Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Chateau Heartiste is proud to host, with our co-sponsor NPR, an interview with famed sex therapist, Dr. Root. Full audio of the interview can be found here.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Thanks for joining us. I’m Caitlynnneee Jenner. Dr. Root collects turtles. He says it’s because they stick their necks out a lot the way his erection grows. It’s an attitude that’s worked well for him. Dr. Root joins us from the opium den of Chateau Heartiste in [REDACTED].

Dr. Root:

Next time you’re in New York, I want to have coffee with you.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Are you hitting on me, Dr. Root?

Dr. Root:

Yes, but only to get closer to your slutty coalburner step-daughters.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Oh haha… you! Dr. Root. His brand new book is titled “The Doctor Is In: Dr. Root On Love, Life, And Squirting Orgasms.” I want to know how you got to the United States and then went to work for Planned Parenthood.

Dr. Root:

I used to hit on girls in the Planned Parenthood waiting room.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Really! Why would you do such a thing?

Dr. Root:

Because vulnerable girls are more open sexually. Open to my sexual healing. It’s like unmarried bridesmaids at weddings and the grief-stricken at funerals. You’ve got to get them while they’re in a terrible emotional state, ready for anyone to come take their minds off the bad feels.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Let’s get to our listener questions. Here is an email for you, Dr. Root. And this could literally take hours to answer. She says, “How do you keep love alive?”

Dr. Root:

Don’t get fat.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Excuse me?

Dr. Root:

Yes, don’t get fat. And give your man plenty of blowjobs. That is the best way to keep his love alive. Just don’t expect much after two years or so, because men have a natural instinct to love many women.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Ooookayyy… We have an email here — no, a posting on Facebook — you see how things are changing — says, “Does it bother Dr. Root that there is so much hyper-sexualized dialog and innuendo on prime time television?”

Dr. Root:

The gay propaganda is over the top. And by that I don’t mean two gays kissing. I mean, two gays having a normal, healthy, monogamous relationship without weekly trips to the glory hole, followed by visits to the clinic for suturing anal fissures. When does that happen in real life?

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Oh my my. Isn’t that homophobic?

Dr. Root:

Nocturnal emissions.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Come again?

Dr. Root:

Exactly. By the way, isn’t it funny when I say nocturnal emissions with my accent? I’ll tell you something else, Bruce… er, Caitlynnneee… if we have time.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Surely.

Dr. Root:

I am very worried about college campuses saying that a woman and a man or two men or two women, but I talk right now about woman and man, can be in bed together, Caity, and at one time, naked, and at one time, he or she — most of the time they think she can say, I changed my mind. No such thing is possible. In the Talmud, in the Jewish tradition, it says when that part of the male anatomy is aroused, when there is an erection, the brain flies out of the head. And we have to take that very seriously.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Are you?…. are you suggesting… that women take personal responsibility for their actions? Dr. Root, that is beyond the pale.

Dr. Root:

But within the Pale of Settlement!

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Ok, moving on from college campuses, here’s a question about, perhaps, somewhat younger children from Lindsey Gayham in San Francisco, CA. Lindsey, you’re on the air.

Lindsey Gayham:

Hi. I saw Dr. Root years and years ago on a talk show and he said something I’ve never forgotten. I believe someone on the show had a question about a child sort of bouncing on one’s knee and becoming perhaps a bit too excited, but Dr. Root said the comment that we have to make genitals feel good. And in listening to his earlier comments, I’m thinking, I would like to ask him, do you ever see a day in which children will be more openly recognized as sexual human beings from birth? And what can we, as a society, do to sort of enable them or give them their own sexual rights or emancipation in a positive way?

{editorial break: I swear I am not making this up}

Dr. Root:

I want to tell you something. I’m old fashioned and a square. Children can feel sexual, there’s no question. Boys can have erections as babies, when they’re touched or when their diapers are being changed. Girls, when they’re touched, their clitoris can be aroused. Of course, it’s an autonomic response, devoid of anything resembling adult desire, so I’m afraid pedophiles like yourself will have a hard time rationalizing your urges to grope small children, but I suppose you can try. It’s 2015, anything is possible! Like gay marriage!

