Cuckstablishment SuperCuck John Cucksich Performed His Duties As Instructed

Why is John “Cat Lady” Kasich — he who dribbles tepid platitudes like “migrants are made in the image of the Lord” and wants to hoard millions of them in the US as if they were stray cats — even in the GOP nomination race? He won’t win another state. Ohio was his hunchbacked cri de coeur. A 1-for-29 winning streak that can only get worse from here. Not to mention, the whole “aw shucks golly gee willikers” facade to dupe placid Midwesterners is just that; Cucksich is in reality a mean-spirited prick.

So what’s his angle? Obviously, he was employed as a GOPe suicide bomber. His job was to flush 66 delegates down the toilet so Trump couldn’t get them, increasing the hopes of the cuck traitors of a brokebacked convention that would cut Trump off from the nomination. Scum of the earth, these cucks, and how much clearer does it have to be shown to middle and working class Whites that their putative representatives in truth hate them with a passion and do nothing for them but make their lives worse?

Over on Twatter, Dick Brisket (@EmpireOfJeff) puts it well.

1. Consider: Kasich knows he has no shot at winning the nomination. So why would he stay in the race? It’s pretty simple, if depressing.

2. The GOPe has promised him some political plum in exchange for his help in keeping Trump from winning 1,237 delegates.

3. This is exactly the type of back-room dealing and betrayal of the voters’ wishes that got Rubio rejected so soundly.

4. It’s not that the GOP hasn’t learned. It’s that they hate you, resent even having to pay lip service to your demands, and now you’ll pay.

5. It may be suicidal for the party, but they don’t care. They will NOT share power with those they consider beneath them.

6. So what does that mean for the GOP? They’re finished. Expect at least 2 parties to emerge after this debacle. One Tea Partyish, one Estab.

7. Does this mean some time in the wilderness for conservatives? Of course it does. There was never any savior coming to fix our problems.

8. The country is now >50% Free Shitter. Hillary was president as soon as she announced her candidacy. That’s the America we live in.

Two thoughts. One, Hillary is not a shoe-in. Most Dems are secretly worried the most about Trump as a general election opponent. Trump has tremendous cross-over appeal that the GOP haven’t seen from their candidates since, oh, Reagan.

Two, Kasich was the Cucksters’ Last Stand. They don’t have any bullets left in the chamber. And I don’t think it will stumpening the Trumpening. At worst, the cuck show limps along all the way to the convention with Trump holding a comfortably large plurality of delegates, just shy of the 1,237 needed to lock the nom down. If the cucks’ menstrual flow hasn’t stopped by then, a GOPe split is a real possibility. I give it 40% chance at this point.

Either outcome — GOPe schism or GOPe acquiescence to Trump — means the end of the reign of “liberals are the real racists!” cucks. You could call it a Cuckularity. And it will be good.

Donald Trump’s Stone Cold Truths About Women

I’ll let you in on a leetle secret. It wasn’t Trump’s policy positions that initially roused my enthusiasm for his prospects as a cuckstablishment destroyer. Yes, the Wall and the rest of it certainly sealed the deal, but it was Trump’s charisma — his Game — that I noticed first and, based on my judgment then, would be the pure energy that carried him to victories innumerable. I have since been vindicated.

Trump’s Game is evident in the facility with which he handles friends and foes alike, but for astonishingly confirming evidence, one should look to the archives of Trump’s statements on female nature. The man clearly knows the score.

Shitlibs faint with the “I can’t even” vapors at the sight of Trump’s knowledge droppage, but we who operate in the dating trenches nod knowingly and recognize Trump as one of us: the few, the proud, the poonlords.

Here’s a selection of Trumpening Truths about women:

I would never buy Ivana any decent jewels or pictures. Why give her negotiable assets?

Trump gets that all’s fair in love and divorce.

Beauty and elegance, whether in a woman, a building, or a work of art, is not just superficial or something pretty to see.

Trump knows that Beauty is Truth, and Ugliness is Lies.

26,000 unreported sexual assaults in the military-only 238 convictions. What did these geniuses expect when they put men & women together?

Trump understands that men and women are different in mind as well as body.

It’s certainly not groundbreaking news that the early victories by the women on ‘The Apprentice’ were, to a very large extent, dependent on their sex appeal.

Pretty women can cash in their looks for fabulous prizes. And they do.

You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.

Self-evidently true.

There are basically three types of women and reactions. One is the good woman who very much loves her future husband, solely for himself, but refuses to sign the [prenup] agreement on principle. I fully understand this, but the man should take a pass anyway and find someone else. The other is the calculating woman who refuses to sign the prenuptial agreement because she is expecting to take advantage of the poor, unsuspecting sucker she’s got in her grasp. There is also the woman who will openly and quickly sign a prenuptial agreement in order to make a quick hit and take the money given to her.

Trump is familiar with the female archetypes. He is also familiar with the CH maxim “Always be ready to walk. It’s a man’s best defense against scheming broads”.

Women have one of the great acts of all time. The smart ones act very feminine and needy, but inside they are real killers. The person who came up with the expression ‘the weaker sex’ was either very naive or had to be kidding. I have seen women manipulate men with just a twitch of their eye — or perhaps another body part.

The greatest con feminism ever pulled was the idea that women are powerless pawns in the resource-acquisition market.

[Angelina Jolie’s] been with so many guys she makes me look like a baby… And, I just don’t even find her attractive.

Trump is a based slut shamer. He knows that cock-ravaged sluts have lowered their value as marriage material. #NoHymenNoDiamond

My favorite part [of ‘Pulp Fiction’] is when Sam has his gun out in the diner and he tells the guy to tell his girlfriend to shut up. Tell that bitch to be cool. Say: ‘Bitch be cool.’ I love those lines.

Trump is well aware of sexual dynamics, and that a real man is in charge of his woman. Beta males get steamrolled.

During one down period, I referred to him in print as a ‘financially embattled thousandaire’ and he sent me a copy of the column with my picture circled and ‘The Face of a Dog!’ written over it.

Fucking LOL. If the ugly shoe fits…

Women find [my] power almost as much of a turn-on as [my] money.

The stoniest, coldest truth. Chicks dig power. Men dig beauty. Trump is a student of the immutable cosmic laws governing the sexes.

All of the women on ‘The Apprentice’ flirted with me — consciously or unconsciously. That’s to be expected.

Trump assumes the sale. A sterling demonstration of a classic Game technique.

Bonus TrumpenTruth!

Women: “You have to treat ’em like shit.” (New York magazine, Nov. 9, 1992)

And here the Trumpening completes the circle with the Chateau. A maestro of the muff, Trump has internalized one of the Chateau’s timeless truths: Every girl loves a jerkboy fascist. They can’t help themselves. All the quisling, mewling betaboys can do is nip at the Asshole Alpha’s ankles, inflamed with envy as they go home at night to be reminded of their low sexual worth by the sight of their fat and dumpy wives (or gay lovers).

Donald Trump is the father and role model every young boy would be blessed to have, especially the little shitlib boys. May the Lord guide him and help him achieve the ultimate AMOG of America’s pissant cucks: the White House throne.

National Review’s Resident Cuckmug Kevin D. Williamson Pens Racist Screed

Check out these excerpts from Kevin D. Williamson’s latest National Review article. I can’t believe they give him a platform to print this racist trash!

National Review’s Kevin Williamson believes Hillary Clinton’s appeals to African-Americans are “immoral” because that demographic’s way of life deserves to die out. […]

Williamson, a long-time critic of The Harridan, essentially agrees that he doesn’t support any policies or rhetoric directly tailored to African-Americans — particularly about jobs being taken by outsourcing and immigration — because it would be wrong to do so.

“It is immoral because it perpetuates a lie: that the African-Americans that find themselves attracted to Clinton have been victimized by outside forces,” the NR roving correspondent writes. “[N]obody did this to them. They failed themselves.”

He then goes on to state that all the ills associated with downscale blacks are a result of that race’s inherent depravity.

“If you spend time in hardscrabble, black Detroit, or Ferguson, MO, or my own native Texas bathhouse, and you take an honest look at the welfare dependency, the drug and alcohol addiction, the family anarchy—which is to say, the whelping of human children with all the respect and wisdom of a stray dog—you will come to an awful realization. It wasn’t Beijing. It wasn’t even Washington, as bad as Washington can be. It wasn’t immigrants from Mexico, excessive and problematic as our current immigration levels are. It wasn’t any of that,” Williamson states.

He then goes on to make the conclusion that it’s great these communities are dying out because they have a warped morality and are a dead weight on the economy.

“The truth about these dysfunctional, downscale black communities is that they deserve to die. Economically, they are negative assets. Morally, they are indefensible,” the conservative writer says. “The African-American under-class is in thrall to a vicious, selfish culture whose main products are misery and murder. Hillary Clinton’s speeches make them feel good. So does crack cocaine. What they need isn’t analgesics, literal or political. They need real opportunity, which means that they need real change, which means that they need U-Haul. If you want to live, get out of Atlanta [a heavily-black town in Georgia].”

If you haven’t figured it out yet, Williamson’s racist screed was actually aimed at Whites. Just substitute “whites” and “white working class” everywhere you read “blacks” and “African-Americans”. The racism against Whites gets published; the version of it with “blacks” replacing “whites” would get Williamson fired from National Cucktacular and his penis-shaped head on millions of network broadcasts as the featured “two minutes hate” antiracism whipping cur (which he’d probably enjoy).

Prying into Williamson’s GRidS, I can think of at least three motivations for this latest Williamson article revealing his hatred of BadWhites who don’t genuflect before the MLK monument or rave about the unconventional conservatism of piss porn.

