The Era Of The Psychocunt

What social media has accomplished and which dwarfs all other impacts it has had on the culture, is this: It has weaponized female attention whoring. Check this out:

I am about to tell you an epic tale about subterfuge, dating in the 21st century and the fall of human civilization. This actually happened to me and it could happen to you too. Get some popcorn. *Thread*

— миша (@bvdhai) August 19, 2018

There are too many psychocunts in the USA to count, but this one stands above the rabble. Short story: using an advanced hot-cold, ghost-unghost technique, she lured hundreds of thirsty beta males on Tinder with promises of a hot date (“we can see what happens”), to meet her at the foot of an outdoor NYC stage where she would be to see a DJ perform. Our intrepid Thirst Brother treks to the location, and realizes, along with the rest of the beta dupes there, that he’d been had. In his words:

I make my way to Union Square. Eat a hot dog and look over by this open lot by 17th Ave and there is a stage and a DJ and about 100 ppl and cameras and shit and I think well this is some random ass Manhattan shit. […]

Eventually I see a girl moving towards backstage with two enormous bodyguards in sunglasses and realise it’s her and I’m thinking WHAT THINE FUCKETH IS GOING ON

ed: urkel alert.

I stay back and assess the situation and I’m like fuck I’mma stay right where I am til she texts me. The DJ eventually stops playing and she gets on the stage and I’m so fucking confused but think well I guess she’s a social media personality or some shit

She gets the mic and is like thanks for coming out I bet you’re all wondering what this is about and I’m like yeah what the fuck is this about

She then says so I know all of you here are on tinder and I’m like 🤔

Then she says I’ve invited you all here for a chance to go on a date with me and proceeds to give a hunger games speech about what its gonna take to date her

ALL THE DUDES THERE SHE FOUND ON TINDER AND TEXTED THEM THE SAME SHIT

Every man in the crowd looks down and mimes WHAT IN THE NAME OF SCOOBY DOO THE IS THIS SHIT to themself

At that point I am genuinely amazed at the fallopian fortitude this girl possesses. This is top 10 greatest finesse of all time. Dudes actually stayed and played.

This is what a corrupted sexual market looks like: a horrible female-favorable sex skew (whether numerical or attitudinal) giving rise to an army of psychocunt attention whores, leading a pathetic mob of thirsty betas by the nose, and cajoling them into a livestreamed “let’s you and you and you and you and him fight” battle royale for bitchcoin and vajtreonics (but no sex).

If this sounds like a boner-killing hellscape, you’d be right! And the only answer is Game. Lots of it. The motherfucking Script of The World must be mega-flipped to give men a fighting chance in a Western sexual market gone completely rogue.

This won’t surprise CH readers paying close attention, but based on a photo taken of her back, our psychocunt looks to be high T (or low E). Notice the linebacker shoulders and boyhips:

That’s a body made for Dread Game.

***

Sentient dug up a pic of her from the front:

Not much to look at. Charitably, a soft 7. Which is why so many beta males figured they had a chance with her.

She, obviously, is extremely bitter about men. Tooling all those betas must have slaked her thirst for vengeance something good. Except, not. She will continue pining for the alpha jerkboy who pumped and dumped her, taking out her spite on all the beta males who follow in her alpha widowhood wake.

***

Courtesy of Sentient, a better frontal view pic of Our Lady of Lording it Over Thirsty Betas:

Yeeeeeah, based on this high-res shot, I’m gonna have to downgrade my initial assessment of her from a soft 7 to a hard 6. Also, is anyone else getting shtetl vibes to go along with the powerful slut vibes?

The Diversitroid Fuggernaut’s Latest Tactic: Ostracize The White Male Leadership

When will Shanica Johnson be fired for anti-White bigotry? For her hate speech? Not holding breath. (If anything, the NewYidTimes will be calling her for a job interview.)

She seems a bit confused about the workings of miscegenation. If black men increasingly shack up with White mudsharks and make mystery meatballs together, that means fewer black men for black women, who have to find partners outside of their race or go to their morbidly obese, steatopygous graves lonely and prognathically bitter at the White men (or any men) who aren’t interested in relieving black women of their YASS INCEL status.

