Feeds:
Posts
Comments

¡SCIENCE, BITCHES! once again affirms Chateau Heartiste wisdom.

CHEATING ONCE MAKES YOU 300 PERCENT MORE LIKELY TO CHEAT IN YOUR NEXT RELATIONSHIP

Authored by Psychology Professor Kayla Knopp, the study surveyed 1,294 targeted participants, communicating with them periodically over five years. It found that, of the participants who had at least two romantic relationships in that time, those who reported cheating in the first relationship were three times more likely to do the same in the subsequent relationship. Furthermore, those who reported suspecting their partner of cheating in the first relationship were four times more likely to suspect the same of their next partner.

Once a cheating whore, always a cheating whore. Treat them accordingly (like funtime spunktime repositories).

Complementarily, once attracted to a cheating whore, always attracted to a cheating whore. Treat yourself accordingly (learn to identify sluts by their telltale cues).

“Infidelity can harm individuals and relationships, and these results can inform prevention or intervention efforts by targeting risk factors based on previous relationship patterns in addition to the various individual, relational, and contextual factors demonstrated to predict infidelity in previous work,” the study claimed.

A poundtown of prevention is worth a bounce of cure. Translation: Use and lose sluts.

The second linked study is an even bigger MOAB of feminism’s pretty lies.

Other studies on relationships found that, for women, the uncertainty of a relationship can increase attraction.

One study, titled “He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not … Uncertainty Can Increase Romantic Attraction,” was conducted on female undergraduates, but one of the researchers said she believes the findings would also be true for males. [ed: not alpha males] But how did this phenomenon come about? Are women bored by men who are clearly into them? [ed: disenchanted might be the better word]

“Uncertainty affects our thoughts in general,” Erin R. Whitchurch, one of the researchers, told ABC News.

Whitchurch said advanced technology messes with people’s minds because they have a million different ways to be contacted — like texting, calling and messaging on social media. With so many means of communication available, it’s a blow to one’s ego to be ignored. “Did he get my text yet” is no longer a concern. Instead, it’s “Why hasn’t he responded?” Whitchurch said. [ed: nah, this desire in women for emotionally vagabond men is older than social media]

Dread Game ftw. I really am ahead of my time. It is my delight and my curse.

From that seminal 2008 CH Dread Game post:

Women respond viscerally in their vagina area to unpredictability, mixed signals, danger, and drama in spite of their best efforts to convince themselves otherwise. Managing your relationship in such a way that she is left with a constant, gnawing feeling of impending doom will do more for your cause than all the Valentine’s Day cards and expertly performed tongue love in the world. Like it or not, the threat of a looming breakup, whether the facts justify it or not, will spin her into a paranoid estrogen-fueled tizzy, and she’ll spend every waking second thinking about you, thinking about the relationship, thinking about how to fix it. Her love for you will blossom under these conditions. […]

Examples of effective doom inducement:

Turn off your cell phone twice a week. Alternate days. Don’t do this on a Friday or Saturday night unless the relationship is shaky and needs a high voltage jolt of dread.

Make a blatant but plausibly deniable move on one of her friends when she’s not around. The news will get back to her. Milk it.

Call her from a very busy place so that she can hear women’s voices laughing and shrieking in the background. Don’t tell her where you are when she asks. Just say you’ll see her soon. […]

Like I’ve said, you’ll find more useful and insightful sociological and relationship analysis in the pages of this blog on one day than you’ll find in years’ worth of “relationship expert” boilerplate at pop media publications. And all for free! Am I crazy?

Continuation of a series.

Prosperous White shitlibs will never be comfortable with a high trust, fully functioning, pleasant Whiteopia. They’re too spastically moralizing and need tumult and discord to give their lives meaning, to have some problem into which they can pour their virtue signaling. This is why they will never stop advocating for the free flow of chaos across open borders.

The above truth is why liberalism is essentially female. Drama queens who stir shit to test the mettle of their men is a female stereotype for a reason.

Corporate-government collusion to subjugate a population used to be a dystopian Leftist fear, but it’s turned out to be a Leftist wet dream as the combined power of industry monopolies and the State silence an ever-expanding blacklist of dissident American voices.

Ass-chafed tattle-tale leftoids now run to their corporate overlords to report on uppity commoners who have strayed from the allowed Globohomo script. Power is the betrayal of self-described principles without suffering consequences.

