAIN TO SLOBBER THE CH KNOBBER:

In the ruthless world of the mating game, plain-looking men instinctively know that being funny, smart or poetic helps to compensate for a less-than-stellar exterior.

That gut feeling has now gained scientific validation from an unusual study published Wednesday.

Average-looking men become more alluring when women sense the man has an imaginative spark, it found.

Charisma can vault an average beta schlub past hunky men and into the hearts of women. This is vindication of a core CH concept.

But for women, sadly, there may not be the same boost.

Indeed, one experiment suggests that less attractive women even worsen their mating chances if they show mental zing.

This too is vindication of a core CH concept: men don’t much care about women’s wit and wisdom as long as she lookgood. In fact, men are a little bit TURNED OFF by women who have interesting personalities that could make the men’s personalities seem lame in comparison. (The same happens with wealthy or over-educated women; men don’t like to be with women whom they perceive as competitors, or as possessing traits in sufficient quantity and quality that diminish the attractiveness value of those same traits in men. This is why it’s arousing to men when women seem vulnerable and admiring.)

The results showed that men with less attractive faces get a big boost in the popularity contest if they show a creative touch, Watkins found.

“Creative guys with less attractive faces were almost identical in attractiveness to really good looking guys who were not as creative,” he told AFP in a phone interview.

Male smarts are pointless for attracting women unless those smarts are put to use crafting an intriguing, creative personality. In other words, more storytelling, less logical explaining.

The top-ranked men were those considered to be both physically attractive and creative.

Also does not contradict CH teachings. Looks matter less for men’s romantic success than they do for women’s romantic success, but that doesn’t mean male looks don’t matter at all.

For women, though, the news is not so good. Looks remain paramount.

In one experiment, creativeness did nothing to boost the allure of attractive women — and it even reduced the appeal of less attractive women.

I enjoy being with witty funny women….who are super cute. But that’s because my wit and humor is at the infinity-eth percentile. The point being, the stablest, happiest relationships are those in which the man is superior to the woman in all ways except looks. Women want….NEED…to look up to a man to feel love for him. Men want….NEED….to know that a woman is looking up to him to feel loved by her.

Why would women rate creativity among men so highly?

Watkins pointed to evolutionary biology — the hidden criteria that drive us to seek the best mate for ensuring healthy offspring and their survival.

“Women on average are a more selective sex when it comes to choosing romantic partners,” he said.

Imagination and inspiration may be “a proxy for intelligence,” he suggested.

“Creativity is thought to be a signal that an individual can invest time and effort into a particular task or can see things in novel ways that may be useful for survival.”

Evolution works on the human hindbrain by hiding its intentions. Women aren’t thinking “Oh, I really want to sex with a high IQ man who will be better at providing for our future children”; what they’re thinking is “Wow, this man makes me feel great. He’s so funny! Wew is that a love puddle in my yoga pants?”

That means nerds and poets are at a big disadvantage in online dating, where decisions to swipe left or right — to shun or show interest — are often based on just a glance.

“Certain platforms that we have now for dating might not be favourable for assessing people on more complex attributes,” Watkins said.

This is another vindication of a CH tenet: online dating severely restricts the range in which men can display their mate value to women. Use online dating as an appetizer, never the main meal, especially if you aren’t a top 5% man in the looks department. If you’re an exclusive online dater, you are handicapping yourself if you’re a man with that ineffable jerkboy charm that women crave in doses of close physical proximity. It’ll be much easier for you to get across your charms face-to-face than through the Zuckerborg Dehumanization Autistoportal.

A leftoid freak (black) judge (are these scumbags factory-pressed now?) ruled against Trump’s eminently sensible muslim immigration ban, (and not one day after yet another muslim atrocity), misusing the Establishment Clause as a jizz wipe to clean up his orgasm of feelz.

What a fucking disgrace. The Establishment Clause doesn’t apply to the whole world. It’s meant for Americans. If the whole world falls under the First Amendment’s protections, then in theory American voters, through their representatives, have no right to restrict the flow of invaders from any foreign country in any number at any time. The Zeroeth Amendment, as Sailer calls it.

WELP that’s a wrap folks. A Constitutional Crisis is coming, courtesy of rabid virtue sniveling anti-White shitlib nation wreckers. Let’s all take a moment to recall what happened the last time we had a major Constitutional Crisis.

And now a moment to reflect on what’s happening in our homelands today:

If there aren’t changes, BIG changes, soon, to redirect the Vector Negative that the West is traveling, the shit will hit the fan harder than even the most dedicated doomsday prepper could have imagined. Reminder that “checks and balances” applies to curbing excesses of the Judiciary as well as the Legislative and Executive. Which means (in the words of Anti-Gnostic):

Well, step two is people beginning to ask how many tank battalions the judges have.

Like I’ve said, there needs to be a culling of shitlibs from ALL American institutions of power. The shitlib saturation point has been reached and surpassed in nearly every important field:

Culling, not debate, is our only avenue remaining to make our voices heard and our votes count.

What’s at stake and coming for us: an enormous, unstoppable tsunami of Dirt World detritus.

Reframe Of The Day

This is both a Game post and a politics post. Enjoy this explicit two-fer, because it’ll be one of those rare times you can witness the see-sawing CH haters implode from cogdis.

The reframe is a powerful Game technique, capable of stopping shit testing bitches cold, reigniting stalled banter, and easing the apprehensions of egg-guarding girls. The reframe is essentially perception management, in which one can alter the value of something (such as oneself) by changing the context in which that thing is understood.

A classic of the genre:

GIRL: I bet I’m not the first girl you’ve said that to.

POPE BUTTPLUG’S ALT-NEMESIS: I’ve learned what to say from girls just like you.

One more PUA classic:

POPE BUTTPLUG’S SATANIC TRUMPDREAM: Hey girl, don’t get handsy! You’ve gotta wine and dine me first, I’m not that easy.

***

Swinging this around to the politics angle, we can apply the reframe to a current event that has shitlibs twitching with gotcha! tingles.

The story: A trickle down media dweeb and walking nebbish caricature Ben Jacobs got body slammed by a Montana Republican pol named Gianforte. It’s being reported with indignant tones suggestive of a major scandal but honestly it’s the best news I’ve heard all day! Who hasn’t wanted to remind these dorky uptalking shitlib manlets that high school never really ends for them?

The reframe: “A reporter was tackled by a Montana Republican? Don’t give in to fear and hate. If you do, the Montana Republicans will have won.”

Another reframe, courtesy of Gabber @CorneliusRye:

In the aftermath of this attack, I fear the backlash that the Republican and Alt-Right communities will have to endure. 😢

We stand in solidarity with them.

Post note: On cue, Paul Ryan has cucked his way into the news by asking Gianforte to apologize. If CuckRyan had instead said anything akin to the reframes above (instead of groveling for an apology from Gianforte), my estimation of him would have gone from AIDS VECTOR to T LEVEL DETECTED.

%d bloggers like this: