Mainstream Media Websites Paying Homage To Chateau Heartiste’s World-Changing Influence

Permit a moment to *preen*.

– At Breitbart, Milo Yiannopoulos links to an older CH post about sexbots. (Hey, Milo, there’s been a lot of great CH stuff since then that you can leverage for 3,000+ comment gain.) The article is a good read, even if the points made are already familiar to Chateau acolytes. The huge response to it is proof that the topic hits a lot of nerves, and only a shiv tip-dipped in truth frog poison will induce that kind of excruciating nerve inflammation reaction.

– Nick Gillespie at Reason magazine (libertarioid central) swipes right on the Chateau as he accepts the truth of an important game concept: Donald Trump negs his rivals. Like many beta males who attempt to understand game without field experience, Nick doesn’t quite get the neg, but he comes closer than most awestruck outsiders. The neg isn’t “an insult, followed by a compliment”; it’s a backhanded compliment. The insult — and that’s really too strong a wrong to describe the effect, which would be better described as “a tease” — is implied in the structure of the compliment; it isn’t launched like a verbal ICBM. Also, another correction: The neg works on ALL people, but especially women, because it is human nature to seek social approval and acceptance from others we deem superior (or, in the case of women, dominant and charming) to us.

– Although it’s a stretch to call it a “mainstream” site, Free Republic grapples with the game principle of alpha male body language, and how Donald “Can’t Stump The” Trump uses it to his advantage. CH has numerous archived posts on this topic predating the current political pundit fascination with it by years.

– If When Trump wins the Presidency, remember that CH endorsed his candidacy three months ago to this day, on June 17, beating Lion of the Blogosphere’s endorsement by one month. Heh.

***

While these next two tributes to CH’s insidious greatness didn’t directly link to yer ‘umble narrator, they did tacitly pay respect to the Chateau’s Stone Cold Shivthink and provide evidence that CH has widened the Overton Window so much it is prolapsed and leaking off-message memetic viruses.

– Ann Coulter has raised her Game and has earned enough financial independence to enjoy a refreshing sip of freethought independence. We here at CH believe Ann is a secret reader and our je ne sais quoi has rubbed off on her and amplified her preexisting condition to assault people with uncomfortable truths.

– No need for conjecture. Steve Sailer is definitely a CH reader (but only at night, in a gloomily underlit bedroom). He indirectly endorses the CH take on the “””refugee””” “””crisis””” as a case of the German betaboys getting cucked by their leader, the aging broad Merkel, who can’t help but feel long-dormant vagina tingles erupting for invading swarth of the earth armed with acting class, camera-ready sob stories to put over on gullible leftoid equalist Hiveminders.

***

Update: Anatoly Karlin at Unz is also a reader. The Chateau needs a guesthouse.

America, Then And Now

Then:

Now:

A Cynic’s View Of Relationship Sex

There’s a sizable contingent of “red pillers” who believe that the male urge to have sex with a variety of women is, if you take their consternation at face value, unnatural. I never did get this line of attack against the degenerate poz. While I can’t fault the intention, the premise is based on a lie that feeds directly into feminist myth-making about the psychological sameness of the sexes.

This belief, and resulting admonition, that men are naturally monogamous and only desire poosy varietals when there’s something wrong with their mental state is not just wrong, it’s malignant, and will paradoxically cause a lot of men trouble within the confines of their monogamous relationships!

Reader superslaviswife echoes this CH sentiment and explains how the “cads are sickos” theory of the sexual market actually harms men’s ability to create and sustain monogamous relationships.

Something I do wonder about is the staleness of “the regular”. Many Beta males, as far as I have heard, are happy enough to get regular sex or sexual access, to see a naked woman daily, that the actual frequency, variety and duration of sexual sessions doesn’t matter to them. Here we get two problems:

1: Women need to see men as sexual beings constantly on the ready and on the prowl. You can’t be non-sexual 99% of the time and expect a woman to be aroused the remaining 1%. Even women with high sex drives who frequently initiate expect their man to reciprocate sexual cues, to signal he’s ready and warmed up. If we’re constantly slowly simmering, it takes a lot less to hit boiling point. This is why fostering affection doesn’t result in sex. At best it’s neutral. At worst it distracts us from being sexual. This is also why game is all about building tension: if you aren’t constantly sexual, the pot stops boiling and you could be anywhere from warm to needing to start over.

Women married to men with high libidos have to know that these men are also more likely to pursue additional outlets for their libidos.

2: If a man rejects sex from a woman too often, is rarely ready, wants sex once or twice a week because his T is too low and always wants a quick couple of minutes in the same position, ie, if he wants “just the regular please”, I can’t see how anyone would cope. From time to time, the regular will be needed. Maybe there isn’t much time, the other rooms aren’t available, you’re in a rough patch or a dry spell due to stress and just need to get the ball rolling again… But even then, when you know what’s going to happen you may as well open a book, to be honest. And if that’s your entire sex life, where’s the enjoyment? It’s reducing it to just a biological function, like buying macdonald’s instead of making a steak burger dinner.

This is a cynic’s view of relationship sex and durability, which means it has more truth value than the happy-clappy romantic view of sex.

Maxim #40: Men are strictly monogamous only insofar as their options for sexual variety are limited.

There are, of course, individual and race-based differences in the predilection for men to pursue multiple sex partners (concurrent or consecutive). But the general rule stands: Men, more than women, have strong NATURAL sexual urges to FUCK every pretty young woman they lay eyes upon. And men with OPTIONS will, often enough to put the lie to the “cads are sickos” theory, fulfill their non-monogamous desires.

The problem of stale relationship sex is intrinsic to differences in sexual desire between men and women. Over time, (usually about two years), a man will lose that groinal fire for his girlfriend or wife. This is inevitable, and coupled with the tendency of women to pack on the pounds and the nagger attitude after they have extracted commitment from a man, it should surprise no Realthinker that bed death isn’t solely a morbidly obese lesbian phenomenon.

The staleness of regular sex is compounded by further insults to relationship stability that are less physiological in nature than psychological. One, women, due to their hypergamous compulsions, will gradually lose attraction for their loyal and dependable male partners, unless those men initiate countermeasures to combat their women’s emotional and vaginal atomization. (Read “countermeasure”: GAME). It is a fact of LTRs and marriage that both men and women get complacent, which means men get BETA and SOFT and women get FAT and NAGGARDLY.

Two, if the character of the men that women are currently choosing to form long-term commitments is changing toward a SOFTER, EFFEMINATE, BETA NORM, than we will see more complaints from those women about their men’s ability to SATISFY them. And in fact I do think the character of Western men is changing to one that is less masculine and more supplicating.

My answer to this problem of stale “regular sex” is that men should not be penalized or admonished for desiring sex with many women (and sometimes fulfilling their desire), just as women are not and never have been penalized nor admonished for hypergamously desiring the best man they can get and for pushing him sooner rather than later into promises of lifelong commitment. This is a double standard — or if you prefer, a different standard — that is necessary to accommodate the differing psychologies and darwinian imperatives of men and women.

If a man is happy to be in a monogamous relationship for life with the woman he loves, then the anti-cad “red pillers” ought to get on board with the CH recommendation that these men would benefit themselves AND their women if they learned game aka the art and science of applied charisma, as a method of reinvigorating flagging relationships. But I doubt these particular anti-cad red piller types will ever see the light, because many of them nurse intense envy of men who bed desirable women and make no apology for it.

Alpha Islam, Beta Christianity

Paging Matt King…

I was all set to write a lengthy exegesis on this topic, when a reader helpfully slapped together a visual meme that says more, and says it better, than any blog essay could.

Shiv shivvily shiv shivvily shiv shiv shivoo…. boy I’ve got a juxtaposition for you. On the left, the alpha male Muslim refugee stealing the bag of goodies from the beta male Germanboy just trying to help. On the right, the White European beta male looking defeated as the interloper alpha male Muslim takes a selfie with the White European Angela Merkel who can’t help but feel vagina tingles* (however dusty) for this impudent swarth of the earth.

In the end, the hamster wins. The Ottoman hordes and Donald Trump have this in common: every girl loves a cocky sonofabitch. And that is why Western women are NEXTing their glorious heritage. They can sense that their native men don’t have that fighting spirit anymore.

*this is why women should never be leaders of nations. they don’t have that steel-reinforced backbone to refrain from bending over and rolling out the red carpet for the world’s theatre acting-class poors. men preserve their culture’s commons; women trash it when a stronger tribe marches into the town square.

The Punchable Shitlib Couple

Reader peterike says there’s comedy gold buried in the New York Beta Times wedding announcements.

I tell ya, if you ever want a collection of punchable Libshit faces, NYTimesvows is the place to go (not a parody account; they all link back to NY Times wedding articles).

What a depressing feed. Gays and lesbians all over. Stupid lib faces. Lots and lots of mixed race couples. Plenty of Asian couples (why are you in my country?). Here and there you see some strong looking white couples.

I really loved this charming couple. She has a masters in Islamic studies, he’s an artistic director at a theater. They both look totally out of their minds.

I’ll say it again: physiognomy needs to make a big comeback. Dude looks like a lesbian, and the female shitlib’s crazy eyes and fake plasticine smile indicate she’s one depressive episode away from running off to join an ISIS harem.

SWPL shitlibs, they really are a type! If it weren’t for their dismal fertility rate and low T effeminate men, they could be well on their way to becoming their own race. Thankfully for the rest of us, they’re a dying breed.

Comment Of The Week: The Microjizzome

COTW winner Artisanal Toad titillates with a suggestive theory for why men prefer virgins and why cock carousel riders are bad bets for long-term commitment.

I suggest that CH spend some time investigating the complexities of the microbiome with respect to the [Alpha Fux/Beta Bux] model.

The act of “becoming one flesh” is usually relegated to the sidelines as a spiritual concept but in reality its a simple biological fact that everyone has a specific microbiome profile. Everyone has about ten trillion cells that make up their bodies, but there are about one hundred trillion cells living in that same body that are microbes. The human genome has about twenty-one thousand genes, but the microbes living in the body have around eight million genes that interact with the body, turn genes on and off, tinker with the immune system and stuff like that. The microbes in the body are part of who the person is.

