This is what happens to childless women when they get old and their wombs turn to dust.
A song is in order to pay tribute to Sarah Silverman’s call for a military coup. Sing along, why don’t you!
Dust in the Womb
(first stanza courtesy of Twatter contributor @DrGarnicus)
I froze my eggs only for a moment, and the moment’s gone
All my queefs pass before my thighs, a curiosity
Dust in the womb, all my eggs are dust in the womb
Same old womb, just a drop of semen and dead ovaries
All you screw finds no fertile ground, except a wizard sleeve
Dust in the womb, all eggs gone to dust in the womb
Now, don’t bang on, cats cannot recover a womb left to die
Eggs slip away, and all your crying won’t a single child buy
Dust in the womb, all you are is dust in the womb (all you are is dust in the womb)
Dust in the womb (every skank has dust for a womb), infertility of the womb (dead womb)
Neil Gorsuch (an old Anglo-Saxon name) is Trump’s nominee for Scalia’s empty spot on the Supreme Court. By all accounts, Gorsuch is Best Pick. Super smart. Right philosophy. Right tribe. Right physiognomy. Attractive wife. And perhaps pre-channeling Richard Spencer’s Glib Heil, Gorsuch even mischievously started and ran a group at the prep school he attended in the 1980s, called “Fascism Forever Club“, to protest the leftist hegemony of the school’s faculty.
You can bet that will trigger the ANTIcipating FAglove (antifa) degenerate freak mafia.
Here’s Gorsuch with his tradwife. She’s holding up well.
WB. Do you see a hoverhand there? I don’t. I do see a man with an impeccable shitlord face claiming ownership of his slender prairie lass companion. One thing we will never see in a Trump White House: blue hair feminist fatty freaks, mewling manlets, or hoverhands. And why is that? Because the people who hold America First ideas tend to be sexually dimorphic — that is, the men are men and the women are women. Reinforcing that notable alpha infusion into the White House is Trump’s rumored predilection for choosing allies based on their shitlord physiognomy. The less like a nancycuck you look, the more likely Trump will warm to you.
In fact, I think Trump’s preference to surround himself with alpha males (and comparatively with beautiful women) is so strong that sometimes his apprentices out-alpha the master.
Watch this short vid of Gorsuch and Trump — two lions on the veldt — approaching for the handshake.
That handshake is saying, “Yes, Neil, you are an apex White male predator, just the kind I like to have on my side, but juuuuuust in case you need reminding who’s running the show…. *POWER SHAKE*.”
Or it could just mean that Trump’s a really personable guy when he likes you, and he shows his affinity through the man code of rough and gruff physicality.
Here’s more. In this photo still, Gorsuch actually has the more alpha body language. Chin higher, eyes locked on Trump, who does have a tendency to slouch at the neck (I chalk that up to his age and heavy frame).
After eight years of AW CUCKS George W Bush having his strings pulled by neocon traitors, and eight years of Gay Mulatto snarking and snarling his spite for heritage White America at every chance, I can’t tell you what a FUCKING RELIEF it is to have a real man storm the gates and make the White House Proudly White again.
Here’s an Instagram photo of Jared Kushner with his wife Ivanka Trump. Keep in mind this photo was selected and posted by Ivanka herself.
No doubt Ivanka felt her husband’s hand on her ass, and knew the world would see this photo. So she’s sending a message: “I love my ass-grabbing husband and his sexual objectification of me.”
VERDICT: Jared Kushner is alpha.
Trumperica is having that effect. You can see it at the White House, where lifelong mincing betas like Spicer and Priebus have magically located their balls this past week and are dishing the shit to the media and leftoids like they never have before. Even CuckRyan showed a glimmer of sacking up (still don’t trust him).
The only question remaining about Kushner is whether he knew the camera would capture his mirrored grabass. If he knew, then Chateau SMV judges will have to review his status for a possible upgrade to Super Alpha.
Why are mass protests usually the domain of crazy-eyed leftoids? I’ve mentioned it before — and parisian privilege mentions it here — that geographic distribution plays a role in the Right-Left mass protest disparity. It’s simply a fact that densely populated coastal cities loaded up with shitlibs provide a large, quickly mobilized base from which to efficiently scale up a mass protest.
Conservatives number in the single percentiles in most of the blue megalopolises that host these mass protests; they live in the suburbs and towns, so getting into the city for them means a minimum one hour trek by car and then finding street parking or paying through the nose for it at a garage. Shitlibs living in the city can roll out of bed, and if they skip the shower (they often do), they can be downtown with their paper mache puppets in fifteen minutes flat. Geographic centralization and density without a doubt amplifies shitlib protest formation.
And it’s far easier to get the word out about a protest inside of shitlibistans. One poster advertising a march stapled to a kiosk on one city block will reach a thousand eyeballs. Where would one tape up a poster in the suburbs? A street light pole. Ok, that’ll be seen by the fifteen people who live on that leafy suburban street.
Pleasureman unnecessarily and superciliously objects to this theory, which is a habit I’ve noticed of him. PugnaciousMan is a natural contrarian — it’s the trait that probably drew him to the maul-right and against the reigning equalism orthodoxy — but he carries his contrarian banner into too many battlefields, frequently winding up contradicting himself out of stubborn resistance to conforming to a majority view. No need for the perpetual pissiness, Pman, you can curb your obstinacy without losing e-dad cred. Geography plays a role in the relative paucity of conservative mass protests; so do other factors, which you and others in your thread wrote about; the factors aren’t mutually exclusive.
Pman prefers to blame character or personality failings of conservatives for their aversion to political activism. He belittles conservatives for this, but it’s unfair to call conservative “inactivism” a failing; rather, conservatives have inherited a unique suite of personality traits and moral feelings that predispose them to methods of registering their disagreement and of seeking social belonging that aren’t mass protests.
I happen to think the moral dimension of DISGUST has a lot to tell us about leftoid protest organizational skill and affinity for mass protesting. A big moral chasm between conservatives and liberals is the feeling of disgust; cons have low disgust thresholds (they are acutely sensitive to disgusting things or disgusting people) and libs have high disgust thresholds (they can tolerate, even enjoy wallowing in, disgusting things). Gathering tit-to-tit and fagface-to-fagface by the thousands, hoisting obscene placards and wearing obscene costumes, and cursing for hours at the top of one’s lungs feels disgusting to cons. Libs, otoh, practically live for the degenerate slop life.
Keep in mind, too, that atomized city living requires a different way of looking at friendships. SWPL city libs have fewer means of building social connections than do cons. The urban shitlib has lost the social glue of his family and the neighborhood he grew up in. He has to befriend people through his job…or through similar political outlook. And the multiracial, low trust blue cities lean heavily on politics as a friendship glue, at least for Whites. So you’ve got a dense population of extremely politicized shitlibs yearning for social belonging who are within walking distance of mass protest sites and are bombarded on every street corner with posters screaming for “resistance”.
Now, I happen to agree with Pman and others that cons need to get better at mass protesting, or whatever the optical equivalent of mass protesting is, because as long as the media acts as a leftoid propaganda mill framing all lib vice as virtue and con virtue as vice, cons can’t afford to cede the protest arena to shitlib shenanigans. Cons may not like it, but when Civil War II is looming it’s time to tear away from the college football and hit the streets, real or metaphorical, to do your part reframing the media anti-White message machine. If there was ever a time for acting and not just reacting, this is it.
But the adage “maximum your strengths, minimize your weaknesses” applies here; maybe cons shouldn’t bother getting in the street theater mud with shitlibs where the latter are strongest. I don’t know what the optimal counter-attack will be for cons, but it has to include defusing the leftoid legacy media normie-destruction protocol. Which Trump is doing, PBUH.
I also don’t buy the argument that leftoids are better at organizing protests because they’re SMRTer or more conscientious than conservatives.
And contrary to the self-serving pablum pushed by conservatives, almost all of these high-involvement liberal activists have jobs and a healthy majority have at least some sort of family commitment. They’re just way more willing to make personal sacrifices for the sake of political action than conservatives are, and the squalid direction of American society over the last half century bears witness to this tragic fact.
Maybe the top of the shitlib protest organizational chart is staffed with UMC mcmansion strivers, but the rank and file — you know the hundreds of thousands down on the field capturing media attention — really are disproportionately filled with bitter aging spinsters, childless shrikes with libtart degrees working as baristas, and their weak chinless male hangers-on thinking of post-protest pity blowies.
The sexual market is, like with most big picture issues, the best lens for viewing the phenomenon of mass protesting. Conservatives find fulfillment checking off in a timely manner the traditional milestones of a good life. Liberals below the UMC level enjoy more chaotic, novelty-seeking lives, and part of that can mean enduring stretches of sexual and romantic dissatisfaction or loneliness. And in fact we see this behavioral preference of liberals reflected in the fertility of their women, who average fewer kids than do conservative women. Mass protests are the shitlib sublimation of their reduced fertility. They hope their slogans will seed the future they aren’t conceiving.
Conservatives may numerically outnumber liberals nationally, but it doesn’t matter because in the political protest arena that anyone is showing up to, liberals vastly outnumber cons. So cons should focus on fighting an asymmetric war against the louder voices of the Left. This could mean hidden camera type stuff, like James O’Keefe does, or prank videos, like Sam Hyde does. On a larger scale, it means trust-busting the tech and media oligarchies. Guerrilla tactics are how the geographically distributed Right will take down the densely urbanized Left. Small, thematically targeted protests by cons in their suburbs and towns, multiplied a thousand-fold across the nation and coordinated to exploit the transmission power of the net, WILL have an impact on the media narrative, even if the media tries to negatively spin it.
And it needs to be said, conservatives steeled themselves for the fight when they unburdened themselves of the demoralizing dead weight of their cowardly cuckservative opinion “leaders”. Trump’s greatest blow, imo, was his utter annihilation of any coherent or effective controlled opposition of cuck saboteurs. Once he did that, he could turn his gatlings on the Left and the media with much greater force than if he had to fire while weaselly cucks were pushing the safety back on. Trump opened a way forward for local conservatives to fight back against the poz; his greatest gift to them has been to show that victory can be had without betraying one’s principles.
This is a more accurate graphic depiction of the message delivered by Shepard Fairey’s original poster, which Steve Sailer identified as the Orientalist hijab fetishism of White male liberals who fantasize about a submissive hot babe underneath the tents, and of White female liberals who fantasize about submitting to a strong swarthy non-liberal man.
A reference photo from real life Sharia Law that White liberals want to import to the West:
If your body language resembles the pose of the male in this photo, and the girl you’re with looks like the woman in this photo, end your date immediately because you aren’t getting any.
Ouch. So much beta in one snapshot. A summary of what he’s doing wrong:
- leaning forward
- clasping hands (merchant-style) and blocking the view of his crotch
- downcast gaze
- looks like he’s apologizing for farting
And her autonomous “get away from me you lazy-eyed psycho” reaction:
- leaning backward
- arms and hands blocking vagina viewage
- retreated into corner of couch to maximize physical distance
- looks like she smelled a fart
Remember the cardinal rule of pickup: FLIP THE SCRIPT. You will get sex if you are the chasee and the woman is the chaser. It takes some skill and effort to flip the seduction script, because the default dynamic between men and women is hunter male-hunted female….which will never be overturned, but a smart man knows perceptions can be altered just enough to jog a woman out of her natural indifference and into a curious feeling.
Ben Shapiro’s lawyer is chasing badly here, and Tomi is reacting as most attractive women do when presented with an over-eager suitor — she is recoiling to protect her precious eggs from contamination by subpar sperm.
So what should Shapirolawyer be doing instead? Think the Mad Men silhouette: relaxing lasciviously into the couch, arm draped over the back, legs impudently spread, head tilted back a little, chin up, smile wiped from his face. As a man, if you incorporate these alpha body language cues, the woman you are with will irresistibly and mechanically assume the vulnerable, entreating posture of flowering arousal. As you lean back, she leans in….as you stop smiling, she smiles more (to earn your hiding smile)….as you eye her judgmentally, she juts her bosom under your gaze….as you deliver ambiguous signals of intent, her intent to get to know you becomes clearer. When you feel that she has begun chasing you is when you can make a more forcefully intentional move on her sexsugarbloodmagick. A woman needs this challenge; deny her at risk of acquiring incel mojo.