Imagine if the RNC and hundreds of Republican celebs and wealthy elitist insiders were caught up in a web of sexual abuse and pedophilia glorification. Now imagine media reaction. It’d be 180 degrees from what it is now. There would be wall to wall coverage and bloodthirsty calls for vengeance. NPR would be so indignant their voices would never stop squeaking.

“British national” = foreign invader.

Like it or not, video gaming culture is extensive and rooted deeply enough to be a harbinger of social change. On a positive note, a major vidja game developer, Bethesda, has snuck in some potent anti-SJW realtalk in their new release Doom: Eternal. (Basic premise is that Global Corp opened portals to Hell to capture Hell’s energy source, and have employed holographic PC apparatchiks to allay Earthling fears of the inevitable demon invasion. Very topical!) Choice quotes:

“My brothers and sisters, let’s help to make our friends [ed: demons] transition into our world a comfortable one.

“[…] Remember: ‘Demon’ can be an offensive term, refer to them as ‘mortally challenged’.

“[…] Earth is the melting pot of the universe.”

Shitlibs, naturally, are incensed that their sacred cow — open borders equalism — was shivved by UGH BETA MALE GAMERS. When normally PC-compliant video game companies openly mock shitlib pretensions and virtue signaling, you know change is in the air. (There’s a small chance Bethesda game producers didn’t intentionally make the all-too-glaring comparison between real world open borders and game world demon invasion, assuming that the shitlib religion is so paramount to their self-identity that they have become incapable of noticing blatant racial metaphors in their own artistic creations. We’ll see if this is the case in Bethesda’s reaction, or non-reaction, to the SJW shriek fleet. Meanwhile, gamers (mostly White and male) are jubilant that Bethesda has taken the piss so roundly with the braying anti-White mobs.)

Some women are bitching that Trump shouldn’t use “sexist” language like calling omarosaparks a “dog”. Ladies, a lesson in tacit intersexual agreements: If you don’t want your looks to be a debate point, don’t be disloyal to your men. HTH.

There are disingenuous shitlibs who are now attempting a gotcha argument that Satan’s Sidecuck Strzok got fired for anti-Trump texts, a violation of his right to free speech, and claiming that demonstrates “right wing hypocrisy”. Last I checked, none of the right wingers deplatformed by Big Tech were in charge of two major investigations (one legit, one treasonous) into candidates for the Presidency.

The Catholic Church child abuse problem is a homosexual problem (most of the victims are young boys). The Catholic Church needs to drop the clerisy celibacy requirement. It’s been corrupted and used as a cover by hordes of homosexuals to infiltrate the institution and turn it into their gaypedo playground. All it would take to clean out the sphincter splitting sewage are a few happily sexed Chads of the Cloth giving no quarter to the degenerates.

The pro-clergy celibacy argument goes that celibate men don’t share their loyalties between God and Woman/Family. (Cynically, the church instituted the celibacy requirement to prevent inheritances from leaving Church coffers). The celibacy rule wasn’t instituted until 1,000 years after the Catholic Church was established. It can and should be reconsidered in light of modern realities.

A primer on how to subvert the subverters.

How many Americans will need to be silenced before the country hits a revolutionary pitch? The Left is playing with a super-weapon it currently possesses that it has no idea how to control.

Outgroup clans without power: deferential, contributory
Outgroup clans gaining power: subversive
Outgroup clans with too much power: tyrannical
Pattern recognition is your friend!

Once the data is gathered and analyzed, I bet it will show that the Democortez Party is becoming more enthusiastically socialist because
1. there is more wealth/income inequality in America
2. there are more nonWhites in the Dem coalition
3. the remaining Dem Whites are more leftist than past Dem Whites
4. the Dem Party is becoming predominately female in demographics and sensibility

There is a direct line running from increased Diversity to the creation of an Orwellian domestic surveillance state.

My opinion on the Holocaust: it happened, but jews took advantage of Gentile good will and began to hyperbolically inflate the death toll and manner of deaths. Really should be called the Hyperbolicaust.

Relentless, merciless, joyous mockery will kill the Left.

Leftoids are throwing money at Creep State operative Strzok who was heading up the soft coup of a duly elected President, and who now has the chutzpah to beg for money from dupes and Trump-deranged lunatics. Corruption in government? Scandal of the Century? No biggie, if the traitors and scoundrels were serving leftoid interests.

