president Three Snaps And A Butt Slap

It’s only a split-second long, but about halfway through this video of president Three Snaps taking a selfie he reveals what has got to be the GAYEST looking expression possible from a putatively heterosexual man.

The coy half-smile and chin dip need a sassy hand on the hip to complete the picture and send Three Snaps into DEFFAG 1 territory.

In one hundred years, Americans will either look back on this period as shockingly callow and degenerate, or America will have been long gone and thus left with no non-pozzed Americans to look back with clear eyes on anything.

The Show

Commenter quixotic, in the middle of a field report about meeting a girl in a phone store, mentioned an interesting aspect of pickup that another reader, Putin, refers to as “the show”.

The weirdest part was feeling every man and women in the store watching me or trying to listen to us. They could see that smirk on me, the way she constantly giggled and flipped her hair, the way she got a little nervous at times, her female co-worker and her did that thing where girls look at each other for a second to say “are you seeing this?” “yes!” when they thought I wasn’t looking and it all went like fucking clockwork. Thank you for all you have taught me CH.

This is an under-appreciated facet of public flirting that a few men feed on, but most men find daunting. Approach anxiety isn’t just fear of how a woman will react to being hit on; it’s also fear of how onlookers will react. Will they laugh? Point and whisper among themselves? The thought of a public shaming can drive many a man to eject from potential love scenarios that he otherwise would have followed through on if the only participants were himself and the girl.

Quixotic sounds like the type of man who is energized by The Show. Many extroverts, naturals, politicians, and salesmen are like this. The approval of the crowd/coworkers motivates almost as much as the approval of the woman/customer who inspires the lustful/avaricious approach.

These men are in the minority. Most (White) men are introverts, who shudder thinking about all the ways The Show can go wrong for them. A select few truly relish the Klieg lights. Most would rather perform their seduction art in a secluded location, away from the heat of audience expectation.

My advice to introverts trying to hurdle the mental stumbling block of The Show on the way to a public romantic flirtation is to continually remind themselves that people are watching not out of judgment, but envy. Envy that they don’t have the balls to do what you’re doing. Think that, and you’ll feel your…heart… stiffen for battle. Even if the pickup goes south, you’ll have the pride of knowing you busted a move while The Show watched immobile from the sidelines.

Comment Of The Week: Be The Man Women Desire And Men Admire

COTW winner is “anonymous”, revealing why it’s important that an alt-right leader of men also be a leader of ladies. (Trump being the most obvious exemplar.)

as a mid twentys young man who could be considered a lower alpha sigma-ish type, iv had great success converting many friends to Alt right thinking just by being that sorta cool guy who goes against the grain of the mainstream thinking whilst being a known ‘player’

men are always looking to emulate other men who get lots of girls. if you are one of these men, they will listen to what you have to say and will emulate your edginess. one thing that all of us at CH are doing is learning to become this pussy magnet unpolitically correct shitlord that will natural attract men (and womens of course) interest.

Bolded for impact. This is a powerful observation that often eludes the more naive pundits of the tradcon- and alt-right. So much anger on the Right is wasted attacking “manosphere misogynists” when they could redirect that rage to deserving targets if they only understood this basic biomechanical truth about the sexes:

Men respect a man whom women desire.

A loser with women will not attract much of a following – not for long, anyhow – because he fails at the most fundamental indicator of male success. And what self-respecting man would follow an existential failure into battle?

Another Bullshit Study Published By A Feminist “””Academic””” Is Debunked

Recall the CH axiom about any social “””science””” coming out of a feminism-drenched university: If there’s a women’s studies department, the good bet is that the social science department is similarly corrupted, and any feminist-friendly findings are likely to be tainted and worthless. Leftist saturation of academia has become so bad that social expectation bias and self-serving bogus science rubber-stamping the equalist narrative are more the norm than the exception.

On that premise, here’s Greg Cochran sticking the shiv in the hide of yet another crappy feminist study that defies credulity.

I just noticed an new article in PNAS – research by Daphna Joel a behavioral neuroscientist at Tel Aviv University. Using MRI, she concludes that the brains of men and women aren’t really different. She suggests that the notion that men and women behave differently may be a myth.

She is, of course, utterly full of shit. It’s fountaining out of every pore: her hair will never go gray. We know of many sex differences in the brain – not just volume, not just the fraction of gray matter vs white matter, not just big differences in the incidences of neuropsychiatric disorders like autism and anorexia nervosa. In a few cases (like CAH, or androgen sensitivity, or maybe Turner’s syndrome) we know something about the developmental mechanisms involved. We see analogous differences in animal models: and no, it’s not culture. […]

…similarity in gross anatomy does not ensure similar behavioral tendencies. If I compared the brain of a pit bull with that of a similar-sized border collie, I doubt if I could see the behavioral differences in the size of the amygdala or whatever. Those behavioral differences exist, they’re innate, they have a physical/genetic basis – but at the moment I couldn’t tell you what brain differences to look for. Could be differences in the distribution of neurotransmitter receptors, or differences in axon length, or dendrite connectivity – lots of things, including many that wouldn’t show up on MRI.

Anyone who’s lived a day in his life can’t help but notice men and women are on average different in some powerfully fundamental ways. Desire, sexual proclivity, communication, hobbies, occupational preferences, bathroom habits… the list of REAL WORLD sex differences goes on for miles.

Yet we are supposed to believe a raging lunatic feminist burnishing a conveniently pro-equalist study while steeped in the toxins of a feminist milieu? Yeah, no.

Are Male Promiscuity And Female Chastity Compatible?