1. The article is an elaborately insincere troll of the foes he really hates: the “White identity” alt-right. In this reading, Williamson appears to be sarcastically mocking an assumed hypocrisy among White identitarians to support the White working class against elite machinations while simultaneously blaming blacks’ miseries on their race’s inherent deficiencies. The premise is flawed, though, because it relies for its ideological grounding, like all cuck declarations do, on the religion of race creationism (i.e., the belief that evolution stopped at the neck up and the skin down and that therefore all races are equal in every way except on the most superficial traits). The alt-right recognizes intra-race as well as inter-race differences in aptitude and character, and understands that this fundamental view is not incompatible with the indictment that the ruling class and their lackeys push policies that bring unnecessary hardship to the non-ACELA classes. This worldview is a far more consistent stance than anything the cuck-right has attempted to elucidate.
2. Williamson is psychologically projecting his hatred of black dysfunction onto Whites. He’s too cowardly to come out and say “blacks are violent and allergic to civilized norms of behavior” so he sublimates his hatred into a rage against the White working classes who, for all their faults, are nowhere near the level of dysfunction that your typical majority-black ghetto exhibits.
3. Williamson is a gay homosexual who was rejected by his redneck Texan father, and his slanders against the White working class are essentially an elaborate F YOU DAD act of negative transference.

Whatever Williamson’s psychological peculiarities, his stated and implied reasons for hating working class Whites are utterly bankrupt. Non-elite White men aren’t coddled like blacks and hispanics and women. There is no affirmative action for non-elite White men. No government contract set-asides. No 24/7 mass media engine to blame all their woes on nonWhite racism and celebrate their White working class cultural contributions to America. No White Lives Matter or Black Privilege movements to shore up their egos and make them feel like under-appreciated valued members to society. No education industrial complex to glorify their history (or make it up if insufficiently glorious) and to simultaneously diminish the history of nonWhites.

But Keven D. Williamson knows all this. He’s just doesn’t care. Which makes him a dirtbag. Nothing more.

He’d better hope that when his dreamed-of Diversitopia in America is fully realized, that the numerically overwhelming nonWhite races, whom I guarantee won’t share his ACELA Whites’ pathologically cucked impulse to leapfrog moral loyalties to outsider races, keep him around as the funny-looking court faggot instead of feeding him alive to a pit of crocodiles like they do to Boer farmers.

The Leftoid Phenotype

These two Trump haters are representative of so many of their kind.

A masculine woman and a feminine man. The sexual polarities reversed, flipping a giant upside-down middle finger to the divine order. Mangrrls and girlbois are the classic leftoid phenotype. They carry the baggage of their scarred psyches on their punchable faces. A sick people steering a sick society to a sick bed.

Spot The F*ck Me Stare

While you’re at it, see if you can spot the “I’m a witchy cunt” stare, too.

The Great Men On The Welfare State

Bertrand Russell is a patron sadist of Chateau Heartiste for good reason; when he’s on, he’s quite good at cataloguing the ills that befall those cultures which turn their backs to the gods of the copybook headings. Here he is on the welfare state and its corruption of the sexual market:

If you got a chill reading this, that’s normal. You see how prophetic Russell was — the rise of single momhood, the destruction wrought by the divorce industrial complex, the encroachment of leftoid authoritarianism, the disavowal of kin and country — and you fear what is to come next.

All The Single Ladies Are Pushing America Over The Leftist Cliff

Single momhood is up. The marriage rate is down. The age of first marriage is up. And the divorce industrial complex provides incentives to women to shatter marriages that would have survived similar rough patches not too long ago.

What does this distressed state of frayed affairs portend for America? How about a rapid and continual shift in the electorate toward Leftism and all its attendant social ills.

Why have women become Left-Wing? The political gender gap and the decline in marriage.

The last three decades have witnessed the rise of a political gender gap in the United States wherein more women than men favor the Democratic party. We trace this development to the decline in marriage, which we posit has made men richer and women poorer. [ed: this is not necessarily true. controlled analysis of actual living standards post-divorce support a less financially stable position for men. and the *perception* of financial gain matters; women perceive, due to legal incentives, that they will gain more in a divorce.] Data for the United States support this argument. First, there is a strong positive correlation between state divorce prevalence and the political gender gap—higher divorce prevalence reduces support for the Democrats among men but not women. Second, longitudinal data show that following marriage (divorce), women are less (more) likely to support the Democratic party.

Divorced men don’t stop voting Democrat because they are in a better financial position than they were in marriage; rather, they stop voting Democrat because the Democrat Party supports the whole panoply of anti-male feminist policy preferences that tilt the divorce playing field against men’s interests. Burn a divorced man once, shame on him. Burn him twice….

The real reason single women — pre-marriage and post-divorce — more strongly support the Shitlib Party is because they are biologically compelled to seek a male provider and his resources when they are mate-less. If no dependable or asset-rich man is available, then single and divorced women, and especially single moms with future juvenile delinquent and roadside stripper mouths to feed, will seek resources from the best available alternative: Big Daddy Government.

Consequently, as the nation loads up with more sex and the city mimosaettes and platitude-quaffing obese single moms of mystery meats, the bigger government will grow to satisfy the demand for more free first date dinners of dem welfare programs. And that is how the culture substrate changes absent any widespread genetic changes in the population, (which will follow not long after a massive and prolonged culture change).

Moral of the SCIENCE!: Female suffrage was a big mistake.