Second, middle aged White men are rapidly becoming a minority IN THE DEMOCORTEZ PARTY. The Trump Party (née Republican Party) will in reaction become a party predominately comprised of WHITE MEN and married White women who retain allegiance to Team White.

Then we will have the grounds established for Civil War 2. Beautiful.

The bigger picture here is a trend I’ve noticed taking shape in the past few months. The Diversitroid Fuggernaut and allied degenerate freak White leftists are attempting to drive a wedge between “middle aged White men” and all other Whites. They are beginning to wake up to the fact that being virulently bigoted against ALL Whites will blow up in their faces, so they’re massing their anti-White firepower against middle aged White men, the putative leaders of any nascent political movement that would more explicitly advocate for White interests. Their strategy is a simple one: ostracize established, effective White Men who are admired in their communities and natural born leaders of anything worth leading — i.e., make them “uncool” — and the splintered White factions awakening to their wholesale dispossession won’t have a strong, reliable, authoritative base of White men to effectively gel around in opposition to District N1g.

The Grotesqueries have convinced themselves that if Whites flee from any association with “middle aged White men” then there is nothing stopping nonWhites from terraforming America into an arab bazaar, a black ghetto, and a brown favela. A baghela (heh).

They may be right; but I suspect they have overlooked a powerful force cresting the horizon:

Generation Zyklon.

PS White men have to stop spending shekels on sportsball. It’s the only message these ingrates will understand. More precisely, it’s one of only two messages these ingrates will understand.

PPS Pointed comment from FastEddie,

Yep. Don’t know how many times I have to say it. Quit adding to the narrative that the n***ers are the cool kids. They’re not forbidden (that would set their panties on fire faster than the f*g from Twilight.) They’re just diseased, gross, and the only women who mud shark are jokes.

Turn off Afroball
Cancel Jooflix
Raise your own SMV personally, physically, financially
Do not bang mud sharks. Ostracize them.

If just 25% of White Men did this, at the very least, we’d bring afroball to its knees. (heh)

Glad you’re all my bros.
FE

Animal Farm, Trumperica Edition

In an Animal Farm set in the President Trump timeline,

the media would be… (Squealer the pig/the sheep)

the alt-right would be….(Benjamin the donkey)

the GOP cucks would be….(Boxer the horse)

antifa would be…(the dogs)

the globalist elite would be….(mr jones)

Heritage America would be…(the hens)

YKW would be….(too easy)

And Trump would be…?

Thought Criminal Target Locked And Deplatformed

The InfoWars saga (and Daily Stormer before it) are meant to be object lessons to discourage the others. The swarm-like nature of the operation by leftoids, against a readily identifiable and personalized crimethinker, betrays its real purpose: to silence an entire segment of the population.

Active censorship is just the tip of the speech-chilling iceberg. Like I wrote, leftoids are playing with a super-weapon which in their hubris think they can control without blowback. They will overreach, as they’re doing now, and the weapon will turn on its wielder.

There is only one way this super-weapon remains in the control of one faction for a sufficient length of time to generationally entrench its power: by ratcheting up the lethality and area of effect of its payload. Mass censorship requires increasingly totalitarian suppressions to prevent its use from provoking an even more righteous counter-attack.

Mass murderers like Stalin knew this. And here we go again.

As Night Follows Day

Max Woke quips,

I’m sensing a sexual assault charge in this weasel’s future.

His accuser will be the boybody slut standing to his left, while he will wish his accuser was the redeemable redhead two slores down.

If you barged through that herpes wall, groping everything in your path on the way through, would they even have grounds to complain? You’re self-avowed sluts, what’s the problem?

(i only partly keed, because it takes two to tango, and if women want to be treated like porcelain objects no man shall brush against then women have to fulfill their end of the deal and not walk around in camel toe shorts baring their floppy tits while demanding white knight protection and lesser males to avert their gaze on punishment of psychological castration.)

Male chivalry doesn’t exist in a vacuum. One sex’s duty requires the other sex’s duty.

The Vapid “Past Immigration, Ergo Perpetual Immigration” Argument

Ah, not a day goes by without the treat of (((shitlibs))) trying to gull the un-woke with broken logic that sounds real purty on the surface. The latest is the uncle of that basest of jews, Stephen Miller, throwing his nephew under the bus to feed his tikkun olam-sized ego.