Dr. Root:

And it’s a good question, but I am, all of these years, have been rather old fashioned and a square. I tell parents careful not to walk around naked with buttplugs up your ass when there are teenagers in your home. Because the father, especially a biologically unrelated stepfather that the children’s whore slut single mom roped into a second marriage, could feel some kind of erector, some kind of feeling, and get a bottle of lube. How come he gets aroused when he sees his stepdaughter naked? Is it her pert tits, her firm round ass, her luscious lips and smooth skin? I’m not saying when somebody walks in, somebody takes a shower to make a big to do. But I believe in our culture, to make it separate and to be very careful, because that sexual drive, the sexual desire is a strong one. Leave the open air boobies hanging out to those tribes in National Geographic.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Dr. Root, I want to go back to what you were talking about before the break. That is, young people on college campuses and the concern about at what moment, being in an aroused situation, and then hearing the young woman saying no. What you’re saying is it’s already gone too far.

Dr. Root:

Women have their own language for arousal. Yes means yes. no means maybe, and maybe means yes, but after a few empty promises first. If a woman gets so drunk she can’t consent, she should think about not drinking so much if she wants to avoid morning-after regret. And don’t forget, Caitlynnneee, a drunk man can’t know if she’s given him her consent. So really, we should get the long arm of the law out of the bedrooms of horny college students with more hormones than wisdom.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

This advice isn’t going to sit well with campus feminists.

Dr. Root:

The only thing that sits well with campus feminists is a double-stuffed burrito. Have you seen them lately? Fat and so ugly! And with the purple hair! Really, between me and you and the rest of America, most of these rape hysterics are the fantasies of lonely women pretending they have to beat the men off with a stick.

Dr. Root:

And unintended pregnancies and that they cannot say at one time, at the height of arousal, just when he’s very aroused, strong erection, when she’s very aroused, either he or she cannot change their mind. I know it’s controversial, but I have to stand up and believe for what I believe in. I know it has something to do with Title 9, with money that goes to universities. I’m very worried about that. And people like you and me, who have this power, especially you right now on NPR, of the airwaves, do have to talk about that.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Indeed. I think that there is a great deal to what you say. This is my way of deflecting that NPR shitlibs like myself will never talk about that. Here’s an email Dr. Root, from John Scalzi in.. well how about that another one from San Francisco. He says, what are your thoughts on the transgender phenomenon and how cultures are or are not accepting transgender individuals? How do you see this evolving over time?

Dr. Root:

I have never been ashamed or worried by saying people who want to change their sex are mentally sick and emotionally combustible. It’s a good idea to refrain from encouraging their sickness.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

All right. Let’s go to… a bus depot rest room in San Francisco? Alex Pareene, you’re on the air.

Alex Pareene:

I’m a single guy. I have these internet dating apps and so on and so forth. And it seems like it’s given single people the attention span of goldfish. And I don’t know what you know about it, but I was just wondering what do you think the long term effects of these dating sites, like Tinder or Plenty of Fish or any of that. What do you think that has, you know, what the future holds for that?

Dr. Root:

Easy, atomized sex. Hard relationships. Fertility crashes. Civilization implosion. But be careful, use protection. As long as you do that, no problem.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Here’s an email that says, “my wife and I are in a difficult place. We love each other. She says she’s attracted to me, but has no interest in being amorous with me, because she does not feel emotionally connected. I feel that being amorous with each other is one way to help rebuild the emotional connection. But I don’t want to press the issue for fear of driving her away even further. Do you have any thoughts on how we can bridge this gap?”