From a long thread at MPC about the “red pill”, the assertion in this post raised an eyebrow:

One of the major problems with the Manosphere (that betrays the fact that it’s really just a vehicle for misogynists to try and get laid)

What did I tell you about tradcons sounding just like feminists in their shared compulsion to pathologize male sexuality? So now men with a working libido are “misogynist” according to the tradcon worldview.

is that they demonize female promiscuity while glorifying male promiscuity.

I don’t read red pill sites (except on rare occasions when readers send a link to one they regard as worthy of my attention). Speaking on behalf of the Chateau lordship, there is no “demonization” of female sexuality here. The telling of ugly truths about female nature is not the same as railing against female sexual nature and hoping it goes away or can be turned into something more benign to an equalist view of the sexes. (A glib “is, not ought” should suffice here.)

Now, it is true that, in a vacuum, female promiscuity is far worse than male promiscuity.

“In a vacuum”. How sophistic. Since when has the sexual market ever operated “in a vacuum”? Never. And yet, for reasons explained here ad nauseam (although apparently not nauseam enough), female promiscuity is more corrosive than male promiscuity to relationship and family stability and, scaled up, to societal stability. Yes, sluts really are more dangerous to social health than are cads.

However, male promiscuity REQUIRES either female promiscuity or homosexuality in order to occur.

This is the assertion that roused an eyebrow. (Ignore the homo slur, which is typical MPCspeak when faced with the task of explaining vigorous and unapologetic male heterosexuality.) Superficially, it sounds credible. After all, it takes two to tango. More cads must necessarily mean more sluts to complete the pairings.

Except, it doesn’t work that way. Betraying a deep ignorance (or willful dissembling) about the nature of the sexual market and the psychosexual differences between the sexes, this MPC poaster fails to grasp the reality of female hypergamy and male desire for variety, and how those intrinsic dispositions can affect the arithmetic of romantic pairings.

The top 20% of women strongly prefer to be with the top 10% of men. The top 10% of men will spread their seed among the top 30% of women (and often more widely than that), only strongly preferring the top 10% of women when they are serious about commitment and settling down.

The hypergamy-polygyny nexus results in a shaky equilibrium where a small percentage of cads are having sex with a larger percentage of women. But these cads jump from woman to woman, or they keep multiple women as sexual outlets in a de facto harem, meeting up with each one on an irregular basis, (hence the common complaint among woman dating jerkboys that the jerks they love are never around).

What this means in practice is that one promiscuous man will date ten less promiscuous women, since each of his lovers is likely to be with only him and not sharing him with other men in a multiple concurrent sexual relationship arrangement. (Women are more averse than men are to fucking multiple lovers concurrently.)

Conclusion: yes, male promiscuity can coexist with female chastity. Or a reasonable 2016 facsimile of female chastity.

Up to a point.

Eventually, if there are enough cads (cf., Africa) then sluts will have to increase in number to keep up with the changing ratio of fevered flings to lukewarm LTRs. A society in which 90% of men were promiscuous cads would require a boost in the numbers of promiscuous sluts to bring balance to the sexual force. Or one VERY slutty woman to service all those men.

Is This The Archetypal Alpha Male Body Language?

A reader offers this photo of the Lion Trump as evidence of perfect alpha male body language.

Everything from the posture, to the stride, to the body language, to the insouciant look on his face screams alpha and oozes charisma.  These fledgling beta male gamer types could learn volumes from this photo alone.  Jeb too.  But he’s a lost cause.

Jeb is useful as a lesson in what not to do. He’ll never let us down on that job.

As for Trump’s victory stride… yes, I’d have to agree that is about the most alpha male pose a man could strike. The open torso and Christ-like welcoming hands ready to embrace believers are the foundation that support the entire alpha edifice. Open body language is alpha because it makes one vulnerable to attack, which implies that the man intentionally opening his body is confident no one will dare attack him, or if he is attacked he will fend it off easily.

Women (and men) perceive this gregarious posture as the look of an alpha male, because it triggers ancient stirrings in the primal cores of our brains. We are a divinely inspired species, but the animal instinct is always there, lurking, to remind us of our earthly shackles.

FYI, open facial expressions evoke the opposite perception in people. Wide eyes, raised eyebrows and open mouth communicate beta maleness. Combining a closed facial expression with an open body language is the recipe for influencing people’s perceptions of you as the arch-alpha.

The Effete Elite Vs The Trumpening

The Effete Elite are aghast that Trump used (by proxy) the word “pussy” to insult TheCruzRuse. Meanwhile, Trump just won over every Reagan Democrat.

This is something the hermetically sealed, culturally isolated, demographically gated bubble boys of the beltways don’t get about Trump. These effete fags who don’t even lift clutch their pearls when Trump channels the spirit of his blood and soil White Warriors and speaks in the MASCULINE language of the Tribe Realtalk. Anything remotely masculine frightens shitlibs, you see, because masculinity, unlike femininity, is more closely associated with truth-telling. And masculine men remind your typical shitlib of his years spent in middle school with his underwear waistband hiked up to his nipples.

I love it. Trump is smart, charismatic, and in touch with the vast army of non-insider Whites who are FED UP with anti-White virtue signaling and the gayfagfruitcup feminization of White leftoids who, for now, control the media vertical and horizontal. The more pussy bombs the Don drops, the higher his polls go, and the squeakier Kevin Williamson’s cucksnark gets.

Would you rather have a vulgar President or a mincing, prissy, passive-aggressive, White-hating, mulatto fuccboi president? Rhetorical.