When a woman spreads her legs for a guy she isn’t just getting his semen, she’s getting a big dose of his microbiome and as time passes they literally become one flesh as their microbiome profiles merge. The microbiome affects who you are, how you think and how you feel. It has a huge impact on things like digestion, allergies, diabetes, obesity, bowel disorders and even psychiatric stuff like schizophrenia and depression. Researchers are just getting started looking at this stuff.

(Not to put to sharp a point on it… but there’s a good scientific reason for not sticking your dick in crazy… because it rubs off and becomes part of you. It works the other way too. The sluts who hook up with the bad boys are getting a dose of their microbiome profile… absorbing crazy one microbe at a time. The dark tryads, the psychopaths, the aspy-alphas, all of them. We don’t even know the questions to ask in terms of to what degree the microbiome profile affects psychopathy, sociopathy and the cluster-B problems, but there’s plenty of evidence to suggest something is there.)

One aspect of alpha fux is when several women are sharing the same guy, there is a shared exchange of the microbiome with each other as well as him and over time they all develop a similar profile. So, if he’s sticking his dick in crazy he’s going to be transmitting crazy to every woman he screws after that. Think about it. Why are more and more women so screwed up? Maybe there’s more here than meets the eye.

The microbiome has an impact on emotions and the way you think about things. It goes even further, though, when we consider single mothers. When a woman gets pregnant, fetal cells will invade her body. These are almost always stem cells and they’ll go to any part of her body that needs help and set to work repairing it. But, fetal cells are half her DNA and half his DNA. That means the father of that baby will literally become a part of her with every baby she has because those cells don’t go away. His DNA will be with her for the rest of her life along with his microbiome.

Do you really want a woman like that? Again, science hasn’t even begun to investigate the extent of what is happening here.

Doctors used to think that semen was just the delivery vehicle for the sperm, but now they know better. Semen is now considered the most complex fluid the body produces, more complex than blood. It’s loaded with enzymes and prostaglandins that female bodies don’t produce. The vagina, cervix and uterus will absorb it. This is one reason why women are biologically attracted to being raw-dogged, because to use condoms is to rob them of things they need. Literally.

The woman about to hit the wall that’s a former carousel rider looking to change lanes has polluted herself in a very microbial way as much as she can and a man that settles for something like that is taking on a case of “damaged goods” in ways that science is only just now beginning to investigate.

This sounds similar to Greg Cochrane’s theory that a lot of unusual human behaviors, like homosexuality, may be caused by pathogens.

So if we accept the “microjizzome” theory at face value, we have to accept that our wise forebears had it right about young virginal women: virgins are a prize worth pursuing. And the value of virgins is nearly universally high across the globe.

I don’t necessarily buy this theory. It carries a whiff of epigenetics, which is a favored, and mostly overblown, opposing theory held by a lot of blank slatists against the gene-dominant view of causes of human behavior. But, it does have some theoretical and observational evidence for it, so it’s worth investigating to see if there’s something there.

***

COTW runner-up is “just passing through”, who remarks on the Charlotte Proudman story making the alt-mockery rounds.

CH’s wisdom must have finally got through to my thick head. As soon as I read tho story this morning I posted this comment in the Telegraph…

GENDER TRUTH 101

Any man with the slightest knowledge of how attraction works in the female psyche, knows that this woman wasn’t really upset with this Man’s indication of interest in her, but because he weakly, hedged his bets by qualifying that interest with the precursor…”I know this isn’t PC but”. And in so doing, sub-communicated his fear. And a frightened Man, is da facto, weak. And there is nothing that turns women off of a man quicker than weakness. In fact, a frightened Man is to a woman, what a drowning person is to another drowning person… At best useless at worse dangerous.

So here’s a diamond bullet of wisdom, mark it well:

A WOMAN WILL FORGIVE A MAN ANYTHING ECCEPT WEAKNESS!

But just as “Male Weakness” is cryptonite to a woman’s attraction triggers, “Male Boldness” is pure cat nip. So be bold men. Be bold.

Oh, and never ever ever apologise. Ever! Women take apologies as just another sign of weakness. By all means apologise to your male friends but never to a woman. It won’t help. If you get cornered, do a Clinton…. ” mistakes have been made” speech. But don’t apologise. Ever!

100% truefact. Women are repulsed by weak men like men are repulsed by fat and ugly women.

What The Germans Are Allowing Into Their Homeland

This is too funny, and made funnier by the fact that it was totally preventable. A do-gooder, bleeding heart, pathologically altruistic, status whoring German SWPL liberal came to help Syrian migrants and for his generosity was rewarded by a pawing, grasping mob of thieves robbing him of his bag of treats.

German tries to donate food but bag gets stolen

Looks like Germany is about to get more of that enriching, strengthening Diversity™, good and hard!

PS The German responds with the international sign of shitlib prostration to his token vibrants refusing to follow the script: Hands up in exasperated surrender.