Dr. Root:

Yes, you are a beta male. You have to be less of a beta male and more of an alpha male. Your wife isn’t doing this intentionally. Her arousal isn’t something she can control. It has to be stimulated. Oh yes, I know I’m a sex therapist, but “talking it out” is absolutely the worst thing you can do. It will dry her pussy right up, like a slug under a salt shaker. Be more demanding, be less kind and generous, be cocky and confident, tease her, make fun of her, leave for indeterminate spells, and flirt with other women in her presence. Then your wife will come around to loving you again.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Mother of god…

Dr. Root:

No, I am the father of god.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

On the other hand, if she says I don’t want to see a therapist, he should go by himself, shouldn’t he?

Dr. Root:

If he’s a mangina of small testicle, yes. Or, if the therapist is a sexy woman and he wants to boff her, then he should go see her.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

All right, and here is a posting on Facebook. What about the phenomenon of the “Fifty Shades of Gray” franchise? Where is the line between healthy and unhealthy in role playing and fantasy like the against my will fantasy, that’s actually consensual? On the other hand, we are hyper-vigilant about criminal rape on campus and elsewhere. And on the other, we supposedly agree that power exchange role playing is a normal and exciting thing in sexuality.

Dr. Root:

Torture-rape porn for women.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Women like this?

Dr. Root:

Women get aroused by the thought of submitting to a powerful, dominant man. Women are sexually charged by their vulnerability and submission, but only to a man worthy of taking it from them.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Why the S&M aspect?

Dr. Root:

Arousal amplification.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

This is all so… refreshing. Exciting. For me to hear. MmmmMMmmmm….

Dr. Root:

Ta Nahisi Coates! Safety word! Ta Nahisi Coates!

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Sorry. Ok, where were we. Let’s go now to Witch’s Coven, Massachusetts. Amanda Marcotte, you’re on the air.

Amanda Marcotte:

Hi. Yes, I wanted to first thank Dr. Root, because as I was coming of age, she was on a lot of the talk shows and in the news a lot, and gave me a different perspective on being able to explore and to ask questions about and not feel ashamed about questioning different things. But also, I wondered what her opinion was on the, especially with millennials, but with each successive generation, the disconnect from intimate acts and emotional bonds. That there’s quite a bit of not just one night stands, but one event relationships.

Dr. Root:

So I’m old fashioned and a square. I  don’t want to see more sexually transmitted diseases, if it’s different partners. Use protection! And shave your manjaw.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

You tell everyone to use protection. Is there more to sex therapy than that?

Dr. Root:

There is, but not for the close-minded NPR audience.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

I am old fashioned and a square, as well. Let’s go, finally, to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. FrankNBeans, you’re on the air. Quickly, please.

FrankNBeans:

I have a question for you. I know you met Howard Stern recently. Maybe a year or two ago, and, you know, he is certainly kind of a force out there in the media world. But you know, by talking about sexuality and his small penis, to be specific, do you think he’s doing a good thing for the world of sexuality and men, in particular?

Dr. Root:

Bababooey? Ok, truthfully, Howard may have a small penis, but it doesn’t hurt him with the ladies. Last time I was on his show, he wanted to talk about something I didn’t want to talk about. My prehensile penis. He is very jealous of it. It’s a medical wonder, my penis. I can hit the G spot and cervical aperture with the same thrust!

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Wow just wow. That’s it folks. Lots of love and thanks for listening. I’m going to my John Stewart hurt locker to masturbate furiously under a poster of his vapid smirk.

Did you know Megyn Kelly, Cuck News airhead, is a lawyercunt? After last night’s debate, her former vocation makes perfect sense. Watch the first 0:45 seconds of this outtake.

Trump effortlessly bats away her attempt to entrap him into cuckservative apologia for imaginary misogyny. Can’t stump the Trump! The audience (including women) applauds. MegYn fumes and tries to shout over Trump’s shit-eating grin (it’s a loud grin).

At 0:30, watch for Megyn Kelly’s Resting Bitch Face. You can see her Nurse Ratched butthurt driving her into a seething rage. She must be loads of post-coital fun.

