Trump’s Gynophilia

AJP writes,

I worry nominating a woman may be too tempting for [Trump]. Guess we’ll see.

Like many womanizers, Trump does have a troubling urge to elevate women within traditionally male bastions. Or at least to talk about elevating women into positions of power (while stealthily filling those roles with competent men). Bill Clinton had the same urge. I guess it’s some sort of self-penance for being a lifelong pussy hound, which expresses as a paternalistic, even patronizing, benevolent sexism.

Then you have on the opposite end of the male spectrum barely heterosexual characters like Gay Mulatto who elevated women out of both an ideological conviction and a desire to surround himself with gossipy yentas and ghetto mamas so he could feel at home being doted on by a coterie of female caregivers.

Either way, civilization loses.

***

As if shadowing this blog’s themes, the Daily Caller reports today that there was a “mean girl culture” in Gay Mulatto’s White House.

In a tell-all book about President Obama’s White House a former staffer writes about a “mean-girl culture” being “alive and well among the group.”https://t.co/mcSBjKfVU9 pic.twitter.com/PTpTHySNKP

— The Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) July 10, 2018

Gay Mulatto’s gynophilia issued from his need to be surrounded by yapping yentas and ghetto fabs who’d dote over him. Naturally, surrounding yourself with women destroys the working environment as gossip, backbiting, snark, passive-aggressive smear campaigns, and endless social status battles consume all the energy available to answer to the American people, but only a stone cold shiv artist like yours truly mentions these sex-based FACTS about women’s nature in a public forum, so eyes will stay closed and ears plugged until the Maul-Right becomes the Center of mainstream thought, or America implodes, whichever comes first.

Peak Cuckservatism

GETTING IT DONE THE RIGHT WAY — 14K LEGAL IMMIGRANTS WILL BECOME AMERICANS ON INDEPENDENCE DAY

“When oath ceremonies are tied to the Fourth of July, it’s a message that immigrants believe in this country,” Joshua Hoyt, executive director of National Partnership for New Americans (NPNA), told ABC News. “It’s a beautiful and emotional thing.”

Did this phaggot get a tingle up his leg?

Hoyt added that NPNA supports naturalization as being “good for the immigrants, their communities, and our nation,” while contributing to “higher incomes” and “social cohesion,” according to ABC News.

Higher incomes and social cohesion? HAHA who does this cuck think he’s fooling? Talk about a Big Lie. I mean, sure, maybe if all the new immigrants were Whites from NW Europe, there’d be a positive effect on median income level and social cohesion (though the latter will require a moratorium to thwart population churn and for absorption to work its magic), but I bet the vast majority of these new arrivals that give Joshua Hoyt a cuckporn erection are nonWhite.

This is Peak Cuckservatism. “As long as they come here legally, we love the Somalis and Pakistanis who are turning our homeland into a facsimile of the shitholes they left!”

The “fictive kinship” that sustains a healthy culture and national cohesion is more easily formed and coalesced in a nation of ethnic and racial kinship. Our culture flows like a river from the source pool of our genetic heritage. Without the binding agent of race and ethnicity, our ability to find commonality in shared history, shared values, and shared myths is corrupted and greatly weakened. Yet again, I have to hit cucks over the head with this undeniable reality; the “legal immigration” of the world’s mudhutters they so desperately cling to for social respectability will just as assuredly destroy America as the illegal immigration they posture against to give air to their real unspoken fear that the massive invasion of non-Europeans will utterly and irrevocably transform America into a District 9 wasteland.

Reminder: the Chateau’s epic reference list of “shit cuckservatives say“. Gotta keep hammering these cucks until they are so publicly shamed that not even NPR will have them on as controlled opposition.

MAKE SCOTUS SCROTUS AGAIN

At the time of this post’s publication, Trump may have already announced his SCOTUS nominee to replace the center-left Kennedy. Here’s to hoping his decision was made with the spirit of this post in mind.

As of this writing, the top 3 contenders (according to Anonymous Sources, who is probably one person who went to every one of the bar mitzvahs for the kids of Carlos Slim Times and Bezos Post employees) are Amy Barrett, Raymond Kethledge, and Brett Kavanaugh.

Kavanaugh is the only responsible choice.

Barrett is Justice Thinking Housewife (h/t MPC).

Barrett will be another Sandra O’Connor, except worse. Sure, she can be relied on to make pro-life (ie pro-brown and black population explosion) decisions, but on everything else the odds are good (and the goods odd) that she’ll be squishy as is the wont of her sex. Barrett’s record is slim, so we only have details from her personal life to create a picture of how she might vote on the National Question.

And boyee, those deets are the stuff of creeps. Barrett is a religious weirdo who has signed up for evangelical universalist cuckery despite herself being Catholic. (At some point, I have to write a post about how Evangelicuck and Cathocuck charities are doing the most practical damage to Heritage America through their work as middlemen resettling Dirt Worlders in red state pleasantvilles.)

Most damning, she adopted two Haitian Kisses while she was pregnant with her own White children.

Only an utterly vain and self-centered headcase would bring that degree of disruption into her home and hearth. As Pedestalman put it,

Jane nailed the main issue with Barrett:  she was adopting Haitians at the same time as she was carrying her own babies.  This is wildly f**king insane judgement and I’ll bet even Gwerks would agree this bitch is too crazy to serve on the court.  I don’t care how right wing she might be.  God only knows what zaniness is waiting to pour out of her.  “Our four children at home are with friends and fearless babysitters.”  Holy f**king s**t who talks like this?

No real track record and a history of dubious affiliations.  I really hope Trump is just toying with the media here.

And the phyzz doesn’t lie:

Those are psychocunt eyes. Sorry, I call it as I see it.

If the choice is between an anti-abortion justice and an anti-open borders justice, the latter wins, no contest. What future is fated for us in an America overrun by swarth-hordes whose numbers can’t at least be culled at the margins by the palliative of eugenic abortion? Answer: a DARK and DREARY future.

Here come the pro-life Boomers to scold me. My only response is that some lives really are worth more than others. What good have you done to save Somali babies when your country is flooded with violent, dumb aliens imposing countless miseries on your friends and neighbors? You saved a fetus at the cost of your country. You think that’ll get you through the pearly gates?

Bottom line: you can’t trust women with the judge’s gavel. Trump best stick to nominating a based male WOP or WASP. He’d probably be on safer ground nominating a pitch black conservative like Thomas, who has really developed into a smart and based Justice in the mold of Scalia.

Universal rule of jurisprudence: Women think in feelz. It always ALWAYS comes down to that with women. Feelz > Logic, Feelz > Country. Few exceptions:

***

Kethledge is a GOPe cuckstablishment stooge. He can be counted on to “grow into” another shitlib David Souter.

Kethlege's ruling for the illegal immigrant was too much even for the Clinton judge on the panel, who dissented. https://t.co/uyE1JOWZDR

— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) July 4, 2018

The open borders billionaire Cuck Brothers support a Kethledge nomination. That’s all you need to know about him. He’s a sure thing if you want a Justice who will mature into globohomoist leftism, finding precedent for American Rights to apply to all 7 billion people in the world.

Same person wrote me later saying that Kethledge's favorite columnists are neocons @BretStephensNYT and Charles @krauthammer who are both advocates of immigration and the proposition nation idea (for the US, not Israel). Kethledge shouldn't be anywhere near the Supreme Court

— Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit) July 7, 2018

It’s no surprise to anyone paying attention that huge cucks like Mitch McConnell and Ross Douthat are pushing Kethledge on Trump. If stool sitters like those two are for one guy, choose the other guy. You’ll never go wrong.

For the truly smart and prudent justices like Gorsuch and the late Scalia, it has to gall when a shit tier president like Gay Mulatto stuffs the court full of dumbfuck wise latinas and sophistic Oyveys. It lowers the value of the smart white males to be associated with these diversity world dregs.

Which is my way of saying, for the good of the country and the legitimacy of the Supreme Court, Trump should nominate hardcore White Christian Men for every one of the five SCOTUS vacancies he will have during his three terms.

MAKE SCOTUS SCROTUS AGAIN

(which in practice means make SCOTUS more White, Gentile, Male, and possessing of a shitlord physiognomy.)

Barrett is a virtue signaling psychocunt who put her signaling to practice and adopted two snickers bars to preen before her neighbors at the expense of her white kids’ emotional health.

Kethledge is controlled opposition who will do the bidding of ZOG.

It will be a yuge letdown if Trump nominates either one of these losers.

NO to Kethledge
NO to Barrett

YES to Kavanaugh

Kavanaugh is /ourguy/.

I really hope Trump is listening and doesn’t cuck this up.

***

How do you know the Uniparty fears a Kavanaugh nomination? Just look at the sneaky manipulations they’ll undertake to try and influence Trump away from Kavanaugh:

Washington Post thinks it can manipulate @realDonaldTrump by putting Brett Kavanaugh's photo on its front page WITH BUSH. pic.twitter.com/RRp1lW9ack

— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) July 4, 2018

The Bezos Post is shameless. I can’t wait for Bezos to institute a draconian pee break rule for Post reporters and to slap location finders on their wrists.

Comment Of The Week: Hamster Overload

From anonymous, our COTW winner (don’t you wish you had picked a handle now?):

For ages, people have asked “what do women want?”

The answer is simple.

Women want people and things that are pre-approved by their peers.

This becomes the torsion that wracks their very souls as socially, they are required to want things that are often diametrically the opposite of what they themselves want.

Sadly, the hamster will churn on, trying to weave a semblance of balance between the social needs and the internal wants.

This misalignment between social expectation and sexual appetite is stronger in women than in men; (it’s virtually nonexistent in men, because men from all classes and social strata prefer pretty young women over ugly older women).

We here at the Chateau have a term for it (courtesy of GBFM aka Q aka President Trump): alpha fux, beta bux. Women desire sexy charming jerkboys but also need dependable, reliable provider betaboys. Game is, succulently, a system of learned charisma that emphasizes jerkboy appeal (which most men lack) and merges it with beta provider cues of male mate fitness.

This shouldn’t be mistaken for the claim that women’s sexuality is always misaligned and that women are always having to choose between the alpha fux and the beta bux. Women often try to snag both male archetypes in the same package. The hottest of hotties will usually achieve the feat while the nottest of notties don’t even bother aiming for the alpha fux and will inevitably settle for a barely beta male or lonesome nights sifting smelly cat litter.

But, it is true that women as a sex experience a tension between social needs and crotchal wants that men rarely, if ever, experience at all, or with similar intensity. And in increasingly r-selected sexual markets that come to dominate declining cultures such as the current US, and which feature economically self-sufficient women, a shrinking pool of feminine slender beauties, and a retreat from the playing field by economically and culturally dispossessed men, this social need-sexual want tension in women is amplified to dangerous levels, resulting in misdirected conformism, hysteria, and eagerness to find purpose in cults, mass movements, and numinous negros.

Fewer beta bux AND fewer alpha fux that didn’t just disembark from the Dark Incontinent, coupled with delayed marriage and an enlarged window of nameless fornication fueled by birth control pills and wine by the bottle have driven our women right over the edge of sanity. Their rationalization hamsters are worked to near-death, spinning spinning until tufts of fur fly everywhere. The female wants are stoked to a fever in a charnel house of fly-by-night cock and chemically castrated womb, while the female needs are denied until a nervous breakdown or autistic IVF twins herald a lifetime of financial and psychological burden.

The hamster was never built for this sort of call to duty. The little guy spins a semblance of balance for a sexual market that didn’t outpace the speed of his wheel under his tiny legs. Now he runs as fast as he can but his legs give out as the wheel that manages communication between his vessel-woman’s fore- and hindbrain smokes and pops gears. The hamster no longer rides the wheel; the wheel rides him. The perfect metaphor of what our modren society does to women.

Pantifa

As the coiner of such popular neologisms as globohomo, soyim, Heritage America, pantifa* etc, I’m glad to see these terms saturate the dissident culture and brought to life in visual memes. For instance, this one by Big Country Expat:

My sides, they are a-splitting! I want to see this unfurled in giant banner form at the next pussysoy march. The consequences of that would provide entertainment value you just can’t buy these days.

*possible multiple independent coinages by luminaries unconnected to the Chateau should not be construed as a reason for me to subdue my preen. It’s a big world; intellectual property shadowing happens.

Seth Rich Murder Investigation Update

Seth Rich worked for the DNC (aka thecunt’s money laundering plaything). WikiLeaks happened. Then Rich was murdered late at night in a DC neighborhood. His killer(s) never found. But there is progress toward solving his murder. Yuge, if true:

The Washington, D.C. lobbyist who has been on the hunt for Seth Rich’s killer found a “credible” witness who will identify the two men he believes murdered the DNC staffer.

Jack Burkman, a Washington-based attorney and lobbyist who has worked with a private investigative team to solve the Seth Rich murder mystery, told The Gateway Pundit that the witness has conclusive evidence that will bring Rich’s killers to justice within a month.

“We believe that we have reached the beginning of the end of the Seth Rich murder investigation,” Burkman toldThe Gateway Pundit Monday.  “After two long hard years of work, we have a witness who is prepared to identify the two killers of Seth Rich. One is reportedly a current DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) agent, the other is reportedly a current ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) agent,” Jack Burkman, told TGP in an exclusive interview.

Stay tuned. My intuition was always that something fishy was going on with the Seth Rich murder besides a garden variety nog-on-white racist hate crime.

If an arm of the Deep State was involved with the Rich murder and two government employees were the hired hit men, don’t wake up the next day after the news drops expecting life in America to be the same. It will change everything.

The Opportunistic Meme

lmao