Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Quoted in full:

lzloozozozozozozoz

da GBFM at your serviceesz lzozozozo!!

“I’ve been seeing this girl for a year. We live together and I’ve still got hand.”

OMG lzozzlzll wtf are fuckity fucks doing with chix in your homes? lzozlzlzlz omg lozlzlzlzlzl looozers lzozlzlzlz1!! hzhzh

THEY VIOLATE THE ONE COCK RULE THEY ARE OUT! OUT!

OUT!

O U T OUT! lzozlzlzl

OMG lozlzlzozlozozolzl wft r u doing dating a chick 4 a yer did your dick fall off? Were yu chosen by Beernanke and given an award and medal to support today’s slutty slutt vampiressses cuckholders cockcutters?

sounds 2 me it is the latter as u have no cock lzozlzlzlzl lzzozl

and she made you think of another cock

fucktard haven’t u heard of the one cock rule?

let’s teach these douches somethin ’bout nbein a man yo!

throw a beat over this way.
yo yo yo yo
yo yo yo

now hit it!

one cock rule one cock rule
i ain’t no beta fool i ain’t no beta tool
about another cock ya make me think
i’m gone, yo bitch,
let the betas buy yas yer next drink

one cock rule one cock rule
i ain’t no beats fool i ain’t no beta tool
over vampires and werewolfe you ginas all drool
letting their cocks touch your deep down stool
then you blame the betas in school
and transfer wealth for the bernanke gene pool
jonah goldberg sends our alphas 2 die on foreign shores
stuffing his face with dc pizza as they die in fiat wars
neocon womenz repeating butthexers lies in their mags
even after menopause and no need for da ragz
telling young chickas to lust after vampires
as they build their fiat empires

one cock rule one cock rule
i ain’t no fool i ain’t no tool
about another cock ya make me think
i’m gone, yo bitch,
let the betas buy yas yer next drink

let the betas pay to raise your bastard kids
let the betas sign teh fiat masters marriage contracts
theft in fiat inflation is hid
as they swing their bankrupting axe
i don’t care what last night u did,
ever since i kicked ya gina out, i been relaxed.

as they promote butthex across the land
ripping out fetuses from parenthood planned
as fathers form teh homes the neocons ban
the atalnatic authoresses just don’t undertsand

but when chix wakes up and her butt is sore
it’s not my fault no–it’s cause she’s a whore
as the fiat masters desoul women with butthex cock
teach them to transfer wealth with pre-teen strumpet rock

one cock rule one cock rule
i ain’t no fool i ain’t no tool
about another cock ya make me think
i’m gone, yo bitch,
let the betas buy yas yer next drink

womenz womenz bernanke took advanatge of you
you wasted your best years on vampires and werewolves
and now you cry your tears cause of your sore anus
stamp your little feet saying, “you betas must pay for this!!!”

and aging neocon women promoting butthexing vampires
teacxhing women to lust after the undead
as the neocons suck the western world dry
bankrupting it all,m enlsaving it debt
while selfish womenz at the atalnatic monthly
cry cry cry
cry cry cry
not for you or me
but for themselves
not for the 50,000,000 aborted souls
but for their dried up ginas and sore assholes
so many chances they had to marry a nice guy
but he left her dry
so whe butthexed with the asshole
and now see her cry
and wonder why
and transofrm the entire univeristy
into a program to further the fiat lie
to transfer wealth and wage war and death
to about fifty million more
and redefine fifty cocks in her ass as empowered
and not a whore

all together now!

lzozllzzl lozlzlz zlozozoz
lozlzl lzozozlz ozlzooz zlo9oo
lozlzlz ozlzoozl ozlzlzoz lzozlz zlzoz zlzozzlozlzozlo

one cock rule one cock rule
i ain’t no fool i ain’t no tool
about another cock ya make me think
i’m gone, yo bitch,
let the betas buy yas yer next drink
alreayd seen yer pink stink
bent ya over the sink

and howscomes the bankers southpark never does satarize
because everything is fair game–truth love honor–excpet for fiat butthexing lies.

all together now!

lzozllzzl lozlzlz zlozozoz
lozlzl lzozozlz ozlzooz zlo9oo
lozlzlz ozlzoozl ozlzlzoz lzozlz zlzoz zlzozzlozlzozlo

AND THREE COCK RULE:

^^^^ to the 24 for or so tardbetadouches who voted my “one cock rule” rap down

lozlzlzlzlozzllzlzlzlz

what do ya want?

a two cock rule rap?

or three cock rule?