Feminist idiocy is out of control. Trump’s mild rebuke of another instance of femcuntery polluting “the national conversation” is so rare to hear issuing from these insipid public spectacles that have become evermore the trademark of late stage democracy, that it was like a refreshing blast of cool mountain air, clearing away shrike noise.

Hey, MegYn, the Trumpenkrieg (h/t MPC) has called lots of men bad words too. Do you think this means Trump is a man-hater, like yourself? Logic trap much? Projection much?

Or maybe it means that when Trump levels an insult at a fat bitch dyke, the recipient really is a fat bitch dyke.

If you want presidential debates to be female solipsism cranked up to jet engine volume, if you yearn for a political platform that is ALL ABOUT MEGYN KELLY’S FEELS and war on women garbage, and not at all about the mortal threats — immigration, debt, unaffordable family formation, foreign entanglements, anti-white antiracism, White dispossession of the nation they created, oligarch control of the political process — facing America, then by all means let’s bring ALL THE WOMEN into the political arena. They’re really good at turning what should be serious debate into feminist twaddle and their hurt feelings.

The more the Hivemind (and this includes Cuck News) goes after Trump with no pretense of fair play or objectivity, the more I’m convinced there’s a directive from the ruling class to their minions with the megaphones to take him down no matter the cost. Trump makes them deathly afraid. Why are they so afraid of him? They can’t buy him. Ok. That’s one reason. He shits on their Open Borders agenda. That’s another.

Mostly though, it’s that Trump isn’t a piss-ant, puling, wind-up betaboy toy, the controlled opposition ready and willing to dance to the tune of the Narrative Enforcers. He’s the renegade outsider, bringing the cleansing chaos of Realtalk, however fledgling, to the Old Order of Lies.

200+ comments from readers eager to take on the latest “Test of Your Game” challenge, and it is yer ‘umble shiv-sharpener’s duly considered opinion that many excellent responses (and some awful ones, for flavor) were offered up for Chateau judgement.

Recall the parameters:

Need game advice. Buying condoms. Cashier is very cute hard 8. Buying only condoms because I have a sex life and do, in fact, need them. But could always use more plates. I’m 40; she’s 26.

What is my funny opener to the sales clerk ringing up my condoms?

Store is nearly empty. Would be easy to chat her up. Ask her to come help me try them out? Just say “come get coffee with me on your break”? Also I live 3 minutes from here. She’d get the benefit of three orgasms if she’s lucky enough to come with me to my pad.

Box o’ condoms. Cute, younger cashier. Near-vacant store. Favorable logistics. What do you do?

da GBFM lzzzzzzzzlzlz™ takes a whack at it.

true story:

DA GBFM: does u have two dozen extra magnum magna cum ladue XXXL condomsz? and a phone numberz?

lzozozozolozozooz

Direct, confident, funny… and unlikely to succeed. But it will provide great entertainment for anyone who happens to be waiting next in line at the register.

condom rating: 3 out of 5 standard issue trojans.

***

Anonymous writes,

ALWAYS make a pickup/number attempt. “Here, put your number in my iPhag.” Then test it to make sure that she didn’t give you a fake number.

If you actually say the word “iPhag”, your game is Winning.

condom rating: 3 out of 5 ribbed for her pleasure.

***

cukn fapn goes for the funny bone,

“Excuse me, where’s the fitting room?”

There’s a good chance she’ll laugh, and if she’s laughing, her vagina is presenting.

condom rating: 4 out of 5 pig bladder rubbers.

***

Oberyn Martell, another comedian,

*Drop condoms*

“If this doesn’t work out, you happen to be a sitter on the side?”

The dumber girls might not get this right away.

condom rating: 2 out of 5 red and green seasonal specials.

***

walawala gets risque,

“I’m just on my way to a kids party, I blow them up and make animals out of them…”

When she starts laughing say…I’m a magician I could use an assistant…

Take it from there.