You can take it to the bank that a person who has never uttered an ethnic slur out loud has endlessly uttered them inside her head.

“Your speech is violence. Our violence is speech.”

When the buttplug hits pay dirt:

We all knew it was leading to this. “Hate speech” can be used to justify a censorship crackdown on just about anything that personally offends the sensibilities and earning power of the elites.

Some of Trump’s staffing decisions in the early months of his Administration seem like they weren’t deliberated so much as accumulated.

Leftoids wither under a regime of Truth & Beauty so they spend all their time trying to undermine that regime and replace it with trash. Part of this compulsion is “blackening” White heroes and icons.

“The fascinating result of this, argue the authors, is that females are literally evolutionarily selected to accept patriarchy.” Or, don’t listen to what women say, watch what they do.

Immigration restriction — aka the National Question — is the line in the sand for our Globohomo overlords. You can say a lot, but dare to oppose the anti-White open borders agenda and deplatforming from every medium which is controlled by leftists is all but guaranteed if you aren’t protected by anonymity.

Imagine an alternate universe in which hillary clinton was the MAGA real estate mogul running against the establishment. The media would have sung her hosannas so deafeningly, praising everything from her tone to her campaign’s awesome hats to the huge crowds carrying her revolutionary spirit. Lesson: The Left is so consumed by envy of the Trump Revolution, that they will destroy it to deny its rebuke of their egos.

When the information gatekeepers are forced to accept inborn sex differences in ability, temperament, behavior, and preference, it won’t be long until inborn genetic race differences are within the sphere of acceptable discourse.

And now you know why the Diversitroids have amassed all their firepower on fledgling intrusions of realtalk: if one ugly truth slips through their Fortress Fantabulation, there’s nothing stopping all the ugly truths from overrunning the place.

Deny the biological reality of sex differences and of sex itself, and it’s easier to deny race. The Guardians of the Great Lies know that Vagina is the portal to MUH DIK.

“Bootstrap” cuckservative normies need to be mocked as vigilantly as “White male privilege” shitlibs are mocked, if not more so because the former enables the lies of the latter by ceding the rhetorical ground to the leftist template of human nature.

Redistributionism is inevitable in a multiracial society in which all groups but one vote as a bloc.

The curse of the high social status wealthy woman is that her status and money don’t by themselves attract men but they do restrict the range of men she will find attractive. She can’t buy love and she can’t feel love for any man she does buy.

The JQ life cycle:
1. enjoy their humorous chutzpah
2. notice preponderance in anti-white media
3. cut them slack because NAJALT and normie congeniality
4. learn that almost AJALT (and notable exceptions are notable for a reason)
5. quickly lose patience with their antagonistic chutzpah
6. fuck up their narrative whenever possible

The Chaimstream Media’s ethical code, such as it is, can be distilled to “Proof by assertion”.

One way the Equalist Left holds onto the reins of power in a technotopian society is by wielding the Power of Dox. Smart, talented opposition to Leftoidism will be keenly and wisely aware of the doxing threat to their livelihoods, and thus will avoid leading a credible rebellion against the media-DNC-State axis of weasel. (This is why many of the Founding Fathers initially wrote under pseudonyms.)

What happens then is that leadership posts in the alt-vacuum get filled by charlatans, attention whores, misfits, incompetents, and saboteurs who don’t fear, or astutely perceive, the threat from the Left’s Power of Dox. These sorts are better as shock troops than as leaders. The lack of qualified dissident leadership helps keep the Left Establishment unchallenged in their power.

The one upside to entrenched Leftoid Power is overreach. Count on it, and count on normies shaking off their slumber in reaction.

The “abide local norms” argument against protest in shitlib redoubts is baseless. Shitlib hotspots like college towns and giant blue megacities are filled with out-of-towners and transplants. DC is probably the most transient city in the country. These shitlibs have as little connection to the history of their adopted town or city as any outsider agitator for free speech and the American Way.

It used to be cool to be an atheist. You were a badass renegade from polite society. Not anymore. Now atheism is the smug posturing of shitlibs and their corporatocracy masters. Avowed atheists are fat neckbeards with fap chafing, regurgitating vapid sneers to an audience of fellow freaks.

The history of atheist physiognomy tells the tale.
Pre-poz atheist — brooding artist in black leather jacket.
Poz-saturated atheist — fatboy with bitch tits
Post-poz atheist — sack of amorphous lumpy flesh fed lab-grown soy pellets ordering the latest iteration of iPhag (now with pitmommy filter!)

I never thought I’d see the day when the idea of rebelling against the establishment meant holding forth giant multinational corporations, greedy fat cat oligarchs, urbanite snobs, and an all-intrusive surveillance state manned by CIA drones as paragons of moral virtue. Well done, shitlibs! You’ve betrayed every last principle you’ve claimed for yourselves, to enjoy the fleeting limbic orgasm of shitting on White people and posturing hypocritically as race-blind ignoranuses.

A White American, over his lifetime, will end up having $384K of his wealth and income transferred to a single black American. “The Cost of Black America

Moral panics usually precede major shifts in a society’s Weltanshauung and portend schisms within the reigning religion. Right now the moral panic is White supremacy, fascism, neonazism, and sexual predation by creepy anti-Chads, and the reason for the panic is that the priest class and the laity feel threatened by a coming powerful heresy. Lesson: avoid being an identifiable locus of hate and fear by heretic hunters in the grip of a moral panic.

Hypothesis: The Alt-Right and SJWism are both White Millennial movements reacting differently to the same root problem. (Personally, I think the intellectual core of the Maul-Right movement is a Gen X phenomenon, but I’m open to competing theories.)

If the Nov 2018 blue wave fails to materialize and trump republicans hold both chambers, we’ll return to the sarah jeong and Alex Jones stories as the inflection points at which the dems’ momentum stalled and reversed.

The shitlord who fired Satan’s Vessel Strzok:

Physiognomy is real.

Freedom of speech is freedom from consequences. Otherwise, speech would be made under duress, which chills the speaker and motivates him to avoid antagonizing those with the power to deliver consequences. Leftoids used to understand this, until they decided that the opposite of their former principles was beneficial to their continued rule.

A show of force and oppressive White supremacy is the only way to make the American “idea” work in shitholes.

Want a happy marriage? Have a big, cheap wedding. I kiss myself, before I preen.

There’s no such thing as old love. There is comfortable inertia.

Race mixing is the only way to equalize the races. The Left knows this, and when all their humanity-leveling plans fail, they will ramp up the race-mixing propaganda to an insufferable level. This was always going to be their end game.

Most jews, and nearly all secular mouthpiece jews, live in the modren equivalent of the shtetl — gentrified urban playgrounds filled with other jews, shitlib gentile lackeys, and token diversity — and never hear a word in anger from someone who may not toe the anti-White line. This is the condition that fuels their incredible lack of awareness.

A person would have to be borderline retarded to agree to cough up personal info to any social media company.

Privacy died a while ago, Americans are just now realizing it. There will be a backlash. Go short on the internet.

“If we import the Third World we get Third World problems.” Smart gal.

A thorough explainer about the differences between tech giants and Christian bakeries. (Shitlibs need these basic lessons hammered into their blocklike skulls.)

Nothing is not transactional. There is only crassly transparent transactionalism, and euphemistically pleasing denials of same.

Broadly, the Left is more verbal than the Right. (Rightists are more visual/spatial oriented, and less interested in abstractions than in practical concerns.) This partly explains why the Left controls message mediums. Thankfully, God gave His only begotten Shiv-son, to battle the Left and redeem the Right.

Headcase women try a lot harder in bed because they love that feeling that their man might leave them at any moment. This is why men persist in sticking it in crazy.

broke: the internet will mean the free flow of ideas!
woke: the internet has unleashed hate, it must be censored
bespoke: the internet will mean the free flow of pre-approved ideas!

A strong sense of loyalty can cut both ways: it can blind one to subversives, but once betrayed it fuels a righteous vengeance for the scalps of one’s betrayers.

Why Women Prefer Taller Men

File under: common sense confirmed by the labcoats. Height of a partner matters more to women than it does to men.

The study, “Does Height Matter? An Examination of Height Preferences in Romantic Coupling,” was conducted in two parts. Part one, which used data from the Yahoo! personal dating advertisements of 455 males (average height of 5 feet 8 inches and average age of 36 years) and 470 females (average height of 5 feet 4 inches and average age of 35 years) from throughout the U.S., found that 13.5 percent of the men wanted to date only women shorter than they are. In contrast, nearly half of the women – 48.9 percent – wanted to date only men taller than they are.

Men are more open to dating women of any height, while women are more likely to objectify men based on their height. Spread the seed, hoard the eggs, as seen through the prism of sex-based average height differences.

I wonder if shorter men have a stronger preference than do taller men for women shorter than themselves, partly because most men like looking down at a woman (it feeds the male need to feel like he is protective and dominant) and partly because shorter men especially intuit that relationships are stabler (and the paternity more assured) if the woman is shorter than the man.

The really interesting discovery from this study is that it answers why women prefer taller men than themselves. Short version (heh): women want to feel dominated by a man.

According to the study data, the dominant reasons females cited for preferring a tall partner are matters of protection and femininity.

“As the girl, I like to feel delicate and secure at the same time,” said a woman in the study who is 5 feet 3 inches tall. “Something just feels weird in thinking about looking ‘down’ into my man’s eyes.”

Women feel protected and more feminine when they are with a masculine, physically imposing man. Likewise, men feel protective and more masculine when they are with a feminine, physically vulnerable woman. Sexual polarity ftw. (The Leftoid Fuggernaut wept)

Men, for their part, are much more practical about the considerations of a woman’s height,

Men were much less likely to say that height mattered, and for those that did, they preferred shorter women, but not so short that it would cause problems with physical intimacy.

“I like it when the body of your partner fits yours,” said another study participant, a male who is 5 feet 11 inches tall. “It also makes it easier to kiss, hold hands and do other activities with your partner.”

The wheelbarrow.

From the study’s lead poopytalk squid inker,

George Yancey, a professor of sociology at the University of North Texas and the study’s lead author, believes that the height preferences of men and women can be explained by traditional societal expectations and gender stereotypes.

Nope. Societal expectations got nothin’ to do with it. It’s biologically evolved predispositions all the way down.

Decades of radical feminism and cultural conditioning at odds with the notion of a functioning patriarchy have done nothing to diminish women’s preference for taller men. Atavator writes,

It’s common sense until they lapse into the usual social-constructivist genuflection at the end. Do social scientists realize how they undermine their own credibility with this crap?

Most do, but they’re cowards who’d rather keep their sinecures than their integrity.

Another thing they didn’t think through: how are such perceptions and preferences affected by species-constant (or at least race-constant) proportions and emotions? By that I mean this: *I* never wanted to be with a woman taller than myself, but then, I’m 6’1″.

How many women over 6’1″ fit within biologically-conditioned boundaries of “attractive”? A much smaller proportion than those who are 5’4″, I’d venture to guess!

Shorter/smaller people across the world live longer than taller/bigger people, which may explain why there hasn’t been an evolutionary arms race toward ever-taller humans. That aside, it is a little bit of a mystery why very short men still exist in Western populations when they take a big hit to their reproductive fitness. It could be that there are enough even shorter women to satisfy the short men.

Heather adds,

I don’t like a guy who is too skinny either. I don’t like feeling like I could knock him over accidentally.

Women are averse to being with men who are mentally, physically, emotionally, or psychologically feebler than themselves. While there are exceptions, generally I’ve found that slightly overweight men do better than underweight men do with women. Gross obesity is another story, so don’t think you can grow out a dick-concealing gut and expect the ladies to swoon. (OTOH, if your dick is big enough to be seen jutting out from a giant beer gut, then the ladies might come up with some creative euphemisms to describe the appeal of your belly.)

PS Shorter men shouldn’t despair. The best PUA I’ve known was in the ballpark of 5’5″. But he was confident, smooth, and fearless, and those traits were enough to compensate for his shortness. He often went home with women taller than himself. Shortness is a strike against a man, but it’s not an SMV-killing death blow. Even if a short man has no Game, he can substantially improve his odds simply by targeting shorter women (or, not uncommonly, taller women who would be more impressed by a show of self-entitled confidence from a short man than from a tall man (from whom it would be expected)).

From a 1963 porno mag:

The cock carousel has a rich Crimson Pill history.

The seeds of America’s decline were already evident in the sexual abandon of women unleashed by mid-20th Century. What we’re dealing with now is a post-patriarchal culture set in motion many decades ago.

As with all post-patriarchal cultures, demise is guaranteed because abandoning benevolent patriarchy violates fundamental sexual polarity rules which govern relational dynamics between the sexes.

As a reader put it, “Men adapt to nature. Women adapt to man.”

A worthy COTW winning entry from Jax,

When someone states that “America has no identity” you have to accept you are talking to an ignorant know nothing or conniving jackal. When they say “America is not a nation it’s an idea” you have to accept they are also an idiot and treat them accordingly. Just look at how exporting that “idea” has worked out abroad.

America had an identity. The world knew what an American looked like, sounded like, and even acted like. We had our own culture and lifestyle that was unique to us and both the envy and contempt of our cousins in Europe. Americans were loud, brash, adventurous, and bold. We as a society were conquerors and builders; as a people fearless and courageous. We were given nicknames like “Yankee” and “Gringo,” testaments to that identity Ted and his ilk says doesn’t exist.

Yes, Americans were also defined by their race because the country was in fact mostly white. Do you think over the course of history any foreign people would disagree with that Mr. Lieu?

This Ted Lieu creature knows he spews venomous anti-American poison. He spews it because in his heart he knows he isn’t American and will never be American because he doesn’t meet the definition as defined by precedence. This is why he attacks Laura Ingraham, because he knows she IS an American and in order to redefine “American” so he can be included (and his third world followers) he must conquer and subjugate Laura and her American brethren. Laura’s only crime is that she would dare to stop it.

America, was a collection of all of Europa. The culmination of the adventurous and ambitious diaspora in Europe manifested across the sea as a new distinct people that was forged from the identities of all of Europe. Everyone knew when they had encountered an American, we left a distinct impression wherever we went. That impression was a testament to our identity. And yes, it was real.

America *had* an identity. What is her identity now? A world market bazaar for the barter of goods, services, and virtue signaling. That’s not an identity anyone would cherish, let alone fight to protect.

Make America Great Again implicitly means giving back an identity to America, one that was stolen from her by rapacious Globohomoists. And identity is inextricable from race; recovering American identity necessarily means recovering America’s predominant Whiteness.

An excellent follow-up comment from Moses,

Long time Asia expat here. Asians are unable to separate race from nationality. “Chinese” are, well, Chinese. Japanese, Japanese. Etc.

To Asians, “American” means “White.” Really.

Asian Americans come over here and try to get jobs at English schools, only to be told that Asian parents prefer White faces (even non-native English speakers) teaching English to their children. Then Asian Americans seethe in anger. Their heads explode, and they find a way to blame and hate Whites even more.

Another funny bit.

Remember when Obama appointed former WA governor Gary Locke, Chinese American, as US Ambassador to China? I guess the geniuses in the Obummer administration thought that would help smooth relations with the Chinese, appointing an ethnic Chinese to the post.

Huge mistake. The Chinese hated Locke.

They could never understand how “one of their own” could represent American interests over Chinese. They hated him. To them, he was the worst kind of race traitor.

Are you getting it yet?

Deep down, Ted Lieu is Chinese. And he KNOWS IT.

This whole “America is only an idea, not a people” thing was thought up and pushed by Fellow Whites. Non-Whites have picked it up like a cudgel against Heritage America.

“Idea America” as a cudgel wielded in eliminationist rage against Identity America is a powerful visual.

As vfm#7634 writes,

That’s funny. The East Asians see Asian U.S. citizens as Fake Americans.

Because they are.

Fake News, Fake Americans. The Left is in revolt against Trump because he exposes their fakery, and strikes at the deepest need of Leftists: their unfulfilled quest for authenticity. It’s why the Left has to so heavily lean on equalist boilerplate…they have nothing organic with which to identify.

Teach Your Sons Well…

A large, muscular black man in a dress and bright pink lipstick asked a middle-aged White lady to hold a door open for him. Onlookers who numbered about fifteen or twenty gawked for a split second, then promptly switched to feigning impassive nonchalance.

The side show freak quality of this vignette was most pronounced in the reaction of the self-policing crowd. The Emperor has clothes…it’s a dress hiding a sausage, worn by a creature barking at the plebs in a lispy growl through neon natgeo lips…and we’re all supposed to act as if this is the most normal and natural thing in the world.

Is it humiliation if it’s self-induced?

%d bloggers like this: