Online Disqualification Game

Disqualification Game is feigning active disinterest in a girl. It is acting as if you are preemptively removing yourself as a prospect. DQ Game can also refer to disqualifying the girl (rather than yourself) as a suitable mate choice. It’s a script-flipping tactic which has the purpose of shifting relative SMV-dynamic perceptions so that the girl feels like she is chasing the man than the usual and expected way these things go.

An emailer passes along a very terse and very funny example of subversive online DQ Game,

Online dating profile:

“Love to hear you drone on endlessly about your tattoos. Also, please be pre-diabetic. Women with mulatto child to the front of the line.”

Ironically, there was a lot more character diversity in movies back when America was predominately White.

I love that emailer’s DQ Game tailored for the online experience. It grips the female imagination (which is symbiotically attached to the female indignation) and it’s funny. It will get noticed, and that’s rule number one in online game. Naturally, most tattooed, pre-diabetic, mudsharks with mystery meatballs in tow reading that sarcastic profile will recuse themselves from contention, which is an upside alone worth the effort if this sort of profile didn’t also attract the interest of debt-free virgins without tattoos. Implied in the bantz is the prerequisite that cute girls need not apply. The cute girl will giggle and wonder about the man who can be so confidently callous and discriminating. Chicks dig a man of wealth and taste.

Lunchpail Game

The point of peacocking is to provoke a reaction of interest and curiosity in girls, which then provides you opportunity to display grace under pressure and amused mastery when the inevitable alpha-sifting probing questions and shit tests come flying. Peacocking is therefore an extension of or supplement to a man’s physical and social presence, serving a similar function as a square jaw, social status, and charisma.

Peacocking doesn’t necessarily mean flashy clothes. Any unique accessory can act as an electric zapper to bugwomen. For instance, this is Mutant Seven’s lunchpail Game:

I used to carry the coolest lunchpail on the block when I was a kid…

I still do…

Oh sure, some hall monitor shrews will object. These are the shrews you wouldn’t have fucked anyway.

Birth Order Banging

Welcome to the CH patented, leather-bound B.O.B. seduction system.

Birth order has an impact on a girl’s character. How much of an impact is debatable, but the zero sum sexual market is all about exploiting pattern perturbations at the margins. In my travels through the Valley of the Thots, I’ve noticed that only-children, first-borns, middle chicks, and “woopsie” last-borns share personality, and hence sexuality, traits.

Only-children girls:

The stereotypes are true. Only-daughters have been coddled their whole lives. They have never had to compete for love and attention with siblings, and their parents (probably sad they didn’t have a son, given they stopped at one kid) treat them with kid gloves because they don’t want the onlies to be upset with them. Sometimes the fathers will resent their only-girls, or push them to be tomboys against their natures, and this will later fuel a slutty rebelliousness in the only-girl that materializes as Dad’s worst nightmare. These girls grow up to be your typical “precious princesses”; selfish, egotistic, demanding, irrationally confident…and DTF. Yes, onlies love to jump in the sack with men who can overpower their solipsism and associated shit tests. The catch is that onlies make such an overpowering first impression that most men are intimidated by their lookatme antics.

First-born girls:

The weight of expectation is placed on these girls. They have carried the burden of pleasing their parents and undertaking some responsibility for their younger siblings. These are your straight-arrow, apple polisher chicks with a good head on their shoulders. They know what they want in a man, and it’s usually a long-term commitment. First-borns respond well to “shared values” and “life dreams (or lost dreams)” Game routines, because they have spent their lives trying to please others often at the expense of pleasing themselves. You want to be the man who can connect with the first-born on the level of someone who gets what she’s had to sacrifice, and who can give her what she’s allowed herself to miss out on before she met you.

Middle chicks:

Keep in mind that White American family size is decreasing, so middle- and last-born chicks are a vanishing breed. Still, I’ve known a few, and they have their own way of seeing the world. Middles are usually artsy, free spirits, and this predilection extends to their poon. They have big, soft hearts, easily broken, that soar and sway and get carried away on bouts of self-induced drama. These were the girls largely ignored by their parents, left to explore on their own. And explore they do, every nook and cocka. Be the man who notices her “special talents” and she’ll be yours forever.

Woopsies (last-borns):

“Mistakes” are pampered even more than are only-children, especially if they’re girls. These are the “rare jewel” daughters of fathers who shower them with baubles, credit cards, BMWs for their Sweet Sixteen birthdays, and a hands-off approach to disciplining them. Part of the reason is that parents get lazy by the third kid, opting to let nature take its course. Another reason is that parents, feeling guilty about neglecting to properly raise the Woopsie, alleviate their guilt by giving the Woopsie lots of gifts and leeway to do as she pleases. The woopsie girl can do no wrong, and because she has never had boundaries on her behavior, she grows up into a thrill-seeker who will push men’s boundaries just to see how much she can get away with before the hammer comes down (it rarely does…most men are pussies). The Woopsie is liable to shack up with a jerkboy grifter before she ever has a serious relationship with a serious man. She’s prone to cheating, carousing, gallivanting, acting out, and then regretting her decisions when the Wall looms. Men looking for the Woopsie Bang should stress script-flipping; the Woopsie can’t resist a hard-to-get man after a lifetime having her feelings validated and her every want fulfilled by her Pedestal Polishing Dad.

***

“traitors first” connects the dots,

So essentially go for onlies and woopsies for the easy lay and first and middles for LTR or waifu.
Wow that really does explain why the female market is so screwed up, you’re picking from 70% + onlies and woopsies (probably closer to 90% now a days) leaving less than 30% (way less) as potential wife material and probably half of that left over is probably a lost cause.

There is much truth in this.

Small family size = More dirty sluts?

mmmmmm….could be!

The White Men Alliance

White men driven by a shared purpose, cooperating to defeat an enemy, are the most formidable force in the known universe.

But first, they have to overcome petty intra-ethnic divisions. Thankfully, the Democortez Party is doing that job for us; White male Dems are a breed being pushed off their habitat by invasive species.

Audacious E not-so-subtly hints that we MAGAmen can hasten the process by trolling the Diversitroid Fuggernaut into more quickly and permanently casting out the White men in their ranks (and thus depriving the Dems of critical leadership skills).

The Perfidious Mick Joe Crowleys of the USA may never come over to the MAGA side after their ousting from the Dems, but if we can successfully encourage their silencing and ostracism from Democortez politics, then we will have amplified the voice of the White MAGAmen on the other side who can save America from the abyss of virtue spiraling cat lady suicide.

The Rewards Of MAGA Shitlordery

Matteo Salvini, Italy’s Trump, with his fiancée Elisa Isoardi,

Salvini is no Brad Pitt, which goes to show how far a little ZFG attitude and shitlord street cred can take a man.

Freelance Comment Of The Week: Swipe Debt

From RooshV,

Have you heard that Tinder is now offering you a ’24 hour’ boost for $70? Many countries have prostitutes that are cheaper than that!

And the prostitutes won’t renege on their end of the deal.

Our Credentialed White Woman Problem

"College-educated Republican women are extinct" https://t.co/ay7eoCyJBU pic.twitter.com/LBRftr15V3

— Virginia Postrel (@vpostrel) August 2, 2018

#RepealThe19th

This is what runaway credentialism does to our naturally suck-up White women: turns them into Gay Mulatto adoring, poz-pushing, miscegenating White man-haters willing to trash their nation and turn it into a gibs depot for the world’s filth just to get a virtue sniveling tingle in their cooches.

Thankfully, this mental illness is largely confined to over-credentialed White women (I wish this data had been further broken down by marital status). If Trump is to keep winning, he needs a message that appeals to working class women as well as to men. The credentialed battlecunt vote is lost to him; best we can do on Trumperica’s behalf is mock these cat ladies in waiting, shame them for their vapid beliefs, and ridicule their sanctimony. Women do feel the hot burn of shame far more powerfully than do men; a shaming campaign can pay big dividends.

Why do credentialed White broads hate Trump? An MPCer thinks media capture is primarily to blame.

This is the media capture effect.  100% of mainstream political media is anti-Trump, and it hits women hardest.

College educated women listen to NPR and read the NYT.  If they’re Republican-leaning they may possibly watch Fox News instead of CNN, but more likely neither.  Even the Republican-leaning women still listen to NPR.  The Anti-Trump message on all of this media is that supporting Trump is not even something that needs to be rationally considered.  Only damaged people like Trump.

This tells on normal women.  Plenty of these women would like to support Trump and not vote to sell out their country, but they need social cover for it.  There need to be more normal women on TV and the media talking about the bread and butter reasons to support Trump.  Jobs, the economy, and protecting what we’ve got from foreign competition are all things to emphasize.  Some way, some how, we have to get images of normal women supporting Trump onto the television.

Also, while banging hot women on the side may have helped JFK/Clinton with the average single unmarried Democrat woman, it doesn’t help Trump so much with the average married Republican woman.

Credentialed White Women (CWW) need to be weaned off the Talmudvision. Ripples in their comfortable conformism can eventually effect sea changes in attitude. For instance, ask a CWW at your local airport to remove CNN from the TVs; tell her you don’t want to hear “Fake News”. If she objects, laugh in her face and snort “typical”.

Media capture includes social expectation bias. Some, maybe 5 or 10%, of these CWWs telling survey takers they are voting Democreep are lying to avoid social ostracism from the spinsterhood. I doubt that explains all of the trend, though.

A more potent explanation is that CWWs have come to despise their available White men. These cunts are surrounded on their college campuses by squadrons of soyboys. They resent these un-men and transfer their resentment onto Trump and the shitlord men who support him.

Some of (((their))) resentment is aimed at married White women and popular “Beckys” (a generic term for a psychologically and physically attractive White woman who supports Trump and loves masculine men).

Adding fuel to the CWW rush to anti-Trump and anti-White conformism is the fact that US colleges have become far less discriminatory over the last two decades. Admissions standards have been lowered to accommodate Diversity™ and incoming hordes of White women who want to major in Gender Fluidity and Whorenalism. Colleges are 60+% female, and the sex skew is getting worse, stoking a bitterness in female students who want to nuptially land an educated Chad but find they have to compete with prettier girls just to get a one night stand. Romantic frustration is another culprit pushing CWWs away from sanity and toward Globohomoism.

Which leads to a point I’ve made many times on this blog: when women remain unmarried but economically self-sufficient, they vote for anyone who will strengthen the power of Sugar Daddy Government at the expense of White beta male providers. Government becomes not only a beta provider substitute, but also an outlet for CWWs to vent their spite and signal their loyalty to the gynarcho-tyranny.

The loss of the early-wedded homemaker, in both numbers and status, has created a perverse economic incentive for the CWW who wants cheap consumer products and indentured servants to release her from labor-intensive routine household chores and child-rearing that used to fill a big part of the day of un-credentialed White women, before the DEGREE UP AND LEAN IN, YASS QUEENS ideology took a hold of their imaginations. Throwing more government money at these CWWs isn’t going to solve the problem of them aligning with Globohomo; in the long term it will only intensify their disloyalty to their White men.

The CWW problem isn’t fixed until women have “skin in the game” again. Women have to feel like they are in this together with their men, and that any President and any policies which benefit their men also benefits the women. This means a return to the benevolent patriarchy of America at her height, when sex roles and sex differences were celebrated instead of bitterly cursed like they are today.