This is the first serious attempt at converting the humorous opener into a pickup segue. Very good. Downside: As another commenter mentioned, associating kids with condoms could backfire.

condom rating: 5 out of 5 rosemary-scented Yankee condoms.

***

Jack H goes balls to the wall,

Rip the flap off the box and tell her to write her number on it.

This would take some brass ones, but there’s potential. You don’t even have to wait for an indicator of attraction from her. A routine like this would surprise and intrigue her instantly.

condom rating: 5 out of 5 warming sheaths.

***

Tittysac McGee remembers that sometimes the best game is the least expected game.

While sporting shit eating grin:

Do you have these in extra small?

Clownish self-deprecation can work wonders in some situations.

Condom rating: 3 out of 5 extra large.

***

“N” opens a line of communication to the female hindbrain,

Buy like four packs and confess that you were just released from prison.

Heh. A depressing number of girls will bite on this.

condom rating: 5 out of 5 ex-con edition condoms (XL reservoir tip)

***

shartiste grounds everyone reading this,

Opening with any kind of joke or reference to the condoms might sound funny in an internet comment section but comes off as a bit try hard and corny IRL.

Just game as usual and let the condoms give some built in sexual tension.

This is the sensible approach suited for the average beta male. Running regular game against an unspoken backdrop of a box of condoms is not only funny, it’s tension-building.

condom rating: 3 out of 5 two-ply baby-stoppers.

***

Benny Profane, living up to his name,

Put condoms on counter. Maintain direct eye contact while taking a dump on floor.

I laughed. She won’t.

condom rating: 0 out of 5 rubbers with poked holes.

***

Who says you need to speak? asylum writes,

Say nothing and smile with your best James Bond smirk.
Laconic = winner
I presume you shop there often, so you’ll see her again, and she will remember you.

Just don’t break that smirk or that eye contact prematurely in a fit of giggles, or the jig is up.

condom rating: 4 out of 5 silent sausage sheaths.

***

Fredrik, on subliminal seduction,

Ask hows her evening is and make small talk while buying the condoms, then after the condoms are purchased while holding the condoms in your hand ask her if shes free tonight? and tell her that she seems like a cool person.Make eye contact all the time and tap the condom packet like a slow beat into the palm of your other hand while asking.

Note: No need for jokes here, simply ask her out with the condoms in hand. Thats more than funny enough, but you have to have very high self esteem to pull it off in the correct charming way. You have to send of the signal that you are serious, but at the same time you obviously have great humour and confidence. I like my comment so much I might in fact go and try this out for myself.

If you have the acting class chops to pull this off, I could easily see the girl slowly grinning and asking what your deal is. Then the road is wide open.

condom rating: 5 out of 5 nuclear tipped pocket rocket protectors.

“American wife, mother and entrepreneur.”

This is how Trump’s HB9 daughter Ivanka describes herself. As a commenter said, note the order.

When a daughter happily describes herself first and foremost as an American wife and mother, you know her father is an alpha male.

Trump for President. “Make America Alpha Again”

***

Meanwhile, in an alternate beta male universe, pygmy Columba rattles ¡Jabe!’s raisinettes in a guacamole bowl and warns him to “remember where you came from”.

***

If Trump does nothing else but close the border and take photo ops like this one:

America will have taken a big step away from lunacy and beta maleness, and toward rock-ribbed alpha maleness.

With a First Family like Trump’s representing your nation, who wouldn’t feel a swell (heh) of pride for America once again? Morning (After) In America.

***

Prediction: Donald Trump will take Steve Sailer’s advice for the Republicans and make a concerted effort to appeal to White men voters. The rest of the Republican field, on cue, will cuck their way to irrelevancy.

***

Related: What’s at stake.

Cuckservatives, leftoid equalists, and feminists all share a mental disorder in common: the habitual denial of human nature. The ways in which these groups deny human nature are far too numerous to list in one blog post, but commenter Tempus Fuckit (heh) tangentially reminds us of one way that often escapes the notice of even steely-eyed realists.

This. Hit. Hard.

My oneitis is currently on a career tankgrrl rampage (she’s 22)..

“My mom told me not to rely on a man for money.”

..to the grave.

The cultural embrace of the iconic gogrrl careerist femborg isn’t just a feminist and equalist rallying cry; one will often hear cuckservatives mouth the very same “encourage our young women to succeed in the workforce” platitudes that animate their supposed ideological opposites.

And now mothers. If the denial of human nature is a barometer of societal illness, then the wholesale acceptance and advocacy of the careegrrl lifestyle by mothers forecasts the arrival of some seriously inclement weather.

Platitudes like “don’t rely on a man for money” have a way of gripping less agile minds and taking hold for life. Superficially, it sounds sensible; one may convince oneself, “if men won’t commit and ‘man up’ for women, then women should take the necessary precautions against indigence and establish self-sustainable careers for themselves.”

The problem with this simplistic formulation originates in the faulty premise that men and women are alike in all ways but the genitalia. This flawed premise allows for the psychological projection of the female-specific predilection for receiving material support onto men; it tacitly assumes, in other words, that women are as comfortable providing for themselves (and for others) as men are, and that men will promptly abandon their intrinsic role as resource providers as soon as women agree in principle or practice to be dependent upon men.

The core plank of modern feminism — careergrrl empowerment — rests on a horrible misunderstanding of human, and especially male, nature. It’s a misunderstanding, deliberate or deluded, that follows from an arid, de-sexualized, transactional view of relations between men and women.

“If/Then” algorithms are shaky substitutes for human sexual market feedback loops. While transactional analysis of human behavior has some usefulness as a predictive model, it quickly reveals its limitations when we draw comparisons between the decision-making processes of the sexes. An error in thinking of this magnitude will result in wrong conclusions like the one above: That men are as fickle and uncertain about providing for women as women are about providing for men, and therefore women ought to ensure their own economic self-sufficiency.

The reality is much different once we account for continuously operating SMP feedback loops. The vulnerable unemployed or underemployed young woman arouses the natural instinct in men to provide for her and protect her against hardship. As long as she has the requisite physical attributes to catch men’s eyes, there will be more than enough (white or asian) men happy to share their hard-earned material abundance with her in implied exchange for her sex and love and fidelity.

This is what feminists, cuckservatives, and Narrative-soaked social scientists don’t get about the sexes: What one sex may do in response to a given stimulus is not necessarily what the other sex would do. Men possess a moral sense, (or a character trait, if you prefer less loaded language), that compels them to provide generously for pretty young women who prove their sexual loyalty and low partner count. Women don’t have this moral sense, not in the way it is used here. Women are eager to provide many things to the men they love — most of all their bodies — but they aren’t psychologically driven to transfer their own material resources to indigent men the way men are driven to lavish largesse on indigent, comely women. Women may do this when circumstances align just right, but it won’t come from a place of deep personal fulfillment from the act of doing so. It will come from a place, instead, brewing with resentment and confusion.

So, the career tankgrrl’s mom is wrong. Tankgrrl, assuming she has the goods to attract a sufficient number of decent resource-ready men, should rely on men for money, because men are happy, indeed driven as if by some otherworldly force, to give to women for whom they feel intense physical desire and love.

Once Tankgrrl has stopped relying on men for money… once she has traveled far down the road of invulnerable feminist empowerment, leaning in the whole way… she should not be surprised to find that fewer and fewer men along each mile marker are waiting and willing to give to her what she has already given to herself.

Feminism, in this way, becomes a self-fulfilling whine. The more feminist a woman gets, the more men will retreat from her, and the more her feminist man-hating will seem like the appropriate response to her romantic failures.

There will be exceptions, of course. There always are when human nature is the topic. Ugly or old women may really have no choice but to become financially viable on their own, and for them a healthy society recognizes their need of taking the “feminist” path. But a healthy society would never elevate those exceptions to a 24/7 propaganda blitz, insisting that every woman follow the same life script as those poor unfortunate souls who have no choice in the matter.

As always, it comes down to exalting beauty, rejecting ugliness, and living not by lies.

Reader corvinus paraphrases a recent Chateau contribution to our collective understanding of feminism:

Feminism: teaching women to be second-rate men rather than first-rate women.

An earlier Chateau definition of feminism stated the following:

The goal of feminism is to remove all constraints on female sexuality while maximally restricting male sexuality.

The two CH definitions are related, the first being a subset of the second. To the second, I would only add “sexuality and morality” for completeness, as the sexes in their natural states tend to stress accordance to differing, yet complementary, moralities.

The goal of feminism is thus the destruction of the feminine in women and of the masculine in men. Feminism as an ideology seeks the annulment of sex-based distinctions and dichotomy, to be replaced by an androgynous slop that vulgarizes women and enfeebles men, and is at its heart dehumanizing.

Brief historical aside: The origin of American feminism as an organizing principle goes back to the 19th century, although there were rare, individual (European) women who lived well before then authoring proto-feminist books, and probably not coincidentally, these women were usually ugly and/or forced by circumstance to provide for themselves.

As was the case with Rome, the rise of feminism parallels the accumulating wealth and prestige of nations or empires. Affluence may be a causative factor of feminist idiocy, or it may be a correlative factor. Either way, once a nation has succumbed to materialism, it has succumbed to feminism, and once a nation has allowed feminism a toehold in the body politic, decadence and decline are not far behind.

The roots of feminism are found primarily in the suffrage movement, and secondarily in the effects that growing wealth have on the behaviors of men and on social equality. (It’s not well-known that many of the American first-wave feminists were Evangelical Christians who wanted the government to have a stronger role promoting morality, e.g., the temperance movement. These ur-feminists were in many respects decidedly conservative women.)

As the wealth disparity between the mass of beta male providers and the fat cats grew, women began to feel insecure that marriage to the average joe would save them from a life of penury. It was from this seed that the feminist “careergrrl” movement germinated, and it was this seed that the proto-globalist cosmopolitan fat cats wanted so eagerly to plant, to enlarge their customer base and divide families against themselves.

Whatever righteousness there could be found in the ideology’s original intent, feminism regressed rapidly (in nation-state life-cycle times) to a twisted, brutish, stupid dogma, that today has reached its inevitable nadir in campus rape hoaxes, Title IX, and fat acceptance, among many other bizarro world feminist social incursions that blatantly defy human nature. Inevitable, because as with all leftist missions, satisfaction from earlier victories only encourages more bloodlust, and the course of conquest always ends in desolation when the last enemy of the movement has been picked clean to the bone.

So we have as explanations for the rise of feminism affluence, wealth and income inequality, and decadence. To this we can add out-breeding, the marriage pattern among White Europeans (and, later, Americans) that split cousin-marriage kinship ties and created evolutionary selection pressures leading to a people with a high degree of trust and out-group altruism. Taken to extremes, this characteristic feature of Whites, genetically embedded for maximum staying power, promotes the beliefs and consequent social policies of “gender egalitarianism”, which is nothing less than the total rebuke of the existence of natural, organic, and psychologically healthy sex-based differences in mind and body.

Feminism is lies, ugliness, and malevolence, and that is why it must be opposed by any shiv necessary.

The Wall Is Everywhere

From a United Nations report, a chart of the prices that ISIS charges for concubines.

*Children between ages 1 and 9 includes boys.

Even if this is exaggerated neocon propaganda, the trend illuminated by the chart is likely authentic, because an ur-feminist organization like the UN would not be given to propagandizing the low sex slave worth of 40+ year old women.

There are some universal truths about the nature of the sexes exposed through revealed preferences (and pricing) that even primitive barbarians can find common ground with effete Westerners.

%d bloggers like this: