What the shitlibs bleating about “fascist Trump” don’t understand (or don’t care to understand) is that our president, Gay Mulatto, fits the criteria of a fascist dictator using the government as a tool to exact petty revenge on his political enemies.
Peter Thiel crossed Gay Mulatto and Gawker, (in my book Thiel’s role in destroying Gawker elevates him to a genuine American hero), and now it’s payback time. Recall this is the same spiteful, “peevish princeling” [ed: credit PA] Gay Mulatto who sicced the IRS on conservative political groups. And who ordered Eric Holder to make an example of an innocent White cop in Ferguson.
Gawker and the rest of the shitlib media whore websites are octopus arms of the Democrats and their Muslimist leader, tasked with properly indoctrinating Americans to accept without question the inevitability of the White-hating Diversitopia. When Thiel cut an anti-White propaganda arm off, and supported the man (Trump) best positioned to forever tarnish the Gay Mulatto’s legacy, his transgression was too great an affront against the leftoid hate machine. Thiel must suffer. Here’s hoping he has the fight in him to take on the beast so directly.
Gay Mulatto is a petty tyrant, the exact sort of petty tyrant liberals bemoan Trump will be once in office. And thecunt’s pettiness, should she achieve power, will make his seem tame by comparison.
It’s shitlib psychological projection all the way down. If you wonder whether we’ve yet hit bottom, there’s always a deeper pit to excavate as long as the sworn enemies of White civilization remain free to scheme and indulge their hatreds.





“I would also appreciate any comments from the Census Bureau that elucidate the “one-off” uniqueness of this rate?”
Don’t expect one. The Census Bureau has pulled a fast one here just before the election. A lot of the increase is due to the redesigned questioning for median income and they know it. Google search ‘2013 redesign census’ and follow the PDF links especially.
Or look at a previous blog post here:
http://blogs.census.gov/2015/09/15/comparison-guidance-income-and-poverty/
Their own studies show that the redesigned questions inflate median income figures, and they’ve mentioned in the fine print several places that comparisons for median income for now prior to 2013 should be made with caution, but they didn’t mention it when pitching these numbers to the press, and they didn’t exercise that caution on their own.
That’s why the note about the recent increase not being significantly different than 1997-1998 is there. It’s cover.