If my nephew’s ideas on immigration had been in force a century ago, our family would have been wiped out.

By DAVID S. GLOSSER August 13, 2018

Let me tell you a story about Stephen Miller and chain migration.

It begins at the turn of the 20th century, in a dirt-floor shack in the village of Antopol, a shtetl of subsistence farmers in what is now Belarus. Beset by violent anti-Jewish pogroms and forced childhood conscription in the Czar’s army, the patriarch of the shack, Wolf-Leib Glosser, fled a village where his forebears had lived for centuries and took his chances in America.

He set foot on Ellis Island on January 7, 1903, with $8 to his name. …

What does this classically American tale have to do with Stephen Miller? Well, Izzy Glosser is his maternal grandfather, and Stephen’s mother, Miriam, is my sister.

Boom, drop the ( )ike!

I have watched with dismay and increasing horror as my nephew, an educated man who is well aware of his heritage, has become the architect of immigration policies that repudiate the very foundation of our family’s life in this country.

Because America had past immigration, it must have endless future immigration. Unassailable logic!

Reality: any nation, including America, has the right and moral justification to turn on or off at any time the immigration spigot as accords the national interest. David Glosser’s self-serving indignation is not Americans’ moral crisis.

Or: get over it, glosser.

ps Ellis Island is just one of many “classically American tales”. You know what else is a classically American tale? The 1924 Immigration and Naturalization Act that severely curtailed immigration and restricted it to European Whites, leading to the greatest explosion in a country’s standard of living ever seen in history.

I shudder at the thought of what would have become of the Glossers had the same policies Stephen so coolly espouses— the travel ban, the radical decrease in refugees, the separation of children from their parents, and even talk of limiting citizenship for legal immigrants — been in effect when Wolf-Leib made his desperate bid for freedom.

American citizens are making a desperate bid for a livable country that isn’t overrun by foreign scabs and ingrates.

The Glossers came to the U.S. just a few years before the fear and prejudice of the “America first” nativists of the day closed U.S. borders to Jewish refugees.

Just missed!

Ya know, there’s another logical conclusion one could reach from Glosser’s glossing of mass immigration: Americans shouldn’t have let in all those bubbes.

Whatta pain in the tuckus they’ve been!

Is anyone else getting tired of maudlin shysters weeping schlockodile tears for the fate of a nation they are determined to destroy under a flood of culturally and genetically foreign migrants?

***

From commenter Another Dad,

As much as it makes the steam rise, i love seeing the likes of Glosser put this in print.

The whole “nation of immigrants” thing is objectively stupid. Mathematically, immigration forever means that the future America must assymptotically approach the shittiness of the shittiest nation on the planet–until literally no one else on earth wants to come here! Your line–your genetic contribution to the future–will either be extinguished or your descendants scrape by in an overpopulated dystopian hell hole.

It’s the anti-thesis of patriotism or love of nation. It’s wishing the nation’s destruction and extintion.

Now i realize i’m a few SD’s to the right of the average person in mathematical “sense”, so what’s obvious to me doesn’t immediately pop for everyone. But the more these bastards keep broadcasting their idea that immigration *must never stop* the more the average person will wake up and smell the insanity and the hate.

Mass Shitholiness (multiple entendres intended) is no way to make America great again.

And malevolent ingrates are no one anybody should take seriously.

***

Another sharp comment from Another Dad,

First off there is no reason to take any immigrants. What happened in the Americas was “conquest”. The US certainly didn’t really require any immigrants after the founding, but they–like my immigrant ancestors–juiced the conquest a bit. Certainly immigrants were redundant by the closure of the frontier say 1880.

But if you decide “hey, i’ll add a few folks to the team”, what would be the first requirement? Loyalty. They’ll mentally and emotionally join up, become part of your nation and put the interests of their new fellow citizens first.

Some people naturally take to that. Some people, some peoples, just massively fail that basic test.

I’m noticing that Maul-Right acolytes are becoming quite adept at not only challenging the Left’s framing, but reframing the debates altogether to utterly neuter and shut out the Left’s typical litany of feelgood debate points. Another Dad reimagines the frame perfectly when he denies the very premise of taking in *any* number of immigrants at any time.

Our rhetorical weaponry is getting more lethal.

The Media’s and Big Tech’s War On Free Speech

It’s chilling ‘cuz it’s true.

From the VDare feed:

Free speech has no greater enemy than the so-called #FreePress.

The government isn’t going to deplatform you, try to get you fired, and cheer on assaults against you.

Journalists will.

I’m calling it the REEE Press. The press REEEs indignantly, then hunts down the crimethinker and casts him to the icy wastelands.

Short-term solution: Make whorenalists the story.

The “free press” in alliance with their left-wing technodweeb symbiotes are deplatforming dissident voices faster than you can count, and are justifying the Stalinist Silencing by claiming that the victims of their inquisition are “inciting violence“.

Media: *incites violence against whites, cops, trump, republican congressmen, alt-righters*

PSYCHOLOGICAL_PROJECTION.EXE

Media: “Alex Jones incites violence!”

That biting quip comes to mind.

Leftoid: “my violence is speech, your speech is violence”

PS Brad Parscale, President Trump’s Viking warrior-slash-tech guru, says “Big Tech is becoming Big Brother“.

Big Tech has a big bias problem.

Social media platforms that once facilitated the free exchange of ideas and information are now actively seeking to silence and censor conservative opinions.

This new Orwellian impulse that is taking over Big Tech is particularly problematic because social media websites, which are supposed to be safe spaces for all free speech, get special legal perks.

Under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, websites such as Facebook and Twitter are not treated as publishers of “information provided by another” — which would subject them to libel laws and other headaches publishers have to deal with — because they “offer a forum for a true diversity of political discourse.”

This means social media platforms are not merely private companies who can censor whomever they wish — They are considered, by law, to be public forums that allow free and open debate.

Yet, they’re doing the exact opposite. They are stifling online speech, warping the national discourse, and obstructing the free flow of ideas. Big Tech is not just biased against conservatives — it is actively trying to silence them and deprive them of online platforms.

Big Tech’s bias was on full display recently when conservative activist Candace Owens was suspended from Twitter for satirical tweets mimicking the racist, anti-white tweets of New York Times editorial board member Sarah Jeong — who has never been suspended from Twitter despite a history of racist comments.

Parscale used the term “anti-White”.

Which means Trump has heard the term “anti-White”.

Which means it will appear in a Trump tweet very soon.

Which means the Left’s whole facade will come crashing down and their salty tears will flood the zone.

Twitter isn’t the only major social media site with a demonstrated history of bias against conservatives. Facebook is infamous for its lopsided application of its “community standards.” Conservative content is regularly removed from the site while vile, often violent, radical left-wing content is left alone. Recently, a GOP congressional candidate’s ad was banned because it depicted images of the Cambodian genocide.

To make matters worse, the social media giant recently changed its feed algorithms — ostensibly to combat fake news — but the result has been a suspicious and significant drop in the reach of conservative pages and advertisements. A study found that while liberal publishers saw a roughly 2 percent increase in web traffic from Facebook following the algorithm changes, conservative ones saw a loss of traffic averaging around 14 percent.

Big Tech’s anti-conservative bias is positively institutional. Facebook, Google (YouTube), and Twitter all work with the Southern Poverty Law Center, a far-left organization with a proven track record of anti-conservative bias, to decide what is and isn’t “hate speech.”

Unfortunately, it doesn’t look like Big Tech is set to return to its free speech roots anytime soon. The Left clearly no longer values free speech at all. […]

What we are seeing in Big Tech is the inherent totalitarian impulse of the Left come into full focus. The Left is losing at the ballot box, and there are some signs it is starting to lose the culture war too. The free and open Internet has been indispensable in spreading conservative ideas, and it was indispensable in getting Donald Trump elected president — and now the Left wishes to destroy it.

Hot DAMN Parscale dropped the hammer on the Leftoid speech police.

This is great news. Parscale has Trump’s ear; if Trump is getting daily updates about the coordinated censorship campaign of social media companies to silence right-wing populists and race realtalkers, then it’s a good bet that as soon as the battlefield clears a little for Trump to really flex his political and people capital, he will crush these anti-American technopolies and media propagandists with the MAGA Mjölnir.

Pray for Trump and the warriors in his inner circle. Our enemies are cornered and roused to sputtering rage and are liable to lash out and do something extremely unwise.