three cock rule, three cock rule,
i’m a beta herb my own cock won’t do
i need a chick to cuckold me
i need a chick on me to pee
three cock rule, three cock rule,
i love being the greater fool
one cock in her mouth, one in her anus,
i keep mine in my pants,
and pay her bills and rent and fare for da bus.
so she can club and grind, on denim cocks dance.
three cock rule, three cock rule,
i treat my lady like a nice guy,
give her chivarly while with 2 others she doth lie,
three cock rule, three cock rule,
while your cock doth touch her stool,
i play videogames @ home in my single mom’s basement,
as teh fed fianance feminsits studies @ school,
teaching her to love and bail out the butthexers,
to persucte me 4 letting her live 4 free,
while she tickles drummer/druggie cock until it goes
splooge splooge splooge! tee hee tee hee!
three cock rule, three cock rule,
i’m the beta herb, teh cuckholded fool,
i respect her, keep my cock in my pants,
fund her with other cocks to dance.

lozlzlzlzl

or would u betaherbs prefer a five cock rule rap! omg i bet someofya would like dat! lzozl

lzozozozo

A Gabber prompts the title of this post with the following thought experiment,

It is also more important to control women’s sexuality than men’s sexuality.

Hypothetical;
A tribe of 100 men and 100 women.
You control the sexuality of 99 men and 1 woman? You get 99 single mothers.
You control the sexuality of 1 man and and 99 women? You get 1 single mother.

A perfectly illustrative hypothetical. About the only edit I would make is to account for female hypergamy: in the second scenario, the one unconstrained woman would choose the apex alpha (if her appearance was sufficiently arousing to allow her the choice) and ignore the remaining 98 men granted freedom of sexuality. You’d still get a single mom, though, because that apex alpha would be set upon by the 98 blue-balled betas who would kill him (if they didn’t also kill her infant in the way usurping lions are wont to do).

This is why White Knights are so fucking stupid to attempt their pedestal polishing within the context of a society that has removed all constraints on female sexuality (while retaining shame-based restrictions on male sexuality). These goobers practiced in the brute art of thot enabling are unwittingly abetting and exacerbating social dysfunction and atomized sexual market transactionalism.

It’s not a coincidence that the single mommery rate rose to heights previously unimagined in America at the same time the abolishment of social controls on women released free ranging vagina on the land.

It’s unturtling gashes all the way down.

plumpjack rightfully earns this week’s COTW with the following gem,

women fainting. you may have seen it in old movies. plumpjack is here to tell you that it’s real, friends.

last Friday I was with a girl I’ve been seeing for about a month. she’s a good girl, very cute, scots-irish brunette, early thirties, sporty gogrrl (mild version – my type), stage 3 poz, but pimp hand-treatable. definitely buns => oven material, which is what I’m on the hunt for.

as we’ve gotten closer to getting “serious” she started ratcheting up the casual references to past flings. on Friday when she hit the fourth time that day and it was time for some patriarchy/pimp hand application.

we were standing in my kitchen and my vibe went from fun and friendly to deadly serious. I said, “what do you think happens to my attraction to you every time you bring up a guy you fucked?”

she meekly replied, “it goes down”.

I continued, looking severely into her eyes, “that’s right. it goes WAY down. you’d think that if you were lucky enough to have a serious guy interested in you, a guy who has his shit together and can basically have any woman he wants, that you would want to show him that you’re worth investing in. but that’s not what you’re doing. you’re sending me messages that I can’t take you seriously, that you’re a joke. that you’re body is a joke. your life is a big joke. that you’ll give yourself away cheaply, to any guy who wants you. why would I invest in a woman like that? now, I’d like to think you’re a better woman than that, and that I CAN take you seriously, but this shit of you bringing up guys you’ve dated as if it’s something to brag about needs to stop.”

as I’m saying this she starts leaning on the kitchen counters. she’s struggling to hold herself up. I’m noticing this but I plow onward. it was a “shape up or GTFO moment”. so she struggles to stand up for a few more seconds and then she just collapses. out. fucking. cold. I caught her before she hit the floor and dragged her over to the couch. not kidding. (now I know what “dead weight” ACTUALLY means).

so I lay her down on the couch and I’m, like, wtf happened?!? I’ve never seen anyone faint before. I was trying to shake her out of it and was literally ten seconds away from calling 911 when slowly she started to come back. totally fine. wildest shit I’ve ever seen.

she got the message.

funniest thing about this is that this sporty lil girl (who I actually really like) is a rock climber, boot camp instructor, yoga instructor, artist, blah blah blah…. all the “I’m a cool/tough chick!” credentials, and she f’ing fainted the first time a guy ever went full patriarchy on her. blew my mind. how many more are out there begging to be overpowered in this way?

I talked to an older friend about this and he said it was quite common knowledge in the old days that women fainting was a thing and you would still see it in the movies even into the 70s. well, it’s real. and it’s powerful. seriously it’s like some kind of magic spell. you won’t believe it until you see it.

You know what chicks secretly dig? THE FULL PATRIARCHY. No apologies.

(i’ve driven women to tear-streaked hysterics with intimations of abandonment, but the only quasi-fainting thot I’ve had the pleasure to watch crumble in a heap on the floor was the one who came so hard under my meaty duress that her knees buckled and she slid down into the fetal position, which makes a certain amount of conceptional sense as a concentric fetus meme.)

***

COTW runner-up winner is Anonymous (capitalized for distinctiveness),

Great story plumpjack. I’ve encountered similar situations in which women deny how they are valued. I was walking home with my ex once and she was talking about the harpies that she works at the office with. Something about how they went to a wedding and none of them went to grab the bride’s flower toss. My ears perked up. I asked her to clarify. “Oh, they don’t want to settle down or get married yet at all.” I replied “They know how old they are, right?” “Yeah, but they still want to get out in the world” “And you listen to them? You’re like that?” “Well…..I mean I’d like to get married but I still want to see the world and… (all I heard was TV static at this point)” I planted my eyes forward on our walk, tilted my head back and increased my pace and swagger *just* a little. “Yeah, I don’t think I could settle down with you yet either. There’s so many different women to try. I want a couple more redheads.” She gave me a look of total shock before matching my pace and trying to grab my hand back (and my attention). I should have detoured into the nearest bar.

Why would The Manipulated Woman exist when we already have The Self-Deluded Woman?

FYI playing into this predilection of women for self-delusion by Agreeing & Amplifying & Co-opting their un-moored nonsense is a fantastically effective Game tactic.

The Fuggernaut doesn’t have an “off” button. It was never gonna stop at [the Pill] [legal abortion] [free condoms] [buttplug usage seminars] [rapefugee welcoming], and go no further.

Turning back the clock by force is the inevitable conclusion to this tragic, predictable story.

ps if this is a troll, my hat is off to the person or group taking the fight to shitlibville, and opening normie eyes to the eventual dystopia shitlibs want for the rest of the country.

From a commenter,

Amazon opens one of the warehouses, usually in a suburban area. Hire local folks, work them in slave labor conditions with quotas so tough that few can meet them. Once they cycle through a couple of turnovers, they claim they can’t get labor locally and then they can get Visa workers dirt cheap on government programs.

They’ve done this repeatedly.

Nailed it. Isn’t Amazonia currently scouting locations for its HQ2 Sperg Dome? Short-list precincts will doubtlessly throw tax incentives at Robber Baron Bezos and sell out their communities and their country for dat sweet, sweet slave labor camp tax base, adding to the local real estate churn as ever more shitlib White families flee for Whiter areas and pay three or four times the median home price for the privilege of allowing themselves to be priced out of their homeland.

It’s as if all of Late Stage America has taken on the high time preference of blacks.

PS President Trump, I know you’re reading, so pay close attention to the following:

TRUST BUST AMAZON

Sex skews can have profound impacts on sexual market behavior. The scarcer sex gets to dictate the terms of engagement. Generally, more women than men means more cads and tramps, fewer dads and damsels. While more men than women means this:

Western societies, particularly in America, have currently operative sexual markets which strongly indicate sex skews that favor women: dull-looking egomaniacal attention whores holding out for apex alphas. Western Men are noticing. From farmlegend,

CH: “But the hourglass-shaped, slender, feminine woman is a vanishing breed, and fat chicks are so disgusting that men will bang a strident, chisel-jawed, hipless careercunt with 3% body fat because the alternative — spelunking neck deep into the smegma swamp of a quintuple-folded labia-rinth — is so ghastly.”

Couple things –
In my day, “curvy” meant Sophia Loren, Racquel Welch. In 2018 America, any overfed warpig with a beer gut, flabby batwings and pendulous tits can proudly call herself “curvy” and no one bats an eye.

Another thing about the America of my yute – a plain-faced, hipless, titless gal was practically invisible in the SMP, and would have considered herself fortunate to snag a dull, hardworking average dude for marriage and babymaking. The obesity epidemic has radically transformed the social value of these types of women, and they can and do get away with behaving like entitled queens near the apex of the pyramid. I personally know of a few women in my orbit of acquaintances that fit this description, and the amount of attention they get from the ravenous horde of thirsty men is unreal – they get approached all the damned time, shit test and flake like it’s goin’ out of style, and sneer at the effrontery of men that show her interest who aren’t 6’3” and studly.

I’ve written about this topic before: female obesity has a huge impact on the practicable sexual market:

there is another, MASSIVE factor at work skewing the sexual market, and one that, just as unsurprisingly, gets almost no attention from the PC-soaked punditariat: female obesity.

Imagine you are an unmarried working class dude recently unemployed. You look around you and marvel at a sea of grotesquely misshapen fat women, rolls upon rolls of undulating flesh hiding stores of cheesy poofs, porky hellion spawn trailing their wakes, chins resting atop chins, bloated diabetic cankles stomping the Walmartian grounds like lumbering elephants. In some towns, close to 40% of the available single women are clinically OBESE.

This is obesity folks, not just overweight. Overweight women are physically repulsive, but obesity renders them monstrous. To clarify this assertion for the modern indoctrinated female reader: an obese woman is as sexually undesirable to men as a jobless, charmless, humorless, enfeebled, dull man is sexually undesirable to women.

So back to our realistic scenario: Our typical unmarried working class man surveys his cellulite-blasted kingdom (and it does not matter how fat he, himself, is, for fat men and thin men alike prefer the exquisite sight of slender female bodies), and he makes a quick hindbrain calculation. Does he bust his ass in a crappy service sector job doing women’s work for a shot at legally bound long-term commitment to a shuffling shoggoth dragging the bastard spawn of a hundred alpha males in tow, or does he say “fuck it” and turn to video games and porn featuring hot, thin chicks for his status and dopamine fix?

Sex skew doesn’t necessarily have to be purely birth-ratio numerical in character; a functional sex skew can exist anywhere the BANGABLE population of one sex outnumbers the bangable population of the other sex. Given the inherent nature of the sexes — expensive eggs, cheap sperm, female perishability, male expendability — there will under normal circumstances and in most places and times be fewer bangable women than bangable men, but additional, novel factors can push that ingrained female-favored skew closer or further from favoring women.

Gross, boundless obesity — an evolutionary novel factor if ever there was one — negatively affects female bangability more than it does male bangability, so a high rate of female obesity would in practice reduce further the number of bangable women available to men, creating a “dads and damsels” sexual market of fewer women and more men that mirrors a numerically shifted sexual market in which male live births greatly outnumbered female live births. The tilted playing field would tilt even more against men, from all the fat women standing at one end of it.

In short, widespread (heh) female obesity means women can call the shots, and the less-fat the woman, the more shots she can call and the louder and more obnoxious her calls. Sex-skewing obesity has a downstream effect on the sexual market that influences the decision-making process of every woman, slender and larded alike, so that even the plain janes and the bangable-by-black-man-standards chubsters strut and preen like the past HB8s of a better, thinner America. Meanwhile, a present day HB8 has so many options and love-parched lickspittles fanning her with online flattery that she leverages her power to convince an alpha male to accept exclusivity and nagging before he’s ready (if she’s forward-thinking), or she squanders her prime lubricity years on the cock carousel laboring under the well-fed delusion that she has all the time in the world and a limitless, uninterrupted menu of alpha males eager to save a ho and pay through the nose for the privilege of it.

The picture is complicated (for the worse) by the fact that “dads and damsels” aren’t the sole manifestations of a female obesity-skewed sex market that favors women. Scarce slender pussy can just as easily mean more men dropping out of the dating market rather than “dadding up”, especially if conditions in the dating field are such that actively or attitudinally chaste, pleasantly feminine damsels remain in short supply, which as anyone looking at Current Year Cuntery can readily ascertain they are. And “dropping out” becomes a lot more tolerable to men if they have the horniness release valve of hardcore online porn, to be supplemented (very soon) with lifelike HB10 sexbots.

None of this state of affairs, btw, is conducive to maintaining, let alone building, civilization. But we won’t learn this lesson until it’s too late. It is required.

Solve the female obesity pandemic and you solve countless associated ailments suppressing the innate greatness of European Christendom.

LOSE A FUPA, SAVE OUR FUTURE
GOODBYE MUFFINTOP, AMERICA’S BACK ON TOP

Chalk up another loss for the “divorce experts” (aka the “man-hating feminist cunts, phaggy white knight enablers, demagogic politicians, and greedy lawyers”): the financial impact of divorce hits men hardest.

The Australian Institute of Family Studies has found divorced people aged over 55 had less disposable income and fewer assets than their married counterparts.

The study also said men end up worse off, but this is in contrast to the views of divorce experts, who say older women are the ones who are missing out financially. […]

The study examined the financial consequences of divorce for up to 3,000 older Australians between 2001 and 2016, using data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics Surveys.

It found that during this period, there had been a 10 per cent increase in divorce.

The research also found that men were slightly [ed: “slightly”? see below] worse off than women when it came to household disposable income.

Click on the direct link to the study for actual numbers on how men are getting ass-raped by the divorce industrial complex:

Australian Institute of Family Studies Director, Anne Hollonds said the study focused on people who had divorced on average 15 to 20 years ago and found their finances remained in a weaker position than their married counterparts.

“Our analysis shows that divorced men and women have less household disposable income than their married counterparts at this later stage in life. On average divorced single men were $10,000 worse off and divorced single women were $6,300 worse off over the 16 years,” she said.

This is in Australia, an Anglosphere nation as overrun with man-hating feminist idiocy as any Inner Hajnalian formerly all-White nation, so you can assume the same study in the US would have similar results.

The study doesn’t speculate why divorced men are financially harmed worse than are divorced women, but I can offer a few guesses why:

  1. there is more institutional discrimination against older men in the job market than exists for older women seeking work
  2. divorced men (have to) spend more of their own money to attract a new lover, whereas divorced women can leverage their cooking skills and holes to gain access to a new man’s money
  3. divorce on the whole redistributes money from men to women
  4. alimony and child support costs fall largely on divorced men

What’s funny is that a raft of studies show that men are financially more responsible than are women, so the “divorce gap” in household disposable income that favors women could conceivably be a lot smaller or even reversed if divorced women didn’t have the option (mostly unavailable to divorced men) to cajole new lovers to pick up the tab.

***

From very occasional poster,

My ex gets 30% of my military retirement until I die (her lawyer screwed up twice–she was eligible for 34% and he didn’t even ask for SBP until it was way too late and he was legally not allowed to). She $2,000 a month in alimony for the first four years after the divorce, so she got over $3,200 a month free and clear. Yet she somehow managed to run up $80,000 in debt in the first year after we divorced.

Wait, the children lived with me. After a few years she was up to $30,000 behind in unpaid child support. Took her to CS court, was asked why I was harassing this poor woman. After the first hearing, I told my lawyer that if the roles were reversed I would have left that hearing room in cuffs. My lawyer disagreed. After the second hearing where the judge nearly held her in contempt just for attending (child support court is technically the state vs the payer, as the father I was irrelevant), she agreed.

Five years after the divorce, my first child is a full ride scholarship at a decent private college. My second is a senior in high school. I am wasting money fighting her annual round of contempt claims, but so what, I managed to rear them safe from her and her thoroughly documented physical and emotional abuse. I make a healthy six figures.

What made it possible was I read all the warnings about divorce and divorce court, and took them seriously. I documented thoroughly. I didn’t waste the court’s time or my money on anything irrelevant to the well-being of our children, who were themselves insistent to the social welfare thugs that they wanted to live with their father, period. I knew that any financial good deed to the ex would be wasted and would mean nothing to the court, so I gave none. Her lies to people cost me jobs I had lined up, so I went unemployed for years and let her deal with the consequences.

I’ve told many men this, but they don’t get it. They are their own worst enemies. Develop a cold heart and steel yourself so that you don’t react to anything she does or says. Concede nothing, so many men give away the farm. I had to flee the house in the middle of the night with our children, but I had a place to go to and called the police along the way. Guess what, it’s just a legal for men to do that as women. I filed for the TCO, the TRO and the house, how many men do that? What did the constabulary say when they arrived at my refuge? “About damn time you did something, mate.”

I am the exception to the crippling poverty, and there is a ton of luck behind that outcome, but fortune favors the prepared. I knew the truth about women, and about the family court system, so I didn’t let myself get financially raped while crying about fairness. Finding myself on a tilted playing field, I figured out how to tilt it in my children’s favor. I was accused of being dirty, cold, unkind, unforgiving, I never cared. No one, but no one, cares about my children like I do, no matter how much they say they do (usually for a gummint paycheck). No fucks given.

These war stories from the divorce trenches are tough to read, but every man should read them because a little preparedness and clarity of mind beats getting caught in the id-shredding shrapnel of a scorned woman with her merc army of lawyers and judges.

%d bloggers like this: