Destroy The 9th Circuit Of Hell

Yesterday, the 9th Circuit of Hell ruled that the stay of Trump’s travel ban from seven Muslim countries (a stay for which a migrant-adopting cucked Judge Robarts in WA state literally made up the basis for out of whole cloth and feelz) was legal and would continue.

The traitors who sit on the 9th Circuit of Hell (headquarters: San Francisco, CA) essentially ruled that the President and the Executive Branch have no discretion to set the nation’s immigration policies. This is the unavoidable precedence that is established by their decision.

Allow me to cut to the quick with this leetle shiv I have at the ready:

The judiciary is corrupt. The shitlib-infested courts are black robed enforcers and propagandists of Democreep legislation and Democreep executive orders, and act as a “check” only on conservative legislation or Republican President EOs.

The courts, iow, are completely biased and partial adjudicators of the law, which they now define into existence as whatever meets the anti-White shitlib standard of excellence.

Checks and balances apply to the judiciary too, and we’re well past the time when the courts need to be brought to heel. Trump was elected by the people; judges are appointed. Trump has more legitimacy than the 9th circuit court because he is a more direct conduit to the American people’s voice.

I see three post-9th Circuit of Hell options for Trump:

1. Follow his ban with more Trump EOs that shitlibs have to endlessly parry. (flood the zone)
2. Wait for Gorsuch confirmation, and bring the refugee ban to SCOTUS where that court will HAVE to weigh in its favor, or lose legitimacy
3. Crush the judiciary

Point 3 will require a GOP Congress that Trump can rely on to strip the judiciary of power, which is far from a given. There is also the quasi-military option; aka a show of force. Trump just goes ahead and commands LEO and other border authorities to follow his EOs and ignore the judges. And finally there’s the FDR nuclear option: threaten to pack SCOTUS and reduce the power of each individual justice.

Point 2 also requires faith in the sanity and loyalty of Judge Gorsuch to the American people. (we’ve been burned before by noms turned libshit….). Frustratingly, evidence has emerged that Gorsuch may be a crypto-liberal in the mold of David Souter.

Point 1 is the easiest for Trump to succeed with in the short term, but also the least damaging to the anti-White Left in the long term, for it leaves their stranglehold on the judiciary in place, and cauterizes the Left’s framing of the citizenship and border issues.

I’m partial to number three. Blow this mother up. Pat Buchanan and Daniel Horowitz agree: It is time to dismantle the 9th Circuit of Hell. And that is only the first step to get this activist globohomo judicial tyranny to bend the knee to Heritage America.

Immigration, borders, and the National Question are the Gom Jabbar/Pain Box and the Voight-Kampff tests of humanity rolled into one. Will the nation find its core humanness, or will it withdraw to nation-wrecking instinct and embrace a lack of empathy for fellow Americans?

Demography is the Left’s source of power. If they lose on the National Question, they lose on all the other globalist initiatives they want to visit on ordinary Americans, because no amount of miseries heaped on Heritage America is too much to the anti-White Left. This is why the Left will fight to the brink of Civil War II for their “right” to spread the Constitution thin enough to cover the entire world’s ingrate indigents.

Like Love, if you indiscriminately extend US Rights to everyone in the world, then Rights mean nothing.

Pathological altruism will kill us, or we will kill it. And killing an idea has historically all too often required….well, you fill in the blank.

Trolling As A Pickup Tactic

Reader irksome1 suggests a universally-applicable cousin to the Birthday Cat emoji sabotage of grandiose female self-perception.

CH, I came up with a troll so simple, so powerful, it’s like a cold fusion briefcase nuke. It works as a comment on posts of nearly any topic (or as a responsive text, perhaps), due to its perfect simplicity. It doesn’t matter if it’s some retarded political post, party selfies, pictures of her dinner, or whatever pop cult degeneracy she idly finds entertaining. It is best when the posts aims to be ~empowering~ to women sorts of agitprop. The comment is:

“ASKING FOR IT”

I like it. It’s sufficiently ambiguous — “asking for what?”, she wonders — yet pointedly provocative — “who does this badboy think he’s talking to!”, she tingles — that it will spur additional inquiries from the woman so addressed. Additional inquiries that could lead to nutritional intrusions.

Another ambiguously graphical emoji I’ve lately been sending to ladies is this one:

Like Birthday Cat, it’s an all-purpose response to just about anything a girl texts or posts. She yaps about Trump, or TweeVee, or fashion, or my reticence to indulge her with immediate and glowing respectful appraisals of her awesomeness, I pass along this graphic illustrating the ideal womanly “swayback” that maximally arouses men…..and she’s left in the defensive crouch, furiously hamstering what it could mean and feeling just the right amount of unease that the pic has something to say about her own sexual worth.

Meme magic is real, and it’ll get you erected just as it got Trump elected.

Jewish Censorship

Readers Moses exposes a tentacle of the mighty underworld octopus of Jewish censorship and consent manufacture.

OT re: censorship. I didn’t know it was this bad.

Yesterday I posted 2 comments on a story in “The Hill” about the 9th Circuit Court’s ruling striking down Trump’s temporary immigration ban.

Guess which comment was removed?

First comment:

People who voted for Trump deserved to get beaten with metal rods by masked blackshirts at Berkeley.

Second comment:

“The plaintiffs in the case, Washington and Minnesota, maintain that the order violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from favoring one religion over another.”

If that’s the case, then the Jackson-Vanik Amendment to the Trade Act of 1974 is unconstitutional as well. That amendment favored Jews from the Soviet Union for immigration to the USA. It did NOT favor people of other religions for immigration which was effective negative discrimination against other religions and positive discrimination in favor of Jews.

The second comment was simply a statement of fact and connecting the dots on consistency of Constitutional principles. Yet it was deemed verboten and removed.

The first comment expressed [sarcastic] glee at political violence against Trump supporters. Yet it was left unmolested.

Let that sink in for a minute. The Hill management cannot bear even FACTS that might adversely affect Jews or perception of Jews. Yet they condone by non-removal the cheering of political violence.

I was curious, so I checked the management of The Hill. From Wikipedia:

The paper was founded in 1994 and was published by New York businessman Jerry Finkelstein. The paper is currently owned by his son Jimmy Finkelstein, who serves as its chairman.

My takeaways:
1) Every. Single. Time.
2) If you think Skypes are not a threat to America you need to have your head examined.
3) The left hates you. They want you dead. Literally.

I know Mencius Moldbug (né Curtis Yarvin) likes to refer to this octopus of nation-state orchiectomy as “The Cathedral”, but it’s a bit more precise to call it “The Synagogue”. Or, if you’re like me and prefer an inclusive label that captures both disproportionate Jewish anti-Gentilic malignancy and numerically impressive shitlib Gentile anti-BadWhite malignancy, “The Leftoid Equalist Hivemind”.

PS The Establishment Clause applies to citizens of the United States. It doesn’t mean every Juan, Dak, and Habib in the world enjoys the same First Amendment right to plop en masse onto America’s shores. The fact that anti-White shitlibs have twisted the Judiciary to rule in favor of such a lunatic interpretation of the Establishment Clause proves just how far past the date we are for a massive and thorough house-cleaning of the courts. By force, if necessary.

“Days Of Rage”

I’ve been meaning to link to this great post at Status 451, which is a review of the Bryan Burrough book “Days of Rage” and a look at the late 60s/early 70s political upheaval and violence in America. The categorical differences in Left/Right revolutionary fervor are also examined, with a special consideration for the now largely memory-holed murderous violence committed by radical black activist groups.

In short, the near-term prognosis for our nation is not good.

This is the difference between the hard Left & hard Right: you can be a violent leftist radical and go on to live a pretty kickass life. This is especially true if you’re a leftist of the credentialed class: Ph.D. or J.D.

The big three takeaways for me about Weatherman, when it comes to political violence in America as we might see it in 2016:

1. Radicalism can come from anywhere. The Weathermen weren’t oppressed, or poor, or anything like that. They were hard leftists. That’s it.
2. Sustained political violence is dependent on the willing cooperation of admirers and accomplices. The Left has these. The Right does not.
3. Not a violent issue, but a political one: ethnic issues involving access to power can both empower and derail radical movements.

Interestingly, a lot of the 60s/70s political violence originated with revolutionary groups based out of California and the West in general. Agnostic would say this fact follows from the basic character of Far West Americans, who are rootless itinerants and radical individualists prone to falling into cults and infiltrating mainstream religions.

What does it mean for us? First, let’s be blunt: most political violence is not going to be as well-trained & highly disciplined as FALN. You’re not going to see that level of skill again, unless the Cubans decide they want to come to play. What you might see, on both sides, is what to me is the most amazing part of the FALN story: its parasitization of the Episcopal Church.

And the important point that Leftist murderers are simply more tolerated, even coddled, by the establishment:

The other takeaway: again, Lefty radicals have more opportunities and more acceptance from their mainstream than Righty ones. I don’t see Eric Rudolph getting clemency, no matter the administration. He shouldn’t. Nor should have FALN.

A new Turchin cycle (a Fourth Turning) is descending upon us:

But it’s the implications of Bryan Burrough’s book that scare the willies out of me.

I am afraid that the United States is in for political violence in 2017. It could be as bad as or worse than the 1970s. I have some ideas as to what some of it may look like. It really isn’t pleasant to think about.

***

I’m going to talk about some nasty things here. I do not want any of it. But some or all of it could happen. Some of it already is. In 2017, I am very pessimistic about America’s future, to the point that I think the country should seriously consider a National Divorce.

Everyone feeling nice and at ease now? Good, let’s get started.

Let’s not mince words: the United States of America is currently engaged in a cold Civil War.

***

So maybe we can hope that political violence in the US, ’70s-style, won’t go all-out for massive numbers of deaths? Well… maybe. The way I see it, domestic conflict in the United States could operate in basically four stages:

1. cold Civil War
2. targeted political violence, mostly short of murder
3. political violence with murder as the default
4. Civil War II

The United States should start seriously talking about National Divorce before we get to stage 3.

We’re in Stage 1 now. Stages 2 and 3 are what we’re concerned with: the public getting mobilized. What would that look like, on Left and Right?

People tend to think that the Right will be an awesome, horrific force in political violence. The SPLC’s donations depend on that idea. Righties tell themselves that *of course* they’d win a war against Lefties. Tactical Deathbeast vs. Pajama Boy? No contest. Why, Righties have thought about what an effective domestic insurrection would look like. Righties have written books and manifestos!

It’s horseshit.

The truth: the Left is a lot more organized & prepared for violence than the Right is, and has the advantage of a mainstream more supportive of it.

What about the pro-Trump military?

Righties might go, “Yeah, but the military!” Yes, the military runs very heavily Righty. As do the cops. To which my answer is: if we get Civil War II, how many Americans do you think the U.S. military is willing to run over with tanks?

And that’s all the author says about it. A pat assertion, with which I disagree. If the situation heats up enough, like it did just before the first Civil War, then the military (red state through and through) will be more than willing to crush leftist Americans in the streets. Or turn their guns on Leftist institutions like academia, federal buildings, and media headquarters.

The Chateau Civil War II Doomsday Clock now calculates that the chances of bloody internecine war within the next ten years is more likely than not.

Why The Hivemind Left Resists Realtalk

Leftist institutions — NGOs, unis, gov, media, etc — are existentially threatened by sex and race realism because their work is devoted to the opposite premise. Everything they do, their reason for being, their very purpose, is based on the false belief that intervention can make everyone like GoodWhites. Imagine you spent your life believing in, and working towards, one value system, and happy heretics armed with undeniable truths about humanity told you your work is a fruitless endeavor. You’d be shattered.

The Hivemind Left, in other words, resists ego death. And, tautologically speaking, the human ego is the most powerful force in the cosmos. The ego that is particularly susceptible to shrieking in pain under an onslaught of contradicting knowledge is even more powerful in those for whom social status and feelings of self-worth are tightly wound with intellectual preening and ideological rightness.

Gentleshitlords, there aren’t many BTFOs bigger than that.

Shiv Of The Week: Still Single Tho Girl

There are friendzonings so cold that men reading about them from hundreds of galactic zones away can feel the chill in their bones.

I’ve seen masterful vivisections of orbiters before, but this LJBF scalpel removed the fool beta’s id and placed it outside to sizzle under the hot sun. One might say our Good Christian Girl crucified Daniel’s upstart apostolic lurch.

Note that this beta orbiter is not gay. If he was, the girl would not feel compelled to append a brutally perfunctory #stillsingletho tag to her post; if the beta was gay, she would know all her friends know that he’s gay and the tag would make no sense. This was specifically a tag intended to remind both the orbiter and any real men reading that her pussy is OFF-LIMITS to the orbiter and IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE to any man with the BALLS to JUST SAY NO to the friendzone.

I hereby declare Still Single Tho Girl to be the female equivalent of Skittles Man, Nah Man, and Bring The Movies guy. She takes emotional fulfillment from a hapless dopey beta male orbiter without giving an ounce of her sexual fulfillment in return, just as Skittles Man takes sexual fulfillment from his hapless smitten girlfriends without giving an ounce of his emotional fulfillment to them. Well OK, he gives about 12 ounces….of Skittles.

Incels and insols are not the loneliest people in the world. That distinction belongs to the friendzoned beta orbiter whose romantic loneliness is compounded by the excruciating juxtaposition of the physical and emotional nearness of his oneitis with the cosmic immensity of her sexual remoteness.

There is no loneliness worse than the tortured loneliness.

I have a powerful message for lovelorn beta male orbiters stuck in the gravitational pull of the friendzone black hole: Paying a hooker for sex is more dignified than pretending to enjoy being blue-balled by your cold-hearted lust object.

(“Why cold-hearted?”, asks the pleb. I’ll tell you why. Because EVERY chick wielding the power of the friendzone knows EXACTLY what her emotional tampon wants from her, and yet #ShePersists in draining her sexually thwarted beta buddyboy of the last drops of his dignity and often while feeding him just enough morsels of hope to keep him tagging around in asexual limbo and giving her what she wants from him….which in this case is Top Golf, dinner, flowers, ice cream, and horseback riding. The horse was her sexual outlet. Cucked by a horse!)

Recall an ancient CH maxim: Sexless resource extraction is the female version of the uncommitted sexual extraction practiced by alpha males.

If after our unconscionably stoic beta sucker Daniel gets his head straight upon blowing his load in a hooker’s strait, he can go here to read about methods for curing his oneitis, and thus releasing himself from the souldeath of the friendzone.

Nordic Feminism Vs Jewish Feminism

The two most virulent and mentally handicapping strains (perhaps the only two strains worth noting) of feminism in America are Nordic Feminism (NF) and Jewish Feminism (JF). Those BitterBitchMarch protest photos of screeching SJW fish-mouthed feminists? Odds are those lovely ladies have a dollop of Nord DNA. And all the feminist bilge pouring out of the anti-White Krull machine known as Hollywood and academia? That’s created by Jewish women (and their astoundingly cucked men).

Commenter PA explores the two feminism camps and how they may differ.

There is a strain of feminism native to Nordics that’s driven to break boys. It comes from a fear of strong or dissolute men. What makes it different from Jewish feminism is that it doesn’t seek to corrupt the famiIy, only to subordinate the famiIy to the woman’s authority. Those kinds of women aren’t inclined toward hypergamy — they despise alphas, marry betas whom they might henpeck but to whom they’ll stay faithful, and they will castrate their sons.

I think that’s basically right, except that NFs only superficially despise alpha men; I’ve known too many NFs with sexual histories that could read like instruction manuals for how to fall into bed with alpha badboys and bitch about the inevitable pump and dump for months afterward.

Same for JFs; they’re very adept at rationalizing a vocal hatred for masculine alphas, but when push comes to love, they can’t resist the crow of the cocksure cock.

I also have noticed, to buttress PA’s insight, that NFs do often settle down into egalitarian anhedonia with the wimpiest honey-do betaboy male feminists. JFs are more ethnocentric in their settling calculus, preferring the betas of their own tribe, male feminist or not, or when they out-marry, preferring to engage in long-term subterfuge to mold their goy toys into affiliative Jews. The NFs tend to choose born-cucked hubbies who come pre-equipped with the whole suite of insipid feminist fantasy beliefs.

Another difference (besides the relatively greater ethnocentricity of the JF and the more sincere universalism of the NF) is the anger that fuels their man-hatred. Give or take the expected slate of exceptions, in my observation NFs are ANGRIER about their feminism than are JFs, who wield their feminist ideology more like a lawyerly brief to undermine goyciety than like an emotional call to arms against the patriarchy which will never go anywhere but in the battlefield of their fevered imaginations.

It’s all a bit odd when one considers that

1. Judaism is traditionally a patriarchal religion and
2. the Nordic countries are among the most sexually dichotomous in practice, according to research, where men take man jobs and woman take woman jobs and physically their women are among the most beautiful on earth.

I’ll open the floor to more discussion of this topic, since it’s a fascinating one that potentially can reveal a lot about the female-driven leftoid hysteria and demand for open borders to the swarth world that is currently gripping America and fated to destroy the nation as